- Jul 2, 2017
- 2,933
- 2,877
A downfall with year over year improvement, simple methods and numbers are confusing people.. interesting.
I just wanted to show what you said was wrong that it looked like they were going to draft 7th overall, and your team would be drafting ahead of the Sens. Nothing more to it.
If it’s so early in the season as you say, why even bring it up
A downfall with year over year improvement, simple methods and numbers are confusing people.. interesting.
taylor hall had more 1st overall picks to work with.Poll: Who has the better downfall: Taylor Hall or the Detroit Red Wings ?
A great position?What Holland rebuild? He had a mandate to keep the team competitive. He did that until it was no longer possible and then traded UFAs and hoarded picks while not tying the team to any bad long term contracts.
He left Yzerman in a great position with tonnes of picks and a good, young first line center.
What exactly had Yzerman added in 6 years outside of drafting/draft picks? Debrincat?
Stevie hasn't done much to put his stamp on. The team.
Yes the younger player in Raymond who was drafted higher and who’s scored more is definitely a lower ceilingImo Yzerman should be after Zegras. He immediately becomes their forward with the highest ceiling.
They had a 1C, some young forwards, and a young top 4 defenseman instead of cope about how some prospect that isn't scoring much is going to transform into a top 6 forward or top 4 defenseman or hanging your only hopes on Augustine and Buchelnikov. Holland wasn't perfect but he did an above average job with what he had, you'd think Yzerman would have more hits by random chance than he does.A great position?
They had a 1C and nothing else of real value.
They had top prospects of…. Zadina, Veleno, Cholowski
They were also a near cap team
What the hell are you talking about? Hahah
you'd think Yzerman would have more hits by random chance than he does.
Lol lost to the Sharks.
Gotta think the coach will be fired any hour now
A downfall with year over year improvement, simple methods and numbers are confusing people.. interesting.
I mean he has 5 on the team right now playing...
Mazur is injured, but he is NHL ready, so that's 6 right there. Not including ASP, Cossa, Danielsson, and MBN.
And US have won how many tournaments?
Last 3 seasons + start of this one:
Jack Eichel 182 games - 77 goals - 110 assists = 187 points
+/- of +41 on a contender
11 GWG, 3 SHP, 16 PPG, 55 PPP
Dylan Larkin 236 games - 106 goals - 124 assists = 230 points
+/- of -26 on a rebuild / up to bubble team
16 GWG, 4 SHP, 42 PPG, 70 PPP
Eichel is better and playing on a better team. But to say its a massive difference at this current time, has more to do with the Eichel hype of being 2nd overall and what he was expected to do vs. what he has done and that he had a better start to his career obviously.
Put Eichel on Detroit and Larkin on Vegas in these seasons and I don't think you'd get much difference other than it being reversed, maybe Eichel will upheld his point total and Larkin do better. That is the slight difference.
Playoffs impossible to tell, waiting until Larkin is on a good enough team.
Larkin is a 1C on a weak team. Larkin would be a 2C on a team with Eichel, which is the role best suited for him. The Wings are missing a high end 1C and 1D.It's hard to say that Eichel is riding his second overall hype when he's regularly been a point per game player on good and bad teams, when he had 26 pts in 22 games in the playoffs as the top centre on the Stanley Cup winner, and when he's regularly among the lead leaders in defensive impact.
Points tell one story, watching them tells more of it. One is an impact top centre and has proven it, the other is Larkin.
They look improved to you?A downfall with year over year improvement, simple methods and numbers are confusing people.. interesting.
The Red Wings organization did everything you are suppose to in order to rebuild fairly quickly. They have had a ton of 1st and 2nd round draft picks the last 7 drafts - 10 in the 1st round and 15 in the 2nd round. You should easily be able to build at least a strong play-off team by now with that, if not an elite team.
The obvious major failure here is drafting. It has been monumentally bad.
Bad drafting from 2015, 2016, especially 2017, and 2018 is hurting us so much right now.The Red Wings organization did everything you are suppose to in order to rebuild fairly quickly. They have had a ton of 1st and 2nd round draft picks the last 7 drafts - 10 in the 1st round and 15 in the 2nd round. You should easily be able to build at least a strong play-off team by now with that, if not an elite team.
The obvious major failure here is drafting. It has been monumentally bad.
It's not really Lalonde that's the problem. The team sucks. The coach is getting the output that should be reasonably expected of this roster.Lol. They're about to lose to San Jose (who has 10 more shots than they do).
It would be a slap in the face to the fans if Lalonde is allowed to coach this team any longer.