Devils fans throw beer on ice, Leafs bench. Cause delay of game.

[The Crypto Guy]

Disgrace. Grow up.

 

[MettleMcOiler]

Throwing full cans onto the ice could seriously injure a player, referee or personnel on the bench.
The result doesn't excuse the fan in acting with such poor etiquette.
That should be an automatic ban for throwing full cans, it's shows carelessness and lack of consideration of the players safety on the ice.

 

[Voight]

There isn't a fan base alive that wouldn't lose it on home ice with 3 disallowed goals in one game.

Coyotes

 

[Captain3rdLine]

The second goal, the only question was if tatar deserved a 2 min penalty for goalie interference or not...

The 1st ine, you can arge but

1- he was on goalie circle
2- nobody push him
3- he created contact with murray skate
4- that affected Murray ability to make the stop
5- Murray was in good position to make the save without contact

Hit every case of goalie interference... yes 3 goal dissallowed is pretty impresive but every call was the right call.

Its not a special offer, score 2 illegal goal and the 3rd will count

The ref didn’t call Tatar for a penalty. Once he didn’t give Tatar a penalty that goal should count by the rule book

not even close. All were clearly the right calls.

No the second one clearly wasn’t. There is no possible argument for calling the second one being the right call. Once the ref didn’t call a penalty on Tatar it’s a goal. That’s not debatable. Whether Tatar should’ve been called for a penalty is debatable. Either way ref made up his own rules

 

[Xirik]

I've been to a few Flyers games and never seen anything like this. Its too bad the coward refs didn't call the deserved delay of game on the fans, I wanted to see a literal barn burner.

It doesn't help that whoever is in charge of replays at Prudential mysteriously cut out the parts where Murray was interfered with. Like they showed Murray falling down but not being tripped and fans were screaming "BUT HE DIDN'T TOUCH HIM", lol.

 

[Captain3rdLine]

The puck went in directly where Murray's foot would have been if Bastian didn't block it.

Honestly, all 3 were easy calls, I don't really get the outrage or the confusion. Maybe the rules are bad, that's a different conversation.

The second one clearly went against the rule book.

Seeing a lot of people talk about reading the rule book and understanding it when they clearly don’t themselves.

 

[severian]

What a waste of over priced shitty beer

Overpriced but the selection has actually gotten a bit better. 60 minute ipa is basically the same price as bud lite at the prudential center.

 

[Captain3rdLine]

I will say. If they said the first goal, was a goal...I wouldn't be too upset as a Leaf fan. Although, ref called it off on the ice and good luck overturning - if there's a shred of uncertainty.

Other 2. Simple calls imo, that were amplified due to the miss on #1

The 2nd one was the most clear cut. It blatantly went against the rulebook

 

[SaltNPeca]

Yeah the most hated thing is more of a Canada deal. In the states they're treated with relative indifference.

There's no shame in loosing a game to the Leafs in particular, especially in the Regular season. Loosing a playoff series would be unprecedented, maybe grounds for a riot in Canada (& Boston?).

 

[Clam Jensen]

Also:

 

[Sypher04]

It’s a bad look but I can kinda understand tbh. As a Leaf fan, I absolutely think the first Jersey goal should have counted. To then be assessed a minor due to the failed coach’s challenge is insult to injury and honestly set the stage for the crowd’s reactions to the next two even if they were imo both textbook no goal situations. That first goal stands and the Devils are battling for the win and keeping their streak alive in OT instead, so I get it.

 

[Ezekial]

We had a ref call back a goal because of a pick play in Game 7 at home. It's happened multiple times this season in the regular season already and nothing has been called.

The goal wasn't called back, an interference penalty was called before the goal was scored. Can believe you're still complaining about it.

 

[Captain3rdLine]

I've covered the rule extensively, try reading parts you did not highlight. The league reviewed the goal and determined it was no goal, which was the correct call. Although these plays are rare, they have been very consistent on these calls over the years when they have come up.

Huh no they haven’t the devils had a goal just like that count against not that long ago. What parts didn’t he quote, pretty sure you just made some bs without having read it yourself. If there’s something in the rulebook we’ve missed please enlighten us. Otherwise based on the rulebook once he doesn’t call a penalty on Tatar for a penalty it’s a goal. Unless you just make up your own rules along the way.

 

[TheFinalWord]

The 2nd one was the most clear cut. It blatantly went against the rulebook

You're right. The Leafs should have been on the powerplay as well.

