Player Discussion David Krejci VI

Status
Not open for further replies.

Mick Riddleton

May these gates never be closed
Apr 24, 2017
14,472
15,797
I would not sign him next year, time to get someone who can play in the next core.

He has fallen off the map 5 on 5,

Jason Spezza a 4th line scrub has 9 goals this year and has a better 5 on 5 stat line.

Spezza 21 pts and 5 on the PP = 16pts 5 on 5
Krech 23 pts and 12 PP pts = 11pts 5 on 5
 

rocketdan9

Registered User
Feb 5, 2009
20,415
13,210
I would not sign him next year, time to get someone who can play in the next core.

He has fallen off the map 5 on 5,

Jason Spezza a 4th line scrub has 9 goals this year and has a better 5 on 5 stat line.

Spezza 21 pts and 5 on the PP = 16pts 5 on 5
Krech 23 pts and 12 PP pts = 11pts 5 on 5

He has had a fine career as a Bruin. But I agree with you ... for next season
 

Mick Riddleton

May these gates never be closed
Apr 24, 2017
14,472
15,797
He has had a fine career as a Bruins. But I agree with you ... for next season
I agree he was a great player but as in Krug and Chara's case I see this team moving on from the older core a piece at a time. Problem is ppl get too sentimental and look to the past and ignore the present. Sucks for him and them but it is a business.
 

BadBruins

Registered User
Aug 10, 2005
9,989
1,745
PEI
I agree he was a great player but as in Krug and Chara's case I see this team moving on from the older core a piece at a time. Problem is ppl get too sentimental and look to the past and ignore the present. Sucks for him and them but it is a business.

I agree in the sense that he's not what he once was. I'd be curious to know where he values himself. If he doesn't let pride and money get in the way.... I'd welcome him back in a heartbeat. The grass isn't always greener on the other side. I would not blame him for going somewhere that promises top-6 minutes and PP time (and money that aligns with that role). He's not that player anymore IMO.

Chara transitioned into more of a specialized player and took a pay cut. Would Krejci accept that? He's still really good at what he does, but his cap hit should be about half of what it is now IMO. Currently the highest on the team, but really somewhere between Smith and Coyle in terms of his actual on ice value (middle-six).

If he wants to return... I wouldn't be so quick to toss him aside. That's where they should have a leg up as a long time "contender". Doesn't seem to be a thing anymore, unfortunately.
 

The National

Registered User
Feb 27, 2017
29,112
31,731
Los Angeles
If he returns at a pay cut for minimal years and we actually get a goal scoring winger, I wouldn’t be upset.

Coyle’s looking like a 4c never mind 2c. If we replace him with a UFA there’s some decent ones on the market but it’s gonna cost a lot more.
 

KrejciMVP

Registered User
Jun 30, 2011
28,809
10,578
Tampa, Florida
I agree he was a great player but as in Krug and Chara's case I see this team moving on from the older core a piece at a time. Problem is ppl get too sentimental and look to the past and ignore the present. Sucks for him and them but it is a business.

moving on as they get zero assets for any of them.
 

Over the volcano

Registered User
Mar 10, 2006
35,253
20,768
Watertown
I agree he was a great player but as in Krug and Chara's case I see this team moving on from the older core a piece at a time. Problem is ppl get too sentimental and look to the past and ignore the present. Sucks for him and them but it is a business.
If they were flush with high end center prospects like the were with defensemen this year you might be on to something. As it is though, he signs a two year deal and they will be lucky to have him
 

SPLBRUIN

Registered User
Mar 21, 2010
12,332
12,505
If they were flush with high end center prospects like the were with defensemen this year you might be on to something. As it is though, he signs a two year deal and they will be lucky to have him

If the Bruins handle things correctly they will have a lot of cap space in the off-season. With this added flexibility it is the perfect time to move on from a aging rapidly declining Krejci. It shouldn't be hard for Sweeney to find a younger, better replacement with plenty of teams up against the cap.
 

Over the volcano

Registered User
Mar 10, 2006
35,253
20,768
Watertown
If the Bruins handle things correctly they will have a lot of cap space in the off-season. With this added flexibility it is the perfect time to move on from a aging rapidly declining Krejci. It shouldn't be hard for Sweeney to find a younger, better replacement with plenty of teams up against the cap.
Ha yeah sure thing - there’s sure to be a glut of 1b centers available
 

KrejciMVP

Registered User
Jun 30, 2011
28,809
10,578
Tampa, Florida
If the Bruins handle things correctly they will have a lot of cap space in the off-season. With this added flexibility it is the perfect time to move on from a aging rapidly declining Krejci. It shouldn't be hard for Sweeney to find a younger, better replacement with plenty of teams up against the cap.

