Toggle sidebar

CXLVII - Is this the 'Final Countdown' in Arizona?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Boris Zubov

Boris Zubov

No relation to Sergei, Joe
May 6, 2016
18,704
25,865
Back on the east coast
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: Fatass, bleedblue94 and Tom ServoMST3K
TheLegend

TheLegend

"Just say it 3 times..."
Aug 30, 2009
38,168
31,306
Buzzing BoH
Boris Zubov said:
The subheading is total click bait & is directly contradicted in the body of the text. Walsh isn't holding up development. Local unions are a different story, however.
Click to expand...

Yeah I thought it was a little click baitey.

AZ is a right to work state and right now the unions don't have the clout here like they might elsewhere. But that's all the reason for them to stir up a stink.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ciao

goalie41

Registered User
Feb 7, 2009
36
17
You also have to look at the strong push from the players union that believes playing at Mullet Arena is a complete joke. I say Utah or Houston Coyotes by June 1st.
 
Tom ServoMST3K

Tom ServoMST3K

In search of a Steinbach Hero
Nov 2, 2010
27,874
18,805
What's your excuse?
I find the idea that anyone with the NHL or with the Coyotes was surprised by walsh's comments ