Proposal: DEFENCE to Leafs

BCNate

Registered User
Apr 3, 2016
3,354
3,353
I could see Luke Schenn being available at the deadline assuming the Canucks are outside of the playoff race. He has been playing excellent in his role in Vancouver, is RH, on a league min deal and has won the last 2 cups. Based on that, whoever gets him is likely to win the cup. He would provide solid depth and would not be a high cost to acquire.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SHANNYPLAN

bernmeister

Registered User
Jun 11, 2010
28,614
4,190
Da Big Apple
None of NY's quality D corp is available, and a late 1st next coupla years does not cut it.

Given that, only thing appealing for NY to consider is

Strome [projects can be available/extended 4 yrs 5.25 per] retained to 2.25

Jones elc, lefty but can play right side -- only prospect available due to he is Fox lite [way lite comp to Fox, obv, but still an apt descrip]

Geo expiring retained to half is 1+

Hajek < 1 expiring

NYR 2022 2nd

for

Nylander
+
Holl
+
Leafs 2022 1st

something like that

and if Leaf base doesn't want to go there, fine
take yr chances w/a vet D rental w/mileage, a name one will still cost
 

Leaf Fans

Registered User
Sep 29, 2017
21,088
9,168
None of NY's quality D corp is available, and a late 1st next coupla years does not cut it.

Given that, only thing appealing for NY to consider is

Strome [projects can be available/extended 4 yrs 5.25 per] retained to 2.25

Jones elc, lefty but can play right side -- only prospect available due to he is Fox lite [way lite comp to Fox, obv, but still an apt descrip]

Geo expiring retained to half is 1+

Hajek < 1 expiring

NYR 2022 2nd

for

Nylander
+
Holl
+
Leafs 2022 1st

something like that

and if Leaf base doesn't want to go there, fine
take yr chances w/a vet D rental w/mileage, a name one will still cost
I think it is more likely that the Leafs will take their chances on a better deal.
 

Dr Quincy

Registered User
Jun 19, 2005
29,368
11,679
None of NY's quality D corp is available, and a late 1st next coupla years does not cut it.

Given that, only thing appealing for NY to consider is

Strome [projects can be available/extended 4 yrs 5.25 per] retained to 2.25

Jones elc, lefty but can play right side -- only prospect available due to he is Fox lite [way lite comp to Fox, obv, but still an apt descrip]

Geo expiring retained to half is 1+

Hajek < 1 expiring

NYR 2022 2nd

for

Nylander
+
Holl
+
Leafs 2022 1st

something like that

and if Leaf base doesn't want to go there, fine
take yr chances w/a vet D rental w/mileage, a name one will still cost

OP asks for D help.

You offer a crap backup goalie, an offensive middle 6 C and prospects.

I won't even get into what you ask for back and why that's ridiculous... but just on the package going to TOR you've not even given a split second to how that fills any needs. It's just the same "I want to trade these guys from my team... now give me something good for them."
 

bernmeister

Registered User
Jun 11, 2010
28,614
4,190
Da Big Apple
OP asks for D help.

You offer a crap backup goalie, an offensive middle 6 C and prospects.

I won't even get into what you ask for back and why that's ridiculous... but just on the package going to TOR you've not even given a split second to how that fills any needs. It's just the same "I want to trade these guys from my team... now give me something good for them."

Jones is a signif D prospect; you ignoring that fact does not change my accurate assertion.
It is a gamble, but he played well enuf in training camp to make the club.
Exceptionally poised, he should be able to contribute immediately.

As I explained, you have no other assets available of interest to NYR.
Either Strome + Jones + for Nylander + or forget it.

Also, we have now observed and proven by trial and error that Geo runs hot and cold, but is much better with sufficiently regular work. He is not premier top shelf but he is not crap

You need to revise your remarks to acknowledge the above.
 

Bouboumaster

Registered User
Jul 4, 2014
10,755
9,217
Pick anyone out of Petry, Chiarot or Edmunson and send us a #1 pick our way (+ if it's Petry) and you're set
 

Tarmore

Registered User
Nov 11, 2008
1,164
669
Ghostisbehere could be had for a prospect and pick most likely from the Leafs. It would however, probably cost you more than you're willing to pay and make a lot of Leafs fans irrationally angry.

No x2

No not worth a prospect and a pick to the Leafs as they need a Defensive defenseman, doesn't matter if it's a D prospect and a 7th

No (and this is the bigger one of the 2 listed) can't afford. See Salary Cap
 

zodiacbiller

Registered User
Sep 7, 2021
341
179
Insane thread. Leafs have been an elite defensive team and have allowed 3+ goals in five straight games in part because they got banged up, in part because stuff happens, and in part because four of their games were against the Avalanche, Wild, Jets, and Lightning. Those are talented scoring teams. There's no urgent need, and the Leafs don't have the cap space to add early anyway. Rielly, Brodie, Muzzin, Sandin, Liljegren, Dermott, and Holl are a good defense group, and buying now rather than at the deadline doesn't do you any favors because the additional retention required will cost enough to make up for the deadline premium.
 

zodiacbiller

Registered User
Sep 7, 2021
341
179
Pick anyone out of Petry, Chiarot or Edmunson and send us a #1 pick our way (+ if it's Petry) and you're set

Chiarot wouldn't be one of the Leafs' top seven defensemen, and Petry and Edmundson would require pretty significant retention given the Leafs' situation. Even if the Habs are rebuilding and willing to deal with the Leafs, it's just not a great fit. Petry or Edmundson might be good fits for the Red Wings if they're still in the race at the deadline.
 