shouldn't be hard lol lets get rid of another producing forward and go with 1 top line and Sweeneys usual collection of jags, grinders and whatever AHL talent he throws on the ice. this is a joke at this point
 

13Hockey

Go Bruins
Jul 20, 2006
25,011
20,785
Boston
If the Bruins handle things correctly they will have a lot of cap space in the off-season. With this added flexibility it is the perfect time to move on from a aging rapidly declining Krejci. It shouldn't be hard for Sweeney to find a younger, better replacement with plenty of teams up against the cap.
EE49F8AB-57E0-4173-B6C2-4E9959364212.jpeg


Yup should be easy here our the top 15 UFA centers by points per game
 

the negotiator

Registered User
Sponsor
Nov 2, 2012
1,438
2,925
Bruins wont sign Krejci so might as well get assets but I predict theyll lose Krejci for nothing bc thats their strategy of incompetence.

It's the never ending story of straddling the fence

not good enough to make a costly Savard put us over the top type acquisition

not bad enough to burn it down

Which means we keep him for this year and " hope" to resign him for another two years
 

KrejciMVP

Registered User
Jun 30, 2011
28,809
10,578
Tampa, Florida
It's the never ending story of straddling the fence

not good enough to make a costly Savard put us over the top type acquisition

not bad enough to burn it down

Which means we keep him for this year and " hope" to resign him for another two years

the market for what Krejci has left in the tank will be too high for Jacobs in free agency. with an old Bergeron and nothing else the Bruins will have to trend towards finding their next center in the lottery. id hope Sweeeny and Neely are gone by then and the Bruins get a fresh set of eyes on things
 

BigGoalBrad

Registered User
Jun 3, 2012
10,738
3,416
Bruins wont sign Krejci so might as well get assets but I predict theyll lose Krejci for nothing bc thats their strategy of incompetence.
Lose for nothing is better than trade before the last playoff run.

The list of UFA centers is brutal hes the best one. RNH will get a deal we don't want to near since the other options are awful.

We aren't a bad team and have a chance in the playoffs despite what the 'fans' say.

Impossible to predict if we can get a deal done on our terms. If I am desperate for a center I'd offer him 3-4 years at his current money.
 

KrejciMVP

Registered User
Jun 30, 2011
28,809
10,578
Tampa, Florida
Lose for nothing is better than trade before the last playoff run.

The list of UFA centers is brutal hes the best one. RNH will get a deal we don't want to near since the other options are awful.

We aren't a bad team and have a chance in the playoffs despite what the 'fans' say.

Impossible to predict if we can get a deal done on our terms. If I am desperate for a center I'd offer him 3-4 years at his current money.

i stopped at lose for nothing is good. its so Sweeeny so watch the entire core walk for nothing
 

DKH

Worst Poster/Awful Takes
Feb 27, 2002
76,685
57,746
Krejci UFA

DeBrusk Seattle

Boston Globe today Matt Porter

Jake DeBrusk, who would be a candidate for Seattle if he’s not moved, could make sense in a deal for Dunn, or with Anaheim if the Ducks, a regular trading partner for the Bruins, would surrender lefty D Hampus Lindholm.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TCB

BRUINS since 1995

Registered User
May 10, 2010
4,650
1,966
Au pays de la neige
DK. Why would the Bruins move DK now! What would be the return? I think Bruins should go all in this year and DK is a must stay. My concern is how the Bruins have a hard time staying healthy and for some time now. DK is having a good year imo.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BigGoalBrad

BigGoalBrad

Registered User
Jun 3, 2012
10,738
3,416
DK. Why would the Bruins move DK now! What would be the return? I think Bruins should go all in this year and DK is a must stay. My concern is how the Bruins have a hard time staying healthy and for some time now. DK is having a good year imo.

I think these people wanted Krug traded at the deadline last year when we were in line to win the Presidents Trophy so we could get a 3rd rounder vs losing him for nothing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BRUINS since 1995

neelynugs

Registered User
Feb 27, 2002
35,636
10,621
i can see krejci signing a 3 year deal with columbus this summer. a team desperate for
a legit center, he's responsible and gives the jackets a great role model/playmaker for
laine. no clue what krejci thinks he's worth these days, but he'll probably be overpaid.
also a chance to be the "#1 guy" and out from bergeron's shadow, even at 35.
 

Dennis Bonvie

Registered User
Dec 29, 2007
31,375
20,883
Connecticut
Perhaps Mr. Krejci already knows he's going back to the Czech Republic to play easy hockey as a returning hero with pockets full American dollars to count in his spare time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LouJersey
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad