Oh sorry I meant how much in the whole series.
0p -3 17 hits (7 game 1, 5 game 2, 0 game 3, 1 game 4, 3 game 5, 1 game 6)
Oh sorry I meant how much in the whole series.
5 hits in the last four games... what the ****0p -3 17 hits (7 game 1, 5 game 2, 0 game 3, 1 game 4, 3 game 5, 1 game 6)
here's the thing i don't get: [MOD] Coach is so concerned about pacing the sedins and not giving them too many minutes and keeping them fresh. why doesn't he have that concern with doesett? Clearly the numbers above show he faded in the series, and he didn't look as energetic as the first 2 games.
I wish one of our sports journalists would ask a question along these lines.
Exactly. That's why we've all been pissed at Willie giving Dorsett more than 10-ish mins a night. He can be effective when he plays limited minutes and can go balls-to-the-wall. When he has more than he can handle, he can't do that and tires out when he tries.
Do you think Willie feels pressure / has been pressured to play Dorsett more because of the contract that Benning just gave him?
Would reflect badly on Benning if someone he just signed long term and gave a raise to was getting less than 10 minutes of ice time per game.
We likely so the very best that Dorsett has to offer yet it still wasn't any better than a 3rd/4th liner. Why WillieD played him so much is beyond me.
The first two games he was on the periphery as well. It comes down to him not being fresh at all, because he was overplayed ALL SEASON.here's the thing i don't get: [MOD] Coach is so concerned about pacing the sedins and not giving them too many minutes and keeping them fresh. why doesn't he have that concern with doesett? Clearly the numbers above show he faded in the series, and he didn't look as energetic as the first 2 games.
I wish one of our sports journalists would ask a question along these lines.
Yeah, he was completely neutered against the Flames. Doesn't give you much hope for how he'd perform against an actual cup caliber team in the playoffs.
here's the thing i don't get: [MOD] Coach is so concerned about pacing the sedins and not giving them too many minutes and keeping them fresh. why doesn't he have that concern with doesett? Clearly the numbers above show he faded in the series, and he didn't look as energetic as the first 2 games.
I wish one of our sports journalists would ask a question along these lines.
Much rather have a player like Burrows show Virtanen what it means to be a canuck than someone that has been here for 1 year.
I guess you apparently have to surround your top prospects with ****** players that are really nice guys off ice instead of surrounding with loyal Canuck guys that bleed blue green who also happen to be good players.
Who knew that a Virtanen could learn more from playing with some with no talent than learn from someone with talent.
I really don't get the concept how Dorsett is a good mentor because he works real hard. Every single NHL player works hard, there are only a couple, if there are any at all, that can get by on talent alone while being lazy. The Sedins come into camp in better shape that any other player on the team year after year, if you want Virtanen mentored, send him to Sweden and spend a summer with the twins.
I mean you see guys spending their summer working out with Crosby, Parise etc. When was the last time you hear guys going out of their way to spend the summer with Derek Dorsett?
We need good players to mentor Virtanen on how to be a successful 1st line player, not how to be a successful 4th line mucker. We need a mentor that can give him advice on what to do in different situations not just go out there and skate real hard and achieve nothing. You learn from the best of the best, not from the best out of the crappiest bunch.
Saying that everyone in the NHL works hard is about as useful as saying everyone in the league is skilled.
And saying that Derek Dorsett works hard is basically scraping for positives because there are so few.
That is the problem with the logic of Dorsett is a good mentor because he works hard. Every single player works hard.
I really don't get the concept how Dorsett is a good mentor because he works real hard. Every single NHL player works hard, there are only a couple, if there are any at all, that can get by on talent alone while being lazy. The Sedins come into camp in better shape that any other player on the team year after year, if you want Virtanen mentored, send him to Sweden and spend a summer with the twins.
I mean you see guys spending their summer working out with Crosby, Parise etc. When was the last time you hear guys going out of their way to spend the summer with Derek Dorsett?
We need good players to mentor Virtanen on how to be a successful 1st line player, not how to be a successful 4th line mucker. We need a mentor that can give him advice on what to do in different situations not just go out there and skate real hard and achieve nothing. You learn from the best of the best, not from the best out of the crappiest bunch.
And saying that Derek Dorsett works hard is basically scraping for positives because there are so few.
That is the problem with the logic of Dorsett is a good mentor because he works hard. Every single player works hard.
In a general sense, sure, just like they're all skilled. There are obviously varying degrees of that, though, for both skill and hard work. I'll never marginalize the affect that hard work has… I'm honestly surprised that so many people here do. I feel like I learned a lot about the importance of hard work through hockey… I thought the people here would share that in common.
'Hard work' seems to have been lumped into a group with 'clutch' and put in the fantasy section. It's gross.
I think it's because there is a tendency to assume that less skilled players are "working harder" by default, for the same reason that guys who have an angry facial expression or more animated movements are assumed to care more, etc., or how defensemen who provide no offense are thought to be better at defending. It's a rationalization and it's based on superficial stuff. It probably is mythical, because it's always so predictable who gets tagged with the "hard-working" label -- less skilled North Americans who play a physical game.'Hard work' seems to have been lumped into a group with 'clutch' and put in the fantasy section. It's gross.
It isn't binary. Players work ethics and a multitude of other soft attributes (attitudes, leadership, etc) are a broad spectrum. Certainly compared to you and I they all "work hard", but within the NHL ranks there are still degrees of separation.
That said, I don't think Dorsett or Prust are considered "good mentors" simply because they work hard. As I've suggested in numerous posts, it is far more likely because they have a certain personality type - generous, approachable, etc - that makes them more suited to helping out a 19 yo kid learn the NHL ropes. Has nothing to do with skill or talent or working hard. Just comes down to being the right 'type' of person. Ryan Kesler was probably the hardest worker this team has had in recent years yet I don't get the impression he would have been willing to spend more than 5 minutes of his time helping out a young kid. Kesler's work ethic was all about Kesler, not other people.
Keep in mind I am not saying Virtanen should be placed on a line with Prust or Dorsett. In fact, I think that would be detrimental to his long-term development. Learning how to PLAY the game should definitely come from higher-end guys that can teach the nuances of timing, positioning, etc. This is where spending time ON THE ICE with the Sedins, Burrows, etc would be the way to go.
But there is nothing wrong with rooming Virtanen with Dorsett/Prust and letting them help these kids make the transition to NHL life.
They are two separate things.