Dr Quincy

Registered User
Jun 19, 2005
29,368
11,679
Jones is a signif D prospect; you ignoring that fact does not change my accurate assertion.
It is a gamble, but he played well enuf in training camp to make the club.
Exceptionally poised, he should be able to contribute immediately.

As I explained, you have no other assets available of interest to NYR.
Either Strome + Jones + for Nylander + or forget it.

Also, we have now observed and proven by trial and error that Geo runs hot and cold, but is much better with sufficiently regular work. He is not premier top shelf but he is not crap

You need to revise your remarks to acknowledge the above.
I'm not ignoring facts. You are offering a prospect D and a C that TOR doesn't need.
None of that is what the Leafs need in a Cup run. I mean, you know that, you aren't that dumb, so offer a legit top 4 D or don't make a proposal when that is what is asked for.

I mean, do you even bother to think for 2 seconds about what the other team actually wants or is it just about "here's some stuff"?

As far as your proposal, i'd say your "forget it" is the best option.
 

34

Registered User
Mar 26, 2010
21,835
9,733
Sandin is going to be a top pairing D man. I don’t see Dubas trading anymore 1sts or 2nds for older rentals. That has not fended well for him so far.
 

bernmeister

Registered User
Jun 11, 2010
28,614
4,190
Da Big Apple
I'm not ignoring facts. You are offering a prospect D and a C that TOR doesn't need.
None of that is what the Leafs need in a Cup run. I mean, you know that, you aren't that dumb, so offer a legit top 4 D or don't make a proposal when that is what is asked for.

I mean, do you even bother to think for 2 seconds about what the other team actually wants or is it just about "here's some stuff"?

As far as your proposal, i'd say your "forget it" is the best option.

happy to move on,
but just to be clear
whole thing here rests of quality of Jones as a prospect
it is clear he is good long term investment
while I am not saying he is lights out first pair day one,
I do believe based on eye test seen in camp,
he can play for Leafs now.

If you have dif op on that fine
but it is an opinion, not a fact
 

Hockey 4 Life

Registered User
Feb 10, 2012
6,270
3,259
None of NY's quality D corp is available, and a late 1st next coupla years does not cut it.

Given that, only thing appealing for NY to consider is

Strome [projects can be available/extended 4 yrs 5.25 per] retained to 2.25

Jones elc, lefty but can play right side -- only prospect available due to he is Fox lite [way lite comp to Fox, obv, but still an apt descrip]

Geo expiring retained to half is 1+

Hajek < 1 expiring

NYR 2022 2nd

for

Nylander
+
Holl
+
Leafs 2022 1st

something like that

and if Leaf base doesn't want to go there, fine
take yr chances w/a vet D rental w/mileage, a name one will still cost
None of what you proposed would get Nylander alone. Your idea of value to other teams is terrible.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ciao

EquivalentStay

Registered User
Jul 27, 2020
295
417
None of NY's quality D corp is available, and a late 1st next coupla years does not cut it.

Given that, only thing appealing for NY to consider is

Strome [projects can be available/extended 4 yrs 5.25 per] retained to 2.25

Jones elc, lefty but can play right side -- only prospect available due to he is Fox lite [way lite comp to Fox, obv, but still an apt descrip]

Geo expiring retained to half is 1+

Hajek < 1 expiring

NYR 2022 2nd

for

Nylander
+
Holl
+
Leafs 2022 1st

something like that

and if Leaf base doesn't want to go there, fine
take yr chances w/a vet D rental w/mileage, a name one will still cost

And the LEAFS add a first? You're out of you dang mind, buddy. Worst proposal I've seen in a long time.
 

Funk21

Registered User
Mar 6, 2013
4,390
1,896
Toronto
Leafs fans crying about Justin Holl is so weird. He's a #4D making 2m. Stop trying to prove that you're cool and knowledgeable hockey fans by shitting on a perfectly good player. His contract is one of the best on the team for what he brings. Seriously, hockey fans have absolutely no idea what #4-6 defensemen actually look like. It's like y'all expect Chris Tanev as a bare minimum.

The issue is he is not a number 4. At best he is a 6/7 this year. I would trade him in a heartbeat if we could get a marginal upgrade with term and around the same AAV if it doesn’t cost us an arm and a leg. That is not using our first or second this year. A player like Mayfield from the NYI. I would be comfy packaging Dermott with him to get a physical bottom pairing RHD with term.

Rielly Brodie
Muzzin Liljegren
Sandin ?????
 

