Amazing Kreiderman
Registered User
- Apr 11, 2011
- 45,071
- 40,921
I'd love to just hear Quinn explain what he thinks of Gauthier. His relationship with him and usage of him are really, really confusing.
Yeah, reminds me of Lias in a way.
I'd love to just hear Quinn explain what he thinks of Gauthier. His relationship with him and usage of him are really, really confusing.
I dont think Giannone has much pull.Next game would be #20, correct?
If they lose and JG does nothing about it at this point in the season then it's no longer about Quinn IMO
What is his relationship with him?
Rangers had hands down their best game of the season on Friday. They followed that up a scant 36 hours later with one of their worst. That's on the coaching.
Yet the Rangers - who are missing a number of regular players - were able to embarrass the SAME EXACT TEAM not 36 hours before. There were no line up changes. I didn't say I expected them to win, but the effort difference between Friday and Sunday is alarming.Maybe you should Boston some credit. They responded to several rotten games by getting better and playing a more complete game. The Rangers--who are missing a number of regular players--were not able to keep up. That's not all on Quinn.
I’d put the Boston game on Sunday aside for a minute and judge the overall nature of this season. If we are being honest, this season has been a nightmare for the Rangers. Multiple players leaving the lineup for many different reasons( injuries, personal issue, conduct issues) has really created an unstable environment( which is exactly the opposite of what you want young kids to develop in.) Let’s also highlight the complete inconsistent display each and every game and I think the key take away from this point in the season is, Quinn provides 0 consistency to the team, he provides next to nothing in terms of in games X’s and O’s, has failed to develop a single talent that’s come up under him( Fox and Miller did not develop under Quinn) is leading this team in the complete wrong direction, provides almost no clear playing style, has given this organization no identity except maybe being soft and easy to play against, has struggled to get the best from players( Mica last year stands out in opposition to this point) seems content to allow his bottom 6 to be complexly year comprised of outside the organization fringe NHL’s and overall just seems to be out coached each and every game.
I’m at a complete loss as to what the organization sees in the guy. I’m at a complete loss as to why he deserves to keep his job. I’m at a complete loss as to what the organization thinks will get better with him behind the bench. I’m at a complete loss as to how making a coaching change is not in order when other m, far superior coaches are available or will possibly soon be available. I’m not saying the time is now— I’d wait until probably the end of this season to see all the options for coaches that might be out there but, I’ll say this— If David Quinn is behind the Rangers bench next season this rebuild will turn into a perpetual .500 or below, 5 plus year nightmare.
Well, he can start by giving other players opportunities to step up.No "adjustment" from Quinn is going to mask his #1 center going from a guy that scored 41 goals in 57 games last season to an AHL player this season. Nevermind that it's asking a lot for a rookie coach and the youngest team in the league to seamlessly integrate NHL-level adjustments as the going gets tough.
No "adjustment" from Quinn is going to mask his #1 center going from a guy that scored 41 goals in 57 games last season to an AHL player this season. Nevermind that it's asking a lot for a rookie coach and the youngest team in the league to seamlessly integrate NHL-level adjustments as the going gets tough.
If he can’t seamlessly integrate NHL-level adjustments then he doesn’t belong coaching in the NHL.No "adjustment" from Quinn is going to mask his #1 center going from a guy that scored 41 goals in 57 games last season to an AHL player this season. Nevermind that it's asking a lot for a rookie coach and the youngest team in the league to seamlessly integrate NHL-level adjustments as the going gets tough.
Sutter couldve been another candidate. Off the board.
He has won multiple Stanley CupsI don’t think Sutter is the coach this team needs right now
Yet the Rangers - who are missing a number of regular players - were able to embarrass the SAME EXACT TEAM not 36 hours before. There were no line up changes. I didn't say I expected them to win, but the effort difference between Friday and Sunday is alarming.
It’s not the results on the scoreboard but the change in effort between the two games that was bad in that situation. Everyone in the world knew Boston was gonna win that game. Doesn’t mean the Rangers had to just roll over and give it to them.Boston was doing a back to back and their 3rd in 4 nights as well. It probably speaks more to their energy level when they faced us in the first game and guys like Bergeron and Marchand are older players. That day off and very humbling defeats to both the Isles and the Rangers--they were looking for revenge.
It’s not the results on the scoreboard but the change in effort between the two games that was bad in that situation. Everyone in the world knew Boston was gonna win that game. Doesn’t mean the Rangers had to just roll over and give it to them.
Still doesn't explain away a lack of caring and effort. Again, everyone knew they were winning that game, doesn't mean the Rangers had to roll out the red carpet for them. That wasn't a game that you could look at and say "Hey at least they tried their best," rather you walk away from that game saying "do they even care?"Coyle made a great play for the first goal. Then Ritchie fell on top of Georgiev--forcing Shesterkin in the game while they were checking out Alex for a concussion. They then made a play to the net that deflected in off of Frederic. Boston knows how to play with a lead and being up 2-0 after 1 period they could tighten up their D and wait for more mistakes. That the Rangers were ineffectual against a very good team in mounting a comeback isn't really a surprise to me. It's important for us to not be chasing games. We have a very young team and we really don't have a lot of success in mounting comebacks.
Coyle made a great play for the first goal. Then Ritchie fell on top of Georgiev--forcing Shesterkin in the game while they were checking out Alex for a concussion. They then made a play to the net that deflected in off of Frederic. Boston knows how to play with a lead and being up 2-0 after 1 period they could tighten up their D and wait for more mistakes. That the Rangers were ineffectual against a very good team in mounting a comeback isn't really a surprise to me. It's important for us to not be chasing games. We have a very young team and we really don't have a lot of success in mounting comebacks.
I'd imagine he's trying to coach him a lot.Micheletti mentioned that they're always talking during practice