Prospect Info: David Reinbacher

Status
Not open for further replies.

vokiel

#DanzeMolsonMix
Jan 31, 2007
18,666
4,239
Montréal
For now he does very much want to play for them...just not for their farm in Cleveland...which is where the Bluejackets want him to play. That is the problem. Apparently he was told to get a place because he's gonna stick in the NHL. As it turned out he sucked at NHL level and had to go down. The player, however, thinks he played well and is demanding PP time instead...because fellow draftees are getting it as well.

Complicated situation. There was worry that he wouldn't report to Cleveland at all. And now, Jiricek is clearly pissed because Blankenburg was promoted instantly after missing time due to injury while he himself is still in the AHL. I think it was just bad and unfortunate communication by the Bluejackets. Shouldn't have gotten his hopes up, probably shouldn't have brought him up at all.
Yeah I'm not really arguing reality. We're just entertaining possibilities, where we can get another solid D prospect and someone is asking for Reinburger. ;)
 

tazsub3

Registered User
May 30, 2016
5,848
6,374
While reading this , I can’t get out of my mind all the messages of how much McDonough was a bust and was disappointing

No really. Reinbacher have better rookie year in euro league than Jiricek. Reinbacher will surprise a lot of people, he is going to shine in smaller ice. I believe in Habs scouts, they wanted him, they all say that he is very very good at offensive zone aswell.
Not only habs scouts . Most scouts from what we heard and read
 

montreal

Go Habs Go
Mar 21, 2002
58,856
44,519
www.youtube.com
not the best game from him from the previous game, I should get around to watching today's game some time later this week. At least he's been getting sort of consistent PP time lately.
 

montreal

Go Habs Go
Mar 21, 2002
58,856
44,519
www.youtube.com
Thank you for taking the time to post these highlighted shifts, do you post all of his shifts on a different site?

do you mean shift by shift vids? I don't usually do those, I figure there's no point if you can't see the player the on the ice, why show it since unlike being there if you can't see the prospect then I feel it's a waste of time. Or if they are just standing around at say the point waiting for the puck but it never comes to them. Sometimes I am super busy so I fast forward a lot but after doing well over 1000 vids you get a feel for when you can do that or not. I would be surprised if I missed much of him doing anything other then standing around.
 

admiralcadillac

Registered User
Oct 22, 2017
7,668
6,977
do you mean shift by shift vids? I don't usually do those, I figure there's no point if you can't see the player the on the ice, why show it since unlike being there if you can't see the prospect then I feel it's a waste of time. Or if they are just standing around at say the point waiting for the puck but it never comes to them. Sometimes I am super busy so I fast forward a lot but after doing well over 1000 vids you get a feel for when you can do that or not. I would be surprised if I missed much of him doing anything other then standing around.
Thanks for the posts! Really informative. He looks pretty good.
 
  • Like
Reactions: montreal

Estimated_Prophet

Registered User
Mar 28, 2003
11,122
12,298
do you mean shift by shift vids? I don't usually do those, I figure there's no point if you can't see the player the on the ice, why show it since unlike being there if you can't see the prospect then I feel it's a waste of time. Or if they are just standing around at say the point waiting for the puck but it never comes to them. Sometimes I am super busy so I fast forward a lot but after doing well over 1000 vids you get a feel for when you can do that or not. I would be surprised if I missed much of him doing anything other then standing around.

Yeah, the shift by shift videos is what I am after. I may need to start paying for them and I know they aren't cheap. There is alot that can be gleaned from watching where players position them selves even when they do not appear to be part of the play.

Once again, I appreciate your efforts and am in no way complaining.....just curious that less than half of his ice time is being shared. He will be playing pro soon enough so in Lane's case it doesn't matter much at this point.

I have noticed him starting to incorporate more back skating recently and was just interested in what I may be missing.
 

RationalExpectations

Registered User
May 12, 2019
5,219
4,046
To me you're hoping that Reinbacher in his D+2 does what Jiricek did in his D+1. Jiricek is bigger and has more tools in my opinion.
Reinbacher is a blend between Nemec and Jiricek. Does not mean he ll be better than both but to me he is more cerebral than Jiricek, less than Nemec but more physical than him and let s face it he does not have Jiricek physicality or shot.
For me it is a question of taste, I likely would not trade Reinbacher for Jiricek, but would for Nemec.
 

montreal

Go Habs Go
Mar 21, 2002
58,856
44,519
www.youtube.com
that less than half of his ice time is being shared.

