Caser
Moderator
That's not what I was saying, I meant that technically there was an agreement, otherwise there wouldn't be a loan.PR nightmare vs losing the players rights vs just letting him leave. Wow, what a hard choice. You can’t seriously think the Wild management isn’t pissed off after he bailed on his team.
At least judging by the video of him posted last week it sounded that he has made up his mind for the next season, the reasoning may vary of course, but from my observations usually the main reason is the development and since it has been a great year for him in that way I don't think it is surprising he wants to continue that.Mom/gf is a good cook?
Bottom line is that we don't know the kid like he and those close to him know him. If he feels he needs more time, and isn't 100% committed, stay in the KHL till he's ready.
As a Wild fan i prefer he gets over ASAP, but that might not be what's best for him.
Then he can sign a 1 yr deal in the KHL for next year.
If we assume he wants to stay in Russia next year then very likely there are 3 options:Then he likely wouldn't be talking about a "loan" to play in the KHL, he'd have just signed a 1yr extension.
Signing with the Wild doesn't earn him anything different other than the possibility to play in the NHL for more money sooner. The loan possibility only favors anyone if he isn't NHL ready.
1. Signing for one year in the KHL for a very modest money.
2. Signing in the KHL for multiple years for some good money.
3. Signing NHL ELC and getting a loan to the KHL - so modest money yet an additional benefit from burning the first ELC year.
I think it is obvious that the first option is not exactly the most tempting out of those for him and for the Wild the second option is the least desirable, therefore the third option might be the middle ground here.