Pastor Of Muppetz
Registered User
- Oct 1, 2017
- 26,397
- 16,372
Well that's brutal.
Week to week is about as vague as it gets
Well that's brutal.
Well that's brutal.
So you mean every other person watching hockey not you?I'll never understand fans who cheer wildly and get excited when two players drop their mitts and start flailing away with haymakers.
Most fights these days are pointless coming after clean hits where nobody was hurt and it's hard to want to see those fights in the game. Fights with real emotion behind them, like in a heated playoff series, are the only ones I want to see these days.So you mean every other person watching hockey not you?
You dont understand ANYONE?
I mean, there are tons of people who go nuts listening to Taylor Swift, too. It's not that weird or questionable to not understand gigantic amounts of people by the masses.So you mean every other person watching hockey not you?
You dont understand ANYONE?
Problem is, the "code" got in the way of common sense....and here we are! What has our record been since he's been out?bah. completing the Gordy Howe Hatty wasn't worth it.
Quick answer...nobody.I think the Canucks are going to think long and hard about resigning him if he comes back and the team suddenly gets better.
I get people don't want to overpay for a guy having a career year at age 27 but who else is in the system that plays like him?
I think the Canucks are going to think long and hard about resigning him if he comes back and the team suddenly gets better.
I get people don't want to overpay for a guy having a career year at age 27 but who else is in the system that plays like him?
Does not come without significant risk but might be worth it.I think the Canucks are going to think long and hard about resigning him if he comes back and the team suddenly gets better.
I get people don't want to overpay for a guy having a career year at age 27 but who else is in the system that plays like him?
Fair enough but is anyone really going to offer Blueger a big deal anyways?Does not come without significant risk but might be worth it.
The thing is. That Garland Blueger Joshua line was so great because of how low their collective cap hit is. Resigning both Blueger and Joshua to significantly more expensive contracts kind of takes that advantage away.
3X3 going forward is affordable for Joshua but I think some team might offer him more hard to say.If Joshua wants anywhere near three no thank you. Under that I’m totally down.
Does not come without significant risk but might be worth it.
The thing is. That Garland Blueger Joshua line was so great because of how low their collective cap hit is. Resigning both Blueger and Joshua to significantly more expensive contracts kind of takes that advantage away.
This was the reason Joshua was signed. toughness and physicality. turns out he's a lot more than that and it sucks having him on the sidelines. Like it or not, fighting is still part of the game.....a bigger part recently with that Jackass in NY running around starting shit every night. A month ago i said i had no interest in Matthieu Olivier when his name came up as a possible target. I have since changed my mind.Tell me again if you even remember the stupid fight that Joshua was in where he hurt his hand and is now week-to-week.
Unfortunately his absence has left a big hole in the lineup, particularly on the third line and has impacted the other guys up and down the lineup.
Just my opinion. But sometimes 'standing up for your teammates' means you stay in the lineup and help them where they need the help the most.
Yes this has been the prevailing wisdomTell me again if you even remember the stupid fight that Joshua was in where he hurt his hand and is now week-to-week.
Unfortunately his absence has left a big hole in the lineup, particularly on the third line and has impacted the other guys up and down the lineup.
Just my opinion. But sometimes 'standing up for your teammates' means you stay in the lineup and help them where they need the help the most.
Sure but... we were up 2 goals on a bottom feeding Blackhawks team with less than 4 minutes to go and Garland wasn't even hit that hard.Yes this has been the prevailing wisdom
In Abby where guys got hurt getting wrecked by other teams goons right?
Who needs protection for Lekkerimaki
Im sure you'll be happy to see Hughes and Pettersson getting smashed and Zadorov Joshua and Myers just standing there doing nothing so they can stay in the lineup if they hurt their hands
Yes we need more Erikssons Mikhayevs and Suters to just stay in the lineup and help their teammates
hindsight is 20/20Sure but... we were up 2 goals on a bottom feeding Blackhawks team with less than 4 minutes to go and Garland wasn't even hit that hard.
Guy just wanted to fight and broke his hand doing so. If Hughes or Petey etc were the target of the hit and it was dirty then sure go fight the guy. Or if it's early enough in a game to set the tone go for it. If it's at the end of a game you are winning against a bad team and the guy wasn't even hit hard... just fcking shove the guy don't break your hand punching metal.
HF I hate fighting in hockey. No other professional sport has it. Its childish, and for the most part its catering to Americans who don't really care about hockey. So include me in the group that think fighting is ignorant and stupid.So you mean every other person watching hockey not you?
You dont understand ANYONE?
Hindsight only applies if its clear that it wasnt a great decision to make at the time. The entire argument is that we dont need him to fight when there is nothing to be gained by it at the end of a game against a bottom feeder. That is true regardless of reasonable outcome.hindsight is 20/20
i want my team sticking up for each other.
Fighting with helmets and visors and gloves off is kinda weird.
Almost rather see fighting with gloves on.