NORiculous
Registered User
Hughes said he did not see him there. So that’s not why he was drafted.People may not see him in the #1PP
Hughes said he did not see him there. So that’s not why he was drafted.People may not see him in the #1PP
I have not seen a single post of someone shushing I’ll will on a player. HuGo on the other hand…
Future D-core looks bright:
Reinbacher (#1-2 potential)
Guhle (#1-2 potential)
Barron (top 4..pp specialist)
Mailloux (pp specialist)
Hutson (pp specialist)
Struble (underrated/gritty/tough)
Engstrom
I’m sure we will. But are we going to have another shot at a truly elite forward? I don’t know.Rebuild’s not done. They’ll get other pieces.
You are the first person to say that overall he was the fifth best prospect in the draft, and that only Arizona passed on him.Overall: he was the fifth best prospect of the draft and our strategic needs as an organization needed his upside.
The only team other than us who skipped on him was Arizona and they’re a mess in every way. They came dressed in identical suits.
If Reinbacher is a future 1D then it makes a lot more sense even if he isn’t a future Norris winner. If Reinbacher is a future 2D, as Hughes plainly states, then it’s right to question the organization’s commitment to take us to the next level.
This prospect, pegged as a truly elite forward, got 20 points in 30 KHL games as a rookie with lots of TOI and PP time.I’m sure we will. But are we going to have another shot at a truly elite forward? I don’t know.
I’m sure we will. But are we going to have another shot at a truly elite forward? I don’t know.
This prospect, pegged as a truly elite forward, got 20 points in 30 KHL games as a rookie with lots of TOI and PP time.
Jesperi Kotkaniemi, seven months YOUNGER than Michkov, got 29 points in 57 games as a rookie in the Liiga with 11:30 of TOI per game and little PP time
Alex Galchenyuk, nine months older than Michkov but having missed one full year of development, got 27 points in 48 games in the NHL with 12:19 TOI per game.
The NHL is often not kind to talented players without an extra gear to beat the best defenders in the world with, and maybe also without the inner hunger to compete and drive 24/7. And to top it off, Michkov is way smaller than those two talented players drafted at 3-OA.
Totally silly to argue this. Quick is a cherry-pick from rounds later. It’s like blaming the team for not drafting Hasek or Lidstrom. Several players went ahead of these guys.I remember that was one of the Price pick thing people were complaining about. They were right too. Kopitar + Quick > Price
Fans are just flat out starved for a scoring star and we passed on a guy with that potential. The frustration is completely understandable. But yeah, RB could easily turn out to be the right choice.Fans might not get it because it's an entertainment business, after all.. but GMs, Coaches, Teams, Players, all dream to have what Reinbacher can bring.
Size? check.
Skating? check.
Smarts? check.
No panic? check.
Defense? check.
Great shot? check.
Puck mover? check.
Jumps into rushes? check.
Good stick? check.
I don't think people are quantifying his draft year.
- A draft eligible DEFENSEMAN in one of the best PRO LEAGUES in the world became a GO-TO DEFENSEMAN and ran with it.
- He had the 2nd best PPG for a draft eligible in that pro league EVER behind Auston Matthews
- He went to the World Championships on a weak team and was their best defenseman prior to an injury.
- He did this without any hype, any portfolio following him, it was all merited by his play.
I was a Price supporter, still think it was the pick to make but I remember at the time people were complaining that Kopitar + Quick was better.Totally silly to argue this. Quick is a cherry-pick from rounds later. It’s like blaming the team for not drafting Hasek or Lidstrom. Several players went ahead of these guys.
And sorry but Price at his peak was considered a top five player in the league. If he doesn’t get hurt in 2015-16 he’d have back to back Hart trophies. Kopitar is a great player but at no point was he ever that good. We drafted the right guy.
He said he's not big on putting numbers on players. "There's a powerplay defenseman--is he your #1? Or is somebody that's shutting the play down on one end and then launching the attack on the other end? So I think he has potential to log significant minutes for our team."None of the top number 1 d lead in ice time without PP time. He described him as a 2nd pair dman when he said 2D.
