BenedictGomez
Corsi is GROSSLY overrated
Oh yeah, I forgot about that one play. Well that totally changes everything then.
Devils 2019 offseason team discussion (news and notes) XI
- Thread starter NJDevs26
- Start date
- Status
Oh yeah, I forgot about that one play. Well that totally changes everything then.
Zippy316
aka Zippo
I'm not sure if I still say Vatanen is better than Severson honestly.
2017-18, absolutely. Last year, I take Severson easily.
Zajacs Bowl Cut
Lets Go Baby
it always amuses me the vendetta people have against certain players
GMs around the league would kill to have a player like Severson especially given his age and contract status yet much of our fanbase hates the dude
GMs around the league would kill to have a player like Severson especially given his age and contract status yet much of our fanbase hates the dude
PizzaAndPucks
New Jersey Angels diehard
- Nov 29, 2018
- 2,990
- 4,828
Vatanen is an average top 4 d man. I would love for him to stick around longer at the right price because I'm a fan of his game but with Subban and Severson in the top 4 on RD we will be ok. Hopefully Walsh or another player can fight for that 3rd pairing spot after next season.
Zippy316
aka Zippo
Vatanen is going to be a great player to have around as 3RD who will play heavy PK minutes and can fill in on the PP if needed.
I just wonder if he'd be okay with playing that role as a pending UFA looking for his big pay day. I wouldn't be surprised if he asks for a trade for a better opportunity elsewhere where he can up his value as his long-term picture he doesn't look good.
That being said, it seems like the RHD market is oversaturated now after so many teams seemed to be in desperate need of them, so I don't know if Shero will be able to get the value for Vatanen he'd be looking for.
BomaLightDevils
Registered User
Things that affect your play, durability, points and so on off course is important for what type of contract you will receive but and this is very important "timing" is the buzz word for me. If vatanen comes out with a monster season he despite he's pass will get a very good contract. Teams are always desperate especially for a guy who just have had a great season. But like others have said because of severs and PK he will get limited minutes if injuries docent hit the team big time.
Call Me Al
Registered User
- Aug 28, 2017
- 5,686
- 7,249
Devil X
Call me Nostradamus
I’m not going to poo poo on Vatanen until it’s clear he’s been pushed down the lineup. Frankly right now I believe that Vatanen is the best bet to push Greene down to the second pairing unless we acquire a LHD. I know we are all super high on Ty Smith but the kids never played a minute in the NHL, I believe his future is bright but I’m not sure Id want him starting is career on the first pairing. If he earns it over time that’s fine but I think we need to have realistic expectations.
It’s very very possible that one of the RHD moves to the left side.
It’s very very possible that one of the RHD moves to the left side.
Zippy316
aka Zippo
Vatanen on LD will definitely be the first experiment going into next year just to get your four best defenders in the top four. I'm just skeptical it will work. Something like the following looks great on paper stylistically though:
Greene - Subban
Vatanen - Severson
Butcher - Carrick
Mueller
I think we may end up being better off balancing the pairings evenly playing Subban heavy PP minutes, Severson heavy 5-on-5 minutes, and Vatanen heavy PK minutes.
D3vilsH0ck3y
Registered User
- Jun 10, 2013
- 960
- 573
Why are people still missing Smith from the top 6? He is a lock to play in the NHL this season and I think he will exceed all expectations.
Honestly, this.
I hate to pencil a rookie in, but I don’t think people realize how much of a steal he was where we got him in the draft. Teams took inferior players because of his size.
I have high hopes for both him and Boqvist this fall.
Well, it's either that or one of Greene, Butcher, Smith, or Mueller playing 20+ minutes a night.
MauDevils
Registered User
Vatanen is incredibly overrated, but if Cody Ceci got 4.5...that means Vatanen is worth at least 20 million dollars a year.
Smith is truly the wildcard here. if he can give us top 4 quality defense then we can essentially run 3 2nd pairings at even strength
Greene-Severson
Smith-Subban
Butcher-Vatanen
or switch Vatanen and Severson
Greene-Severson
Smith-Subban
Butcher-Vatanen
or switch Vatanen and Severson
Edmonton East
BUT the ADvaNCEd STatS...
- Nov 25, 2007
- 6,566
- 2,558
Again, this team needs a Trouba-lite LD (ideally a Trouba, but they can't afford that). They need to add some size on defense and the org knows it. I've been saying this for well over a year. If you still disagree with me, take a look at how they drafted this year. And if you STILL some how disagree, read a couple post draft interviews with Shero and Castron where they flat out say they want to add size on the back-end in the organization.
There is going to have to be a shake up on D within the next year. Even if you assume Greene is toast after this year, Vats, Butcher, and Smith isn't gonna cut it (+Vats won't take bottom pair $ on RD). And the most obvious guy to move there is Vats.
Devils could add, but realistic player coming back needs to be 6'2+ LD that can put up 25-30 points, play PK, clear crease, and has decent mobility.
For the billionth time on here, just because size matters less in today's NHL, doesn't mean it's entirely irrelevant and you can trot out a defense with one guy above 6ft. How anyone can watch the playoffs each year and think that's feasible is beyond me at this point. Heck, the Bruins are often viewed as an "undersized" defensive unit and they still had Chara and Carlo playing 20+ a night.
There is going to have to be a shake up on D within the next year. Even if you assume Greene is toast after this year, Vats, Butcher, and Smith isn't gonna cut it (+Vats won't take bottom pair $ on RD). And the most obvious guy to move there is Vats.
Devils could add, but realistic player coming back needs to be 6'2+ LD that can put up 25-30 points, play PK, clear crease, and has decent mobility.
For the billionth time on here, just because size matters less in today's NHL, doesn't mean it's entirely irrelevant and you can trot out a defense with one guy above 6ft. How anyone can watch the playoffs each year and think that's feasible is beyond me at this point. Heck, the Bruins are often viewed as an "undersized" defensive unit and they still had Chara and Carlo playing 20+ a night.
Blender
Registered User
- Dec 2, 2009
- 52,698
- 46,482
I definitely think we should try and snag Lablanc or Gusev. Both teams are in cap hell and need to clear some salary going forward.
Nico the Draft Riser
Devils, Rams, Hawks, Twins fan
- Nov 18, 2017
- 3,351
- 1,367
What is your affinity for Greene on the top pair and Smith not in the NHL?
Youve posted those two things numerous times the last month or so
MauDevils
Registered User
Enough passers, this team needs goal scorers. Our top 6 has 4 combined 30 goal seasons and 50% of those are from Wayne Simmonds. Not a single 40 goal season from anyone.
Last season we had only two people break 20 goals...
Last season we had only two people break 20 goals...
Palmieri, Hall, and Simmonds are all top notch goal scorers. Bratt and Hischier both have excellent shots for setup men. St. Louis had one 30 goal scorer last season. Worked out pretty good for them.
I'd try müller with pk since he was the only defenseman actually playing defence last season.
MauDevils
Registered User
Palmieri and Hall have had one 30+ season each in their entire careers, not sure that is top notch. Before going down, Hall was on pace for 27 which was slightly above his career average. Wayne Simmonds just had 1 goal in 17 games for Nashville and didn't crack 20 last year.
I'm not sure St Louis is a good comparable to us considering they have far superior defense and goaltending. Not to mention Tarasenko alone has more 30 and 40 goal seasons than our entire top 6 combined.
Hall scored 39 in his last full season and Palmieri scored at a 30 goal pace in 2018-2019. What exactly is your point? You're seriously trying to diminish them because they didn't hit pretty round numbers? Okay?
BomaLightDevils
Registered User
Why?
I’ll 10/10 times play the better player out of position then play a guy way out of he’s comfort zone.
A good coach will do that every single game watch til the season starts.
Now the conversation gets interesting because I will guarantee that batsmen will play minimum top4 minutes almost each game.
It’s a pretty easy choice when you have PK and severson and then you have green who will play limited minutes 5on5 and heavy pk time.
If my prediction is wrong i will be so glad because then it means hopefully that Butcher and Smith have earned the minutes. If that happen you can ship vatanen away or you could have a top 4 defender playing the 5-6 position and you could deploy you defenseman in better environments to succeed.
- Status
