never heard about the 9+2 thing but thinking back to my decades of soccer playing it makes sense....if we were out 2 key players (usually mids and forwards) our offence was f***ed....
our D was a force and we were legit 6 deep for a 4 man back system for years. also helped that half of us D could play up in the formation and be fine but with less attack
Yeah, it's not telling you anything you don't know already, mostly just providing some criteria to measure how to evaluate injuries affecting a team. If you have one injury as a hockey team, even if it's to your top guy, but everyone else is fine then it probably isn't because of injuries that you're losing. I first saw it bandied about in an Atlanta United discord server a couple of years ago where they were just getting decimated by injuries, including multiple season-enders. The conclusion was basically that they sucked, but it was hard to really tell how bad because they only had 9+2 or better for about 5 out of 30 games that year.
I haven't gone through and actually figured it out, but it has to be less than 10% of our games played to this point where we had some combination of our top 13-14 forwards and 7 D on the roster to start the year. It's simply not possible to properly execute any system consistently given that.
Hockey is a game where you don’t need a complicated system….any sport for that matter
Keep it simple players are at their best when they are reacting and not thinking
I agree to an extent that simple systems can be fine, but if you tell players to just go out there and play with no structure that's abysmal. We've had a coach in recent history who had a system that was too simple and wound up just looking like a bunch of guys going out and skating aimlessly. You need defined ways to move the puck out of the defensive zone and to enter the offensive zone, you need to understand what you want to do with possession in the offensive zone and how you want to try to open up opportunities, you need to know how you're defending in the neutral zone. I think the happy medium is somewhere between what Ruff does and a straight up man to man defensive coverage and freewheeling on offense.
You have a pretty good handle on the system but there is more of 3 forwards than centers and wingers in the defensive zone.
It is pretty rare for teams to have both defenseman leave the crease like this because the likeliest outcomes are the crease isn’t defended, it’s defended by a forward who isn’t good at it, and/or the defender came later than the offensive player and the offensive player now has superior positioning.
So take a puck that is in the corner. Defenseman 1 will engage directly with the puck. Defenseman 2 will engage and support. Forward 1 will also engage and support but from a foot away to try and anticipate where the puck will come out. Forward 2 will sit against the halfboards on the side the puck is. Forward 3 owns the slot. The entire rest of the ice is nobodies responsibility.
This system is a good idea if your defenseman can rapidly engage and recover the puck, winning that initial puck battle almost immediately. If you don’t win the puck almost immediately then you’re in for a bad time as the offensive players away from the puck have a lot of space and a good view of the defense so they can pick the weak spots. Also, the forwards are either near the puck or in the slot and all standing still so it can be very hard to breakout clean if the other team forechecks. Other teams often aggressively forecheck with 1-3 guys and allow the other 2 to stay in the zone passively forechecking and the Devils don’t have an answer to that except when a player can skate it out themselves.
The bolded is a key difference between this year and last year, imo. Severson in particular was great at this, but missing Hamilton has hurt as well. Both of them can pick a pass and spring a rush when they have the puck.
The swarm bit itself is not totally abnormal. Some other teams do run it in doses and many teams default to a version with a forward and D pressuring the puck. Many of our D-zone breakdowns this year have also been completely unrelated to the swarm and more due to the D making bad reads trying to make outlet passes, or the forwards being worse at receiving passes and generating controlled exits to take back possession. The support D is also supposed to disengage after the rest of the opponents establish positioning in the zone to help cover the slot or the pass behind the net and that hasn't happened as quickly this year either. This is where the lack of experience in the system hurts. Last year, Severson, Graves, Hamilton, Seigenthaler, and Bahl all had at least a bit of experience in the system. Smith and Marino were newcomers but they both had pro experience at least, and Marino has a lot of the attributes that make for a good D in the system.
There's also the caveat that this is only the system in the D zone, and there's a lot of decisions and defensive responsibility on the forwards' part in the offensive and neutral zones that ideally keep the other team on their heals and keep them from breaking out quickly. When that is happening more consistently, they only end up attacking with one or two forwards at first and it is easier to either break up their rush in the neutral zone or for the swarm to gain control in a safer environment before the other team gets numbers into the attack. That all requires forwards and D that are working together seamlessly in the offensive and neutral zones, another area that is crippled with so much lineup inconsistency.