DesertPenguin
Registered User
- Apr 22, 2015
- 3,450
- 1,962
If you can find a taker for Jarry at 50%, even if you need to attach a non first round pick to do it, it's better for the team than a buyout.
No one is taking Jarry at 50% without sending back an equally egregious capdump in return.If you can find a taker for Jarry at 50%, even if you need to attach a non first round pick to do it, it's better for the team than a buyout.
2027 1st
Jarry( full cap hit)
For
Husso
Holl
Rather just buy Jarry out and ride the cheap salaries of Murashov/Blom.2027 1st
Jarry( full cap hit)
For
Husso
Holl
The right answer is bury him. It's the same 3 years (costing roughly the same) and it is over with, not another 3 years of losing space no matter how small it is.Rather just buy Jarry out and ride the cheap salaries of Murashov/Blom.
The right answer here is buy Jarry out. There's no reason he should even be taking up a spot in Wilkes Barre. Just move on from this loser.
We're not going to be good in the next 3 years anyway and the 3 years after that it's an 800k cap hit.
Then maybe a straight swap of contracts like Jarry and Goodrow where the Pens retain some to make it appealing for the Sharks to take on an extra year?Again, we have zero need or reason to waste assets moving him and his contract. Its not happening.
Then maybe a straight swap of contracts like Jarry and Goodrow where the Pens retain some to make it appealing for the Sharks to take on an extra year?