here's the last few vids listed by date of the game I have with the TOI and what his TOI was,

1-30-24 - vid - 10:57 TOI - 18:33
1-27-24 - vid - 11:01 TOI - 17:37
1-26-24 - vid - 13:00 TOI - 19:34
1-20-24 - vid - 11:34 TOI - 17:34
1-13-24 - vid - 12:32 TOI - 18:11
1-12-24 - vid - 10:05 TOI - 17:12
1-07-24 - vid - 15:56 TOI - 23:07
1-05-24 - vid - 12:40 TOI - 20:13


I can go on but there's a lot of them, close to 40. I did see a couple that were but out of nearly 40 vids. I think if fans tried to edit out everything like I do they would see that I don't really miss much. Sure you can learn things from him standing there but there's a lot of times he's not even being shown.

Now if you were talking Lane Hutson vids that's different cause if I did shift by shift they would be 30 minute vids since as of the broadcasters in his last game they said he leads the NCAA in TOI though they info is made public to verify but his coach did say that he's aware he needs to cut back on his TOI as it was rumored he played over 36 minutes in the 1st or 2nd game of the season.

The #1 complaint I get in the comments on my vids is the length (I blame stupid tick tock for the very short attention spans). Before you brought it up I never once had one person suggest my vids should be longer.

Youtube provides all kinds of analytics for your channel and when I look at, Average view duration in any vid longer then say 3 or 4 mins it's usually well under 50% so that means on average my vids which have been watched for over 100,000 hours, they watch less then half of the actual vid.
 

Estimated_Prophet

Registered User
Mar 28, 2003
11,122
12,298
here's the last few vids listed by date of the game I have with the TOI and what his TOI was,

1-30-24 - vid - 10:57 TOI - 18:33
1-27-24 - vid - 11:01 TOI - 17:37
1-26-24 - vid - 13:00 TOI - 19:34
1-20-24 - vid - 11:34 TOI - 17:34
1-13-24 - vid - 12:32 TOI - 18:11
1-12-24 - vid - 10:05 TOI - 17:12
1-07-24 - vid - 15:56 TOI - 23:07
1-05-24 - vid - 12:40 TOI - 20:13


I can go on but there's a lot of them, close to 40. I did see a couple that were but out of nearly 40 vids. I think if fans tried to edit out everything like I do they would see that I don't really miss much. Sure you can learn things from him standing there but there's a lot of times he's not even being shown.

Now if you were talking Lane Hutson vids that's different cause if I did shift by shift they would be 30 minute vids since as of the broadcasters in his last game they said he leads the NCAA in TOI though they info is made public to verify but his coach did say that he's aware he needs to cut back on his TOI as it was rumored he played over 36 minutes in the 1st or 2nd game of the season.

The #1 complaint I get in the comments on my vids is the length (I blame stupid tick tock for the very short attention spans). Before you brought it up I never once had one person suggest my vids should be longer.

Youtube provides all kinds of analytics for your channel and when I look at, Average view duration in any vid longer then say 3 or 4 mins it's usually well under 50% so that means on average my vids which have been watched for over 100,000 hours, they watch less then half of the actual vid.

Thank you again, and yes I agree that Tik Tok and almost all social media platforms are turning society into a cess pool of mindless sheep bleating out slogans while recoiling at context and abstract thought.

It is best to ignore the requests of these idiots as the fringe is often the loudest and I am sure that the majority of loyal viewers appreciate you doing your best to keep all of the relevant material available.
 

Tyson

Registered User
Mar 1, 2007
49,836
72,218
Texas
here's the last few vids listed by date of the game I have with the TOI and what his TOI was,

1-30-24 - vid - 10:57 TOI - 18:33
1-27-24 - vid - 11:01 TOI - 17:37
1-26-24 - vid - 13:00 TOI - 19:34
1-20-24 - vid - 11:34 TOI - 17:34
1-13-24 - vid - 12:32 TOI - 18:11
1-12-24 - vid - 10:05 TOI - 17:12
1-07-24 - vid - 15:56 TOI - 23:07
1-05-24 - vid - 12:40 TOI - 20:13


I can go on but there's a lot of them, close to 40. I did see a couple that were but out of nearly 40 vids. I think if fans tried to edit out everything like I do they would see that I don't really miss much. Sure you can learn things from him standing there but there's a lot of times he's not even being shown.

