Devils team discussion (news, notes and speculation) - offseason part II

  • HFBoards is well aware that today is election day in the US. We ask respectfully to focus on hockey and not politics.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Triumph

Registered User
Oct 2, 2007
14,002
14,920
When did Dellow do that, before he was hired by Vancouver in 2014?

He was hired by Edmonton, I think in 2013, but yes, I believe he wrote it in 2010. I think Nicklas Backstrom's long-term deal was the impetus for the investigation, or perhaps even Kovalchuk's long-term deal(s).

If it’s a one year deal then the extension has to come sooner than later.

If Bratt gets a 1-year deal, then he can't sign an extension until January 1, 2023.

I do think his agent probably sucks, you don’t want to be the biggest fish of some local guy. Bratt should have ditched this guy already. If they don’t get a long term deal here hopefully he does. Move up to a top agency dude and Joakim McGuire.

Yeah, I didn't realize Bratt was this guy's biggest client, always tough to be a client of one of these guys trying to make a name for themselves. I wonder how Gilles Lupien's career went after being fired by Brodeur.
 

JimEIV

Registered User
Feb 19, 2003
67,701
30,526
...says a fan of the New Jersey Devils, a team that seldom led the league in scoring or was even close but nonetheless had an impressive 15+ year run of excellence because of defense,
Positive goal differential ever year from being top 10 in Goals Against EVERY year

Done with team defense....

Whooowee.. Took a rocket scientist to figure that one out. You needed an abstract formula for that one?

Who plays that way anymore?
 
  • Like
Reactions: NjdevilfanJim

RangerDoggo

The Devils have a culture of failure
Feb 3, 2016
3,166
2,592
Brooklyn via NJ, like the Nets
I do think his agent probably sucks, you don’t want to be the biggest fish of some local guy. Bratt should have ditched this guy already. If they don’t get a long term deal here hopefully he does. Move up to a top agency dude and Joakim McGuire.
His agent is not doing anything he doesn't want.

just get a deal done fitz f***
You know damn well that isn't going to happen. Face reality. Bratt will never play for this team long term. It is time to move on and trade this petulant little shit.
 
  • Like
Reactions: McDuffz88

Devs3cups

Wind of Change
Sponsor
May 8, 2010
21,720
38,288
Fitz is lowballing Bratt, and in turn Bratt is ardently refusing to sign long term. Both parties can be at fault.
Highly doubt Fitz is lowballing Bratt. Bratt wants less term to get a paycheck, Fitz wants him here longterm at around 7-7.5.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Darkauron

SteveCangialosi123

Registered User
Feb 17, 2012
29,429
52,751
NJ
You know damn well that isn't going to happen. Face reality. Bratt will never play for this team long term. It is time to move on and trade this petulant little shit.
How many more posts like this are you gonna fart out? Worst case he’s getting a 1 year deal and he’s still an RFA. It is not “time to move on.”
 

Guttersniped

I like goalies who stop the puck
Sponsor
Dec 20, 2018
22,675
50,599
It’s not that easy or simple as you said where Fitz is lowballing Bratt. Arbitration is always like this where the team makes a lower number tham what they are willing to pay and the player ask for more . The usually (hopefully meet in the middle ‘ish). Also , if Fitz thinks he cannot extend Bratt and has a feeling that he wants to get to UFA as soon as possible , he is trying to get the lowest cap hit as possible to get maximum value in trade …..
Fitz isn’t dumb. He is not going to low ball Bratt amd lose him unless the writing is on the wall and Fitz needs to switch gears and maximize the return for him.

I know how arbitration works. I’m talking about if it gets to arbitration.

GMs typically avoid the hearing by agreeing to a 1 year deal at the last minute. If they can’t even agree on their own number between those two amounts and need an arbitrator to do it, that’s definitely a bad sign.

Fitz actually has a current need for that number to be low. We have 8.7m in cap space and need to sign 4 guys. Wood is guaranteed at least 3m.

No teams are taking bad contracts, or even blah contracts, it’s very hard to move cap in this market.

I don’t what his plan with the cap is. We’ll all find out. I do know if he goes to a hearing with Bratt the chances of him being on this team longterm take a big hit. They aren’t great already. Fitz needs to avoid going to a hearing.

Qualifying Wood was a disaster, we’re wasting desperately needed cap space to have an injured player for one year before he hits the UFA market.
 

RangerDoggo

The Devils have a culture of failure
Feb 3, 2016
3,166
2,592
Brooklyn via NJ, like the Nets
How many more posts like this are you gonna fart out? Worst case he’s getting a 1 year deal and he’s still an RFA. It is not “time to move on.”
As many times as it takes to understand that I'm right. And then we do this bullshit song and dance again next year. I don't want to deal with this again. Trade him for a player who's fine playing in a culture of failure, because Bratt isn't.
 

Triumph

Registered User
Oct 2, 2007
14,002
14,920
Positive goal differential ever year from being top 10 in Goals Against EVERY year

Done with team defense....

Whooowee.. Took a rocket scientist to figure that one out. You needed an abstract formula for that one?

Who plays that way anymore?

That's exactly the point, nobody plays that way anymore, so you need more investigation to see what players are actually helping on defense versus hurting. Bratt helps on defense, everyone has better results with him. Tkachuk doesn't, at least not yet, he's still young and can figure things out.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Guttersniped

Devs3cups

Wind of Change
Sponsor
May 8, 2010
21,720
38,288
Then why the 2.5 million gap in money?
Arbitration offers mean nothing. For example, MTL offered 5.25 mil in arbitration to Subban back in the day, while his camp filled for just over 8 mil if I recall. A few days afterwards, Montreal signed him to a 9 mil deal.

Arbitration offers are not relevant to actual discussed numbers by both parties. They’re always pretty far appart.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Darkauron

ninetyeight

Registered User
Jun 3, 2007
2,090
3,121
Finland
So if this goes to arbitration and they sign a 1 year 5.5m deal, is the silverlining in this that they don't have to pay anyone to take Tatar or Johnsson and can just let the contracts run out.
 

TrufleShufle

Registered User
Aug 31, 2012
8,425
14,003
As many times as it takes to understand that I'm right. And then we do this bullshit song and dance again next year. I don't want to deal with this again. Trade him for a player who's fine playing in a culture of failure, because Bratt isn't.
Can you expand on how, in anyway, you are dealing with this? By reading random rumor news and tweets?

So Fitz is low balling and Bratt is tired of losing and wants out, I've asked but still have gotten an answer, please show me where you are getting this information so I can be upset as well.
 

RangerDoggo

The Devils have a culture of failure
Feb 3, 2016
3,166
2,592
Brooklyn via NJ, like the Nets
Can you expand on how, in anyway, you are dealing with this? By reading random rumor news and tweets?

So Fitz is low balling and Bratt is tired of losing and wants out, I've asked but still have gotten an answer, please show me where you are getting this information so I can be upset as well.
You should be upset regardless because in two years at the most, Bratt will not play here.
 

TrufleShufle

Registered User
Aug 31, 2012
8,425
14,003
6op3mi.jpg
 

NJDevs26

Once upon a time...
Mar 21, 2007
68,474
33,947
Highly doubt Fitz is lowballing Bratt. Bratt wants less term to get a paycheck, Fitz wants him here longterm at around 7-7.5.
Your definition of lowballing probably differs from Bratt and his agent’s, though I don’t think that anything in the 7’s could be considered lowballing I also don’t think that’s market value at this point. I also think the actual offer is probably in the 6’s which would be lowballish
 
  • Like
Reactions: Devs3cups

ninetyeight

Registered User
Jun 3, 2007
2,090
3,121
Finland
We still have to deal with both of them taking up a roster spot, so that’s not a silver lining.

That's nearly not as big of a deal, you can play them, healthy scratch them or send them to waivers. It would be a minor victory if Fitz can make the cap work without LTIR or paying assets to get rid of contracts.
 

Guttersniped

I like goalies who stop the puck
Sponsor
Dec 20, 2018
22,675
50,599
His agent is not doing anything he doesn't want.


You know damn well that isn't going to happen. Face reality. Bratt will never play for this team long term. It is time to move on and trade this petulant little shit.
It has nothing to do with his agent doing what he “wants”, his agent has practically zero experience negotiating big deals like this in the NHL. He’s a Swedish agent who mostly handles players in European leagues.

He’s had one big NHL client before this, Ullmark. Ullmark never had a multi year deal, beyond a two-year minimum deal after his ELC, until he signed his 5 year/5m deal with Boston.

He had other guy with a real deal, the defenseman Gustav Forsling. Forsling has the only multi year RFA deal he ever negotiated, 3 years/2.67m.

You don’t typically want to be the biggest fish of a guy who almost never negotiates these types of deal. Loyalty is nice but you shouldn’t stay with an agent out of loyalty if he’s out of his league because you became a star.

Eichel was using some dumb local Boston agent with his dust-up with the Sabres and he only made it worse. That mess got a whole lot better when he moved to a bigger, more professional agent.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad