montreal
Go Habs Go
- Mar 21, 2002
- 59,698
- 46,859
In the end, he's a big question mark either way, type of questions marks that should not have made him a top 5. But like Rockstrom said....big, agile RIGHT d-man, tough to acquire....you then pick him......He was never picked on talent. He was picked on what THEY see a rarity.
Strangely enough....this year...right d-men isn't rare anymore....we picked one d-man last year. And we don't need to pick another. Yakemchuck, Levshunov, Parekh....based on their last year analysis, those guys should be our target....and they won't. That will always be my problem with needs.
If the kid is indeed overrated defensively....we are not even talking about a top 2 here. Chances are with a top 5 pick, we got a fine No4....a rare one. But still 4.
Personnally, I think he still can be a No2. With a maximum of 40 points. A Montour, Andersson or a Sanheim. That's my evaluatoin. Right now. I reserve the right to change it...lolll
I don't think he's a big question mark, I'd say the opposite as his size, skating, mobility we know he's going to play in the NHL just a question of how good. There's no way anyone can really know as trying to predict how much a prospect will progress or not is not easy.
I haven't checked but it looks like scoring in the NHL is up over say 10 years ago. If that keep up and he keeps progressing then who knows what he can be or how many points he can put up.
To me I try not to focus too much on what they could be in 5 years and instead just try and see how they are improving on their weaknesses or not and compare it to previous seasons if possible.