Now if you were talking Lane Hutson vids that's different cause if I did shift by shift they would be 30 minute vids since as of the broadcasters in his last game they said he leads the NCAA in TOI though they info is made public to verify but his coach did say that he's aware he needs to cut back on his TOI as it was rumored he played over 36 minutes in the 1st or 2nd game of the season.

The #1 complaint I get in the comments on my vids is the length (I blame stupid tick tock for the very short attention spans). Before you brought it up I never once had one person suggest my vids should be longer.

Youtube provides all kinds of analytics for your channel and when I look at, Average view duration in any vid longer then say 3 or 4 mins it's usually well under 50% so that means on average my vids which have been watched for over 100,000 hours, they watch less then half of the actual vid.
Much appreciated, I watch and like every video you post on YouTube!
 

Habs

It's going to be a long year
Feb 28, 2002
22,752
17,502
So what type of a player do you peeps following him compare the kid to?
 

montreal

Go Habs Go
Mar 21, 2002
58,856
44,519
www.youtube.com
So what type of a player do you peeps following him compare the kid to?

Maybe Dobson but it's been some time since i've seen him. Truth is it's very hard to get a good read on what he is. He's got NHL size, reach, mobility, skating, his gap control is good, he's aggressive in defending and moves the puck well. But he still doesn't use his size well, not very physical but not a cream puff either. He's clearly got some offensive skill as he can move the puck but he's no Andrei Markov of course. He's got what looks like a decent shot but he just does not use it enough at all.

His defensive game seems overrated to me, way too many mistakes and some really dumb ones. He's not terrible in his own like say Norlinder or Trudeau but the turnovers have been the biggest surprise/disappointment to me.
 

KevSkillz4

Registered User
Apr 11, 2016
8,092
13,633
Maybe Dobson but it's been some time since i've seen him. Truth is it's very hard to get a good read on what he is. He's got NHL size, reach, mobility, skating, his gap control is good, he's aggressive in defending and moves the puck well. But he still doesn't use his size well, not very physical but not a cream puff either. He's clearly got some offensive skill as he can move the puck but he's no Andrei Markov of course. He's got what looks like a decent shot but he just does not use it enough at all.

His defensive game seems overrated to me, way too many mistakes and some really dumb ones. He's not terrible in his own like say Norlinder or Trudeau but the turnovers have been the biggest surprise/disappointment to me.

I think he is very young to play in good league like that. So it's normal thing for his mistakes, but the tools at defensive zone are obviously there. If he develop well all his tools, I think Heiskanen is a good comparison aswell.

His potential is very very high, I really liked what I've see in pre-season games with MTL.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HankyZetts

Habs

It's going to be a long year
Feb 28, 2002
22,752
17,502
Maybe Dobson but it's been some time since i've seen him. Truth is it's very hard to get a good read on what he is. He's got NHL size, reach, mobility, skating, his gap control is good, he's aggressive in defending and moves the puck well. But he still doesn't use his size well, not very physical but not a cream puff either. He's clearly got some offensive skill as he can move the puck but he's no Andrei Markov of course. He's got what looks like a decent shot but he just does not use it enough at all.

His defensive game seems overrated to me, way too many mistakes and some really dumb ones. He's not terrible in his own like say Norlinder or Trudeau but the turnovers have been the biggest surprise/disappointment to me.

so .. another 3-4 dman in the pipeline? God I hope he's more than that
 

HuGort

Registered User
Jun 15, 2012
21,607
10,625
Nova Scotia
I think he is very young to play in good league like that. So it's normal thing for his mistakes, but the tools at defensive zone are obviously there. If he develop well all his tools, I think Heiskanen is a good comparison aswell.

His potential is very very high, I really liked what I've see in pre-season games with MTL.
If he's Heiskanen I be very happy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tyson

Benstheman

Registered User
Nov 20, 2014
7,285
3,520
He looks amazing out there at times. He's the kind of rangy, smart, smooth skating defenceman that makes a true #1. There's no question why teams valued him so highly and why he's gonna be really good in his prime. The points will come, he's gonna be a stud.
I'm pretty sure he will become the kind of D that plays 25 minutes with first PK unit and 2nd PP unit.

Our go to guy in late strech of games when we lead by 1 or 2, with Guhle on his left side.

Perfect to partner with with Hutson at 5 vs 5.

If he can manage to get his offensive production to 50-55 pts a year. He will be a really solid 1st pair D for many years.

That being said, i see him peaking at 24 yo, maybe 25 yo. We will need to be patient with him.

1 complete year in the AHL will do wonders for him next season.

He will come in to take Savard's spot at age 21.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Ad

Ad