- Feb 5, 2010
- 48,949
- 20,156
If they trade Mercer, Casey, or a first for a streaky 34 yo goalie, it would be profoundly stupid.
I'd add Holtz to that list as well. Because keeping Toff and trading Holtz would also be profoundly stupid.
If they trade Mercer, Casey, or a first for a streaky 34 yo goalie, it would be profoundly stupid.
What exactly has Holtz done?I'd add Holtz to that list as well. Because keeping Toff and trading Holtz would also be profoundly stupid.
He’s top 50 in the league for goals scored per 60 while playing with very little offensive help.What exactly has Holtz done?
We get a different goalie for cheaper at the draft and try again next year with a better coach?What happens when we don't address goaltending and Vitek/Schmid/Daws tank another season because we can't buy a save AGAIN?
Shown us that with maturity and playing time he will be a consistent 30 goal 30 assist player in this league.What exactly has Holtz done?
You have to assume in 3 years Holtz will still be an NHL player...under cost control....What exactly has Holtz done?
Or hear me out. What happens if he doesn’t.What happens next season when Markstrom blows out his hip like Bernier did and we’re stuck with Daws/Schmid AGAIN?
Uhh no he isn't lol. That stat is from like November. He's 86th below guys like Daniel Sprong, Sam Gagner, Dmitri Vorkonov, Trevor Moore, and Jacob MacDonald.He’s top 50 in the league for goals scored per 60 while playing with very little offensive help.
So you want Holtz to be a goal scorer and he’s scoring goals
Have you seen what our goaltending has done to us this season. That’s why we are desperateMarkstrom at 34 is not the answer. If you get him for free no objection but you don’t give up young assets for him. Why would be so desperate?
Uhh no he isn't lol. That stat is from like November. He's 86th below guys like Daniel Sprong, Sam Gagner, Dmitri Vorkonov, Trevor Moore, and Jacob MacDonald.
Holtz hasn’t even remotely earned the right to be mentioned in the same production level as Toff.I'd add Holtz to that list as well. Because keeping Toff and trading Holtz would also be profoundly stupid.
I'm not worried about 3 years from now. I'm worried about winning in the next 3 years.You have to assume in 3 years Holtz will still be an NHL player...under cost control....
Markstrom will be in the Villages playing shuffleboard and living an active adult lifestyle.
You have to assume in 3 years Holtz will still be an NHL player...under cost control....
Markstrom will be in the Villages playing shuffleboard and living an active adult lifestyle.
Agreed, Mercer for Markstrom makes no sense.If Mercer is included you might as well walk over to nashvilles door and offer him for saros
Now click sort to 5 on 5 and he’s 33rd
This is where I get a little lost..what do you mean by "winning".I'm not worried about 3 years from now. I'm worried about winning in the next 3 years.