This dude is Phillip Danault's clone, he was made to play for us. What a cutie.
Only after we win the cup though not before FFS.Well, if he's Desjardins, just trade him for Recchi and throw in LeClair just for the lolz.
Seems like a guarantee top four. But I mean Brisebois was too so not sure about this one
If he develops into a 25 minutes all-around solid minute-munching D I don't think anyone will be complaining.
He fought Jonathan once that I remember, but it was the regular season. I think it was the year after Jonathan wrecked Pierre Bouchard and left him a bloody mess, but I’m not a hundred percent on that one. It wasn’t much, Big Bird stretched him out and was able to use his reach to land a few before Jonathan went for his infamous leg tackle to end it (when he was losing). He was a tough little prick Jonathan, and certainly never picked his spots, he fought a lot of tough guys.Robinson also turned a Bruins series around when some one ended up pissing him off maybe Stan Jonathan.
I agree. I would’ve picked Michkov myself. I just understand the pick without being thrilled with it.He fills a huge need no question we need a 1 RHD since pk and Weber are no longer here. The only part that stings is we clearly drafted based on need rather than on BPA and potential. We will have other kicks at the can next year and the year following though. Hopefully the coming years aren’t influenced by needs or size and exclusively best player available. Same story different year unfortunately.
If he develops into a 25 minutes all-around solid minute-munching D I don't think anyone will be complaining.
That's the definition of a damn stud!Thats not enough.... he needs to be a stud
I think more he needs to not have Michkov become a superstar lolThats not enough.... he needs to be a stud
Well yeah, that sounds like a #1 dman.
They said weeks ago they didn't watch him play for a whole season, I really don't think it's that complicated.I saw you were very upset but I'm happy you can come with a very lucid explanation of the situation. That is a very clever post and I thank you for not being overlly emotional after such a deceptional draft (for you).
So yes, it's very possible Molson was emotionally marked by the Mailloux experience and he's maybe obsessed by the marketting of his nhl product. The management was maybe forced to take no risks at all and that explains that pick.
They edited Price's introduction lol
Is it really possible neither FLyers nor Caps offered any asset to trade up and switch with us?We need scoring f*** me
This pick boils down to whether you prefer Hedman or Kucherov if you had to choose, assuming both have the chance to get there.
Or maybe they are not that good in communication. Hughes is more celebral. Bergevin would have done a better persuasive job. At least I can say that was one of his strenght, and to a point where he was arrogant. But I see what you mean.Let's say they really, deeply believed Reinbacher was the best player available. They would respond aggressively in their conviction to the questions being asked. Is that what's happening now? What's happening, when you check the Twitter, is it looks like a Soviet propaganda journal. Like behind every tweet there's an elephant in the room that is not being spoken. This energy transpires through the screen.
You didn't want to risk the PR? Go ahead and admit it. Don't gaslight us.
You really believed Reinbacher was the best player? Be persuasive. Make us feel it in our bones when you speak. This is not happening now.
I don't see Hedman when I watch him play though...This pick boils down to whether you prefer Hedman or Kucherov if you had to choose, assuming both have the chance to get there.
Or maybe they are not that good in communication. Hughes is more celebral. Bergevin would have done a better persuasive job. At least I can say that was one of his strenght, and to a point where he was arrogant. But I see what you mean.