There were people who started fire Hughes threads solely because of the pick - insisting Habs picked an inferior player - that Reinbacher was not BPA very extremely and that it was a historically bad pick. Imagine being an 18 year old reading that kind of nonsense. You probably missed it all, but people just need to calm down and root for the guy the Habs picked and put away the tar and feathers.Who is criticizing Reinbacher here though? I haven't seen many toxic posts like that. Most people, even hardcore Michkov fans, seem to agree he'll be a good one.
I think it also should be noted that the NL is on the upswing among the best leagues in Europe, it's more international and projects closer to what we are used to too. It historically hasn't been a very good league for development, but Reinbacher already putting up points at his age should suggest the idea that he has a low offensive ceiling just isn't true, even if he lacks the elite skills you want from a PP QB type.Fans might not get it because it's an entertainment business, after all.. but GMs, Coaches, Teams, Players, all dream to have what Reinbacher can bring.
Size? check.
Skating? check.
Smarts? check.
No panic? check.
Defense? check.
Great shot? check.
Puck mover? check.
Jumps into rushes? check.
Good stick? check.
I don't think people are quantifying his draft year.
- A draft eligible DEFENSEMAN in one of the best PRO LEAGUES in the world became a GO-TO DEFENSEMAN and ran with it.
- He had the 2nd best PPG for a draft eligible in that pro league EVER behind Auston Matthews
- He went to the World Championships on a weak team and was their best defenseman prior to an injury.
- He did this without any hype, any portfolio following him, it was all merited by his play.
Well, a lot of people wanted Brule or Kopitar. So it is sort of is cherry picking, because Brule would have been a terrible pick.I was a Price supporter, still think it was the pick to make but I remember at the time people were complaining that Kopitar + Quick was better.
Looking back, they were right. It has nothing to do with cherry-picking since right after the draft that is what some were complaining about.
I was a Price supporter, still think it was the pick to make but I remember at the time people were complaining that Kopitar + Quick was better.
Looking back, they were right. It has nothing to do with cherry-picking since right after the draft that is what some were complaining about.
Looking back is a way to learn and try to not reproduce mistakes. What you know today and what you knew at the time, to find ways to get better. That’s all it is. It’s a normal process. Post Mortem.Looking back is the problem. Hindsight evaluation knowing what you know today creates confusion. It's like saying we should have kept Halak and traded Price because we would have gotten a star center in return for Price.
Price took 6 years to reach his potential, Kopitar 1 year. Price had a team with Koivu, Kovalev and Markov, to name a few. He was partying with Grabovsky and the 2 Kost instead of being serious. Price became good in the after Koivu-Kovalev era. Price had to over-use the butterfly technique to be a top goalie, causing all kind of chronic injuries. Kopitar never had that kind of problem. Kopitar is an top class center with over 1000 pts career (1141 pts), two Stanley Cups and a proven 2 way center 200 feet like Bergeron. A center any team would dream to have. And Quick in his prime was equal to Price.I was a Price supporter, still think it was the pick to make but I remember at the time people were complaining that Kopitar + Quick was better.
Looking back, they were right. It has nothing to do with cherry-picking since right after the draft that is what some were complaining about.
Question: was Shea Weber the no. 1 D during the Habs 2021 playoff run?None of the top number 1 d lead in ice time without PP time. He described him as a 2nd pair dman when he said 2D.
I’m sure we will. But are we going to have another shot at a truly elite forward? I don’t know.
And we wonder why players would rather sign in LA than MTL.Good to see Habs fans embarrassing themselves again sending threats and hate messages to an 18 year old...
f***ing idiots.
I'll never understand it.
I think they will.I’m sure we will. But are we going to have another shot at a truly elite forward? I don’t know.
As fellow German speakers who liveIdeal path would have been to get that player through the draft but that didn’t happen.
The key now is to be mindful of the contracts signed (Caufield’s one is encouraging) and save enough cap space to sign a star UFA in his prime that wants to join a young contending core that is just missing 1-2 players.
Ex: convince Draisatl to sign here in 2 years (instead of giving that $ to Gally, Duffman, Armia and Anderson).