LeafGrief

Shambles in my brain
Apr 10, 2015
7,911
10,189
Ottawa
The issue is he is not a number 4. At best he is a 6/7 this year. I would trade him in a heartbeat if we could get a marginal upgrade with term and around the same AAV if it doesn’t cost us an arm and a leg. That is not using our first or second this year. A player like Mayfield from the NYI. I would be comfy packaging Dermott with him to get a physical bottom pairing RHD with term.

Rielly Brodie
Muzzin Liljegren
Sandin ?????
Yeah he was only a #4 for two years. Fans who are willing to toss a guy who was a #4 for two years in the trash after 30 bad games are laughable. How many solid #4D cost 2m and can be had for less than an arm and a leg? RHD are one of the most coveted positions in the league, we heard for 3 straight years that the only way to get one was to trade Nylander. Holl has 30 bad games and you're pencilling a kid with 30 total NHL games under his belt into the spot.

The Leafs should upgrade at every position whenever and wherever possible. If Dubas trades to upgrade on Holl, I'll live. But fans are always restless and look to trade instead of giving players an inch of rope to sort themselves out. You trade Holl and he bounces back on his new team, great the Leafs now look like huge idiots for trading a 2m #4D which is literally exactly the player that we need. We have the guy with the right history and the right contract, just have some patience with the guy for f***'s sakes.
 

Funk21

Registered User
Mar 6, 2013
4,390
1,896
Toronto
Yeah he was only a #4 for two years. Fans who are willing to toss a guy who was a #4 for two years in the trash after 30 bad games are laughable. How many solid #4D cost 2m and can be had for less than an arm and a leg? RHD are one of the most coveted positions in the league, we heard for 3 straight years that the only way to get one was to trade Nylander. Holl has 30 bad games and you're pencilling a kid with 30 total NHL games under his belt into the spot.

The Leafs should upgrade at every position whenever and wherever possible. If Dubas trades to upgrade on Holl, I'll live. But fans are always restless and look to trade instead of giving players an inch of rope to sort themselves out. You trade Holl and he bounces back on his new team, great the Leafs now look like huge idiots for trading a 2m #4D which is literally exactly the player that we need. We have the guy with the right history and the right contract, just have some patience with the guy for f***'s sakes.

Again throwing somebody on the second pairing and saying he is a number 4 is different than being a second pairing guy. The underlying analytics have said that for years and Muzzin basically has saved his bacon. He never should have been protected, yes RHD are valuable and at 2 million it’s not a terrible AAV but anything more than a bottom pairing is above his talent. Liljegren has surpassed him in his very limited play. He reads the play and has better position. Also skates ten times better. When his confidence is there we are going to a true top 4, maybe even a number 2/3. Baby steps.

As for replacing him I think there are few options but Mayfield fits the bill. Big, Physical and isn't a black hole offensively. What would it take? Good question but neither of our 2022 top picks should be involved.
 

NYR425

Registered User
Sep 30, 2005
612
159
How about Rangers trade (D) Patrik Nemeth, (D) Zach Jones and (F) Vitaly Kravtsov to Maple Leafs for (F) Matthew Knies. Both Nemeth and Jones could step in this season and you get the wild card in Kravtsov. Think the Rangers are giving up a lot but you have to give to get and I like Knies as a prospect. Would this work?
 

LeafGrief

Shambles in my brain
Apr 10, 2015
7,911
10,189
Ottawa
Again throwing somebody on the second pairing and saying he is a number 4 is different than being a second pairing guy. The underlying analytics have said that for years and Muzzin basically has saved his bacon. He never should have been protected, yes RHD are valuable and at 2 million it’s not a terrible AAV but anything more than a bottom pairing is above his talent. Liljegren has surpassed him in his very limited play. He reads the play and has better position. Also skates ten times better. When his confidence is there we are going to a true top 4, maybe even a number 2/3. Baby steps.

As for replacing him I think there are few options but Mayfield fits the bill. Big, Physical and isn't a black hole offensively. What would it take? Good question but neither of our 2022 top picks should be involved.
If Muzzin is saving Holl's bacon and Holl is making 2m, that is called chemistry and should be valued. JT made a career of making average wingers look great, if Jake Muzzin is dragging Holl to top4 results and we can get away with a 2m player in that spot then you should be building a statue for Muzzin and using the cap savings elsewhere. It's the #4 defenseman spot, you don't need a guy who can carry a pairing to play there.

I've laid out my position. This is all make believe any ways, so carry on.
 

bernmeister

Registered User
Jun 11, 2010
28,614
4,190
Da Big Apple
How about Rangers trade (D) Patrik Nemeth, (D) Zach Jones and (F) Vitaly Kravtsov to Maple Leafs for (F) Matthew Knies. Both Nemeth and Jones could step in this season and you get the wild card in Kravtsov. Think the Rangers are giving up a lot but you have to give to get and I like Knies as a prospect. Would this work?

no from NY, too much
the guy is a worthwhile target, kudos to you there

but adding Krav is way too much = giving him away
elite prospects has Knies pre draft rankings no better than like 37th, most considerably higher (ie worse)

We can do
Jones + Reunanen
for
Knies +

keep Nemeth another half yr to finish getting Nils L acclimated

Jones has Fox lite potential.
Is surplus and has to go but want best return there

Knies + a good +
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad