Confirmed with Link: Devils sign Tomas Tatar - 2 years @ $4.5M AAV

JimEIV

Registered User
Feb 19, 2003
67,715
30,552
Zacha has potential to be better sure, I don't see it happening as a complete player, but at no point in his career has he ever been better then Tatar.
Zacha was better this season.

That's the thing...Are we getting a .9 ppg version of Tatar or are we getting a .6 ppg version?

And is that .6 down from .9 the beginning of decline? Because Zacha at .7 ppg has shown improvement in each of his seasons in the NHL.
 
Last edited:

Richer's Ghost

Bourbonite
Apr 19, 2007
60,617
15,720
photoshop labor camp somewhere in MN
Zacha is far superior to Tatar on the wing. But the problem with Zacha is the Devils cannot play him at center, he is far superior on the wing than center.

iu
 

Hisch13r

Registered User
May 16, 2012
35,193
35,936
NJ
Zacha was better this season.

That's the thing...Are we getting a .9 ppg version of Tatar or are we getting a .6 ppg version?

And is that .6 down from .9 the beginning of decline? Because Zacha at .7 ppg has shown improvement in each of his seasons in the NHL.

He wasn't even better this year. Similar overall production rate. Tatar with the decided 5v5 edge. Tatar drives play. Zacha doesn't. Even if he was slightly better this year it was off of the back of an incredibly unsustainable shooting year.
 

JimEIV

Registered User
Feb 19, 2003
67,715
30,552
He wasn't even better this year. Similar overall production rate. Tatar with the decided 5v5 edge. Tatar drives play. Zacha doesn't. Even if he was slightly better this year it was off of the back of an incredibly unsustainable shooting year.
I don't really consider .7 ppg and .6 ppg similar production. One is 49.2 points over 82 and the other Is 57.4

And with that one had 17 goals (or 28 over 82) the other had 10 (or 16 over 82 )

And at Even Strength Zacha outscored Tater there too. Tater had 22 ES points and Zacha had 24. 12 to 8 ES goals in favor of Zacha.

You can find ways to discount that but I am taking 17 goals over 10 in 50 games every single time.
 
Last edited:

RSeen

Registered User
Oct 26, 2011
6,790
2,154
Toronto
Zacha is far superior to Tatar on the wing. But the problem with Zacha is the Devils cannot play him at center, he is far superior on the wing than center.
Yeah....No he is not. Zacha has not proven to be more than a bottom six player. Tatar has been elite at driving play.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hisch13r

brakeyawself

Registered User
Oct 5, 2006
1,600
943
View attachment 459628 Tatar’s gf/wife on his Instagram is an absolute smoke show. Stunning.

Poor guy. Major Melania vibes. I wonder if he checked the expiration date yet. He looks a little nervous. He's got a "as long as I keep playing everything will be ok" look on his face. Or maybe it's a "shes beautiful but does she always have to embarrass me like this" grin. Hard to tell.
 
Last edited:

Guttersniped

Satan’s Wallpaper
Sponsor
Dec 20, 2018
22,787
51,040
He wasn't even better this year. Similar overall production rate. Tatar with the decided 5v5 edge. Tatar drives play. Zacha doesn't. Even if he was slightly better this year it was off of the back of an incredibly unsustainable shooting year.
Also if you look at Goals Against, Zacha has some real issues, this is ignoring defense. The focus on raw production per game doesn’t take into account on Zacha having way more playing time too.

5v5 points/60: Zacha: 1.7 Tatar: 2.0

total points/60: Zacha: 2.4 Tatar: 2.4

Tartar had a slightly down season compared to his first two seasons in Montreal which were his most productive ever. He worked very well with Danault and Gallagher, it was just a great match.

I do think Tampa had the right approach of limiting the number of wingers they had, centers make line matching easier. It’s funny that Habs fans are crapping on the Tatar signing when Hoffman is much tougher to fit in their line-up, particularly with their center depth. They have deal with Drouin and he won’t help when Kotkaniemi is the 2nd line center. That’s the tough part of adding wingers, with the Habs no line-up makes sense, jigsaw puzzle with pieces from different puzzles. Hopefully Tatar finds a good match here. (He did have a better regular season than Zacha though, for what it’s worth.)
 

brakeyawself

Registered User
Oct 5, 2006
1,600
943
Tarasenko shoulder is now actually fixed and hes going to smoke Tatar numbers wise. I'd be willing to bet money on that.

Wouldn't count on that. He has a habit of just finding a new route to the press box or disappearing from games. And even if not, he hasn't really been that player since 18-19 and that was still a bit of a down year for him. He's a weird player. Everyone knows what he's capable of it's just a matter of "is he worth the money " and "will he get it back". And I don't think either can be answered until he does or doesn't. He's a risk, but might be a risk worth taking. I just wouldn't want him at his current contract, especially with base salary this season. But it's only 2 years left on that. I would say, if a team thinks they are contending this season and next, it's a risk worth taking for them. For a team where the Devils are at, I am not so sure. The Blues seem to have soured on him. or he soured on them, maybe a bit of both. Even though he's "their baby".

But he theoretically will be performing for a new contract over the next 2 seasons. So it could be lightning in a bottle.
 
Last edited:

StevenToddIves

Registered User
May 18, 2013
11,087
28,038
Brooklyn, NY
lol No he isn't.

Last year, Tatar had 10 goals and 30 points in 50 games and was a healthy scratch for his team in the playoffs. Last year, Zacha had 17 goals and 35 points and was the best player on his team for multiple stretches. This is not a "lol no he isn't" because this is not three years ago. Tatar is a 30 year old who was a 2nd line winger in his prime, which is behind him. Zacha was the better player last year.
 

StevenToddIves

Registered User
May 18, 2013
11,087
28,038
Brooklyn, NY
Zacha was better this season.

That's the thing...Are we getting a .9 ppg version of Tatar or are we getting a .6 ppg version?

And is that .6 down from .9 the beginning of decline? Because Zacha at .7 ppg has shown improvement in each of his seasons in the NHL.

Tatar is unlikely to get better from his 30 year old season to his 31 year old season. He has been a healthy scratch in the playoffs multiple times in multiple seasons. I'm not putting him down, he's a solid scoring winger. But the people who think he was better than Zacha last year did not watch Canadiens games until the playoffs last year, when Tatar rarely played. They're looking at analytic charts.
 

NJDevs26

Once upon a time...
Mar 21, 2007
68,533
34,108
I feel like the Johnsson hate has gotta be one of the most overblown things I've seen on this board. I'm not a fan either but we've had like twenty scrubs that were just as bad over the last decade. And didn't get COVID?

Most of those scrubs aren't getting paid $3.4 million per on a three-year deal (now two) either.
 

The 29th Pick

Still Alive !
Dec 7, 2007
19,430
6,641
Northvale N.J.
Tatar is unlikely to get better from his 30 year old season to his 31 year old season. He has been a healthy scratch in the playoffs multiple times in multiple seasons. I'm not putting him down, he's a solid scoring winger. But the people who think he was better than Zacha last year did not watch Canadiens games until the playoffs last year, when Tatar rarely played. They're looking at analytic charts.

welcome to the "new" HF Boards
 
  • Like
Reactions: LeedsMonster

JimEIV

Registered User
Feb 19, 2003
67,715
30,552
www.quanthockey.com/nhl/seasons/2020-21-nhl-players-stats.html

I am not sure if this site is calling ES P/60 5v5, 4v4 and 3v3? They must be? Because their numbers don't match up with what gets quoted here for 5v5 regularly...Hockey Reference also uses "EV" scoring (EVEN)

Regardless QuantHockey list Zacha as:
2.192 ES P/60 93rd in the league
2.448 P/60 92md in the league

They list Tatar as:
2.040 ES P/60 117th in the league
2.402 P/60 98th in the league

I certainly do understand the importance of 5v5 scoring - But in this case, if we are eliminating success Zacha has had 4v4 and 3v3 and trying claim Tatar had a "better season" based on a subset of the total Even Strength scoring it starts to seem a little like bullshit? Don't you think?
 
Last edited:

Capt Nico Poo

Holik to HHOF
Nov 7, 2009
6,939
3,222
Finland
Last year, Tatar had 10 goals and 30 points in 50 games and was a healthy scratch for his team in the playoffs. Last year, Zacha had 17 goals and 35 points and was the best player on his team for multiple stretches. This is not a "lol no he isn't" because this is not three years ago. Tatar is a 30 year old who was a 2nd line winger in his prime, which is behind him. Zacha was the better player last year.

People bashing Zacha must be reading their 2019 notes or re-experiencing 2019 all over again. He was great last season. If he improves he is finally becoming a real asset.
 

Cheddabombs

Status Quo
Mar 13, 2012
25,605
34,625
Look I love Zacha as much as the next person, probably more, but he only played on the wing regularly this past season, and even then it wasn't too much. And while he did look much better there than at center, where he was pretty bad let's be honest, it was still a small sample size.

I am a firm believer if he continues to play wing he'll grow into a solid top 6 player. I'm not writing it in stone just yet though.

And why pit Tatar and Zacha against each other like this, they're on the same team now!
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad