BenchBrawl
Registered User
- Jul 26, 2010
- 31,133
- 14,104
Okay, you explain it. Why wasn’t he drafted 2nd? He clearly had the 2nd highest ceiling. Explain why he went so low. Explain why he was the SECOND Russian taken in that draft?
Players are evaluated on two criteria. Ceiling and risk. Being able to figure out how likely a player is to realize his potential is the secret sauce of drafting. Lots of factors go into this. Maybe they didn’t like his work ethic or his ego. Maybe they felt he regressed this year… all of that would make him a risky pick.
We don’t have access to the info they do. So I have no idea why they didn’t take him. Personally, I’d have taken the risk - based on what I know. If I knew more, maybe I’d pass.
We will have to wait and see how it shakes out. But I think it’s pretty clear that they passed on the guy with the higher ceiling because they didn’t feel he was worth the risk. RD on the other hand appears to be a safer pick.
And sidenote: YES development matters. Guy Lafleur himself has talked about this. A player needs opportunities to build confidence. Confidence yields results. That’s how you devielop as a player. You only have to look at Doug Wickenheiser to see what bad development yields.
I don't know what to respond to this. Why did 4 teams passed on Jagr in 1990? Scared of him not coming over. Scared of PR issues. Tunnel-vision drafting by needs. Who knows.
As for Lafleur, sure, but he too got very little opportunities in the first three years of his career, so how does that differ from Michkov? Lafleur complained non-stop about his icetime and lack of PP opportunities from 72'-74'. Can you imagine Guy Lafleur 72'-74' in Hfboards era, after all the hype he had?