Puckclektr
Registered User
At least they aren’t throwing jerseys.Leafs just had an icing called for a puck that didn't even cross the goal line
Are the fans going to throw beer on the ice for that too?
At least they aren’t throwing jerseys.Leafs just had an icing called for a puck that didn't even cross the goal line
Are the fans going to throw beer on the ice for that too?
No, the rules are clear on that and address it. Deflection does not matter. That was 100% the right no goal callisnt 3rd goal fine cuz the puck went off a leaf skate.
like how can u kick the puck to ur stick but not center it into the slot
I mean, Marner got a stick chopped in the face with a stick, in front of the refs, and they didn't call a penalty. A linesman had to step in and do it.Why wasn’t there a penalty called then?
You sure sound like an expert!
3 goals called back. Of course fans are pissed. Not shocking at all.
I mean, multiple people have quoted it already. It's not incidental contact if you take the route between the goalie and the net as he's moving back to the net.
You know the route he's taking, it's the same as when somebody throws a pick by skating behind a PKer when you're making a zone entry. This happens every so often and is called interference whenever it is seen.
You are telling me that the third goal wasnt a blatant kicking motion?Bruins fan here...honestly can't blame them those were some tacky ass calls except for the 2nd
Context for anyone: 3 disallowed goals for the Devs
Nothing in the rulebook says "lane" or "route to the net", you're making this up. Feel free to point out otherwise.I mean, multiple people have quoted it already. It's not incidental contact if you take the route between the goalie and the net as he's moving back to the net.
You know the route he's taking, it's the same as when somebody throws a pick by skating behind a PKer when you're making a zone entry. This happens every so often and is called interference whenever it is seen.
So you're justifying them throwing shit on the ice and on the players? Pretty sure they even threw shit at Leafs players after the game but the camera cut away.
All 3 goals called back were legit.
isnt 3rd goal fine cuz the puck went off a leaf skate.
like how can u kick the puck to ur stick but not center it into the slot
For sure, it should have been a penalty. Refs need to do betterWhy wasn’t there a penalty called then?
You sure sound like an expert!
I mean, Marner got a stick chopped in the face with a stick, in front of the refs, and they didn't call a penalty. A linesman had to step in and do it.
When the fans threw shit on the ice, instead of issuing a delay of game penalty to the home team, as required by the rules, they didn't.
Why wasn't a tripping penalty issued to Tatar? Who knows.
Well considering you are coming from Toronto you would be driving though NJ to get to NYC. Plenty of great things in NJ but you are probably to ignorant to know about them.Why would I step foot in NJ when NYC is right there?
This started being a thing when Lucic crushed Miller.I mean, multiple people have quoted it already. It's not incidental contact if you take the route between the goalie and the net as he's moving back to the net.
You know the route he's taking, it's the same as when somebody throws a pick by skating behind a PKer when you're making a zone entry. This happens every so often and is called interference whenever it is seen.
For sure, it should have been a penalty. Refs need to do better
Probably "game management" for not calling one when Murray intentionally knocked the net off to get a change.Leafs had to leave the bench and there was no delay of game penalty? Wtf is the nhl doing
Nothing in the rulebook says "lane" or "route to the net", you're making this up. Feel free to point out otherwise.
View attachment 612149
Where do you see him make a reasonable effort to avoid contact here? He's skating on the same curve and speed pretty much the whole way through.
Actually? Spot on“rEnT fReE”
Am I doing this right, Leaf fans?