- Jul 20, 2005
- 4,923
- 2,329
The Rangers seem pretty committed to the argument of "Well, we can offer $3M per -- a dime more would hurt our already perilous cap situation."
I doubt they move off of it, even if it is an extremely weak argument. They have the leverage, so truth be told, they don't have to have a strong argument.
Stepan would just be hurting his value for his next contract by missing regular season games.
I agree that the ire will be directed at Stepan. But guess where I place the lion's share of the blame? How about the GM that has more poor signings than I can count crying cap poverty in negotiations with his homegrown #1 center? Hows that for cajones?
I doubt that is the Rangers position at all.
The Rangers do not give out larger than necessary contracts to players who have no leverage. It's not just about Stepan. It's about Stepan and every player/agent that comes after him.