 

[Captain3rdLine]

You're right. The Leafs should have been on the powerplay as well.

Whether Tatar should’ve been given a penalty is debatable. But once the ref didn’t give him one it’s a goal. There’s no argument that’s what the rulebook says.

*Referees do their job and make obvious calls*

Devils fans who don't know the rules

View attachment 612345

View attachment 612346

The irony in you guys not actually knowing/understanding the rules or the fact that the refs didn’t do their job properly on the second goal.

 

[HugeInTheShire]

No Devil fan should be okay with what happened last night, 3 judgement calls that all went against NJ is crazy.

I can see why each goal was called back, doesn't mean I agree with calling all 3 back but what I don't agree with is throwing shit onto the ice for it, especially throwing it at the Leaf players that didn't have anything to do with the calls against NJ.

NJ absolutely should have received a delay of game penalty for delaying the game, sure Murray intentionally knocking the net off should have been called as well but that doesn't make what Devil fans did any more acceptable.

 

[AcerComputer]

Huh no they haven’t the devils had a goal just like that count against not that long ago. What parts didn’t he quote, pretty sure you just made some bs without having read it yourself. If there’s something in the rulebook we’ve missed please enlighten us. Otherwise based on the rulebook once he doesn’t call a penalty on Tatar for a penalty it’s a goal. Unless you just make up your own rules along the way.

Please post the link with timestamp.

You can trace back my earlier comments where I responded to other posters on the parts of the rules that apply. I am not reposting what I wrote. It's been covered.

 

[waitin425]

The only thing that should be thrown on the ice during any leafs game is a waffle.

If it's not a waffle.....grow up.

 

[unicornpig]

lol if toronto fans cry about reffing ever again.

 

[Blender]

Please post the link with timestamp.

You can trace back my earlier comments where I responded to other posters on the parts of the rules that apply. I am not reposting what I wrote. It's been covered.

Check your notifications. I responded to your post with a clip of the goal. You didn't respond to it.

Devils fans throw beer on ice, Leafs bench. Cause delay of game.

Hockey player's sign up for the possibility of being hit with a slap shot, that is a potential outcome that can occur while playing the game They don't sign up for being hit with cans full of beer from height We're talking about what is considered dangerous. Of course they don't sign up to...

forums.hfboards.com

 

[Captain3rdLine]

You can trace back my earlier comments where I responded to other posters on the parts of the rules that apply. I am not reposting what I wrote. It's been covered.

Lmao that might be the most bs interpretation of a rule I’ve ever seen. You take the part about the goalie having the right to move freely in his crease and defend his goal and say Tatar stopped him from defending his goal. The part you pulled was clearly about in the crease not outside of it. Lol the rulebook clearly says if there’s incidental contact outside of the crease the goal should stand. The ref determined that the contact was incidental when he didn’t give Tatar a penalty.

 

[Sypher04]

No Devil fan should be okay with what happened last night, 3 judgement calls that all went against NJ is crazy.

I can see why each goal was called back, doesn't mean I agree with calling all 3 back but what I don't agree with is throwing shit onto the ice for it, especially throwing it at the Leaf players that didn't have anything to do with the calls against NJ.

NJ absolutely should have received a delay of game penalty for delaying the game, sure Murray intentionally knocking the net off should have been called as well but that doesn't make what Devil fans did any more acceptable.

The first goal disallowed was the botched call I’d say. The other two seemed pretty clear cut no goals imo.

 

[glenwo2]

what a spoiled freakin fanbase

Which one?

 

[Captain3rdLine]

The first goal disallowed was the botched call I’d say. The other two seemed pretty clear cut no goals imo.

The second one blatantly went against the rulebook

 

[AcerComputer]

Lmao that might be the most bs interpretation of a rule I’ve ever seen. You take the part about the goalie having the right to move freely in his crease and defend his goal and say Tatar stopped him from defending his goal. The part you pulled was clearly about in the crease not outside of it. Lol the rulebook clearly says if there’s incidental contact outside of the crease the goal should stand.

Well that is how the NHL applies the rule, maybe call them. You can't interfere with a goalie trying to get back into his net - incidental or not, white ice or not. The goalie has the right to defend his net, as per rule#1. As per rule#2 the player must make a reasonable effort to avoid contact. By cutting off the goalies path, this play is really dumb by the NJ player, and will go against you every time, otherwise we are in Sean Avery territory of knocking over the goalie " in order to score a goal.

Please send the link of the same goal that was allowed against NJ.