Mgd31
Registered User
Not sure how I feel about Sullivan. I wish we went outside the Pittsburgh connection route.
Worms like in Pink Floyd’s the Wall?
lmao yes it should be made clear that I am a residential architect in Florida who has absolutely zero connection to the team. my friend is connected in some capacity, a capacity I will not divulge, but connected enough where I typically walk in through a different entrance when I visit NJ and typically enjoy Devils games in Prudential from a suite filled with Brooks Brothers' suits and mediocre sushi.At least you gave us where you got the information and we can believe, disbelieve, or ignore as we like.
Much better than when people say they see something on Twitter rumors with no tweets.
smh mh smh smhmhmhmh mhmh of course you're a nico hischier hater.
Everyone else on that list will literally die without a thicc boi to protect them. Is that what you want???
Everyone focuses on their forwards. Yes, being top heavy, losing Nylander and not getting Conn Smyth-type performances from the other 3 is bad (for them).
But the Leaf’s Top 4 is trash. Brodie came back for Game 4 but he‘s cooked. Their defense isn’t good at anything. Reilly is the only offensive guy but no one stands out defensively.
HockeyViz
View attachment 862063View attachment 862064
The Athletic
View attachment 861934
View attachment 861936View attachment 861937View attachment 861938
Their top 6 didn’t get tougher. And their D is still poorly constructed.
I can’t stand strawmans…or semantics. In this argument we get a healthy helping of each.
my buddy who tipped me off about the bratt extension and the severson trade just said sully and pittsburgh are mutually parting in the next 24 hours and that sully/nj will be announced within a week.
if he's wrong I won't post his shit again. but he's usually not wrong.
lmao yes it should be made clear that I am a residential architect in Florida who has absolutely zero connection to the team. my friend is connected in some capacity, a capacity I will not divulge, but connected enough where I typically walk in through a different entrance when I visit NJ and typically enjoy Devils games in Prudential from a suite filled with Brooks Brothers' suits and mediocre sushi.
Only one of them ? Very disappointingI can't wait for Fitz big move this summer.
Ilya Sorokin, Brady Tkachuk, Jacob Markstrom, Steven Stamkos
One of those players will be a Devil.
Only one of them ? Very disappointing
I can't think of any Devil in the top 6 that would do what Jamie Benn does in this clip aside from maybe Meier ^ but I can think of atleast 4 players in the top 6 that would of been flattened like Stankoven was. Granted Stankoven is probably the smallest player in the NHL right now but Benn didn't hesitate to stick up for his teammate with a big clean hit. That's the kind of grit the top 6 is missing. I don't care what people do after the play is dead mucking it up or whatever , it's about the play on ice when their is no stoppage that matters the most.
I’m good with bringing in a veteran coach like Sullivan, look at the results the Rangers are having with cry baby Laviolette coming in.Not sure how I feel about Sullivan. I wish we went outside the Pittsburgh connection route.
I’m simply pointing out the facts of the issue, not the reasons why a GM may or may not have addressed said issue. The Leafs have had more than half a decade to try to address the issues with their top players, I’m not getting into a retrospective of what moves they could have made or who they could have gone after.I just distilled the debate you are having down to its simplest form - you are lamenting an absence from the market that is due to a lack of available players, not a decision any GM is actually making. The only readily available players who can add toughness are generally not great players - because if they were teams wouldn't give them up - which is why posters constantly bring up players like Reaves or MacDerimid (you know, players who actually changed teams).
Presenting someone who can fill this hole would have fewer people calling out the low level thugs.
I’m simply pointing out the facts of the issue, not the reasons why a GM may or may not have addressed said issue. The Leafs have had more than half a decade to try to address the issues with their top players, I’m not getting into a retrospective of what moves they could have made or who they could have gone after.
I don’t think it’s what you say. The people who like to argue strawmans and semantics about “toughness” by and large tend to be the people who dismiss its importance in the top 6.
Please tell me your source is saying they’re gonna do some house cleaning with their Associate Coach and goaltending coach.lmao yes it should be made clear that I am a residential architect in Florida who has absolutely zero connection to the team. my friend is connected in some capacity, a capacity I will not divulge, but connected enough where I typically walk in through a different entrance when I visit NJ and typically enjoy Devils games in Prudential from a suite filled with Brooks Brothers' suits and mediocre sushi.
Yes Just one! Stammer and Palat are back together!
The issue as I see it as that there seems to be some segment of fans and the hockey world that equate toughness with strictly bottom 6 forwards who fight and hit but don’t do much else well. When in reality, you need toughness in your top 6, and what that entails is a mix of two way commitment, being hard on the puck, forecheck relentlessness, and the willingness to be a pest or at minimum push back physically/not be bullied.
The maple leafs did not properly address any of that. Their star players are softies both mentally and physically in the playoffs.
Also, the construction of the D-core is way off. No real #1 and no depth.
I think that says just as much about the goalies.Sure it's a little misleading, but being on the ice for 22 empty net goals against can't be ignored either. That's a horrible stat on its own.
Sure it's a little misleading, but being on the ice for 22 empty net goals against can't be ignored either. That's a horrible stat on its own.
I don't see how anyone can argue against Bedard and Faber being #1 and #2 - pretty clear distinction between them and the rest.
That and we'll know very quickly if there's something to it when/if the announcement on a parting of the ways with Sullivan comes today or tomorrow lolAt least you gave us where you got the information and we can believe, disbelieve, or ignore as we like.
Much better than when people say they see something on Twitter rumors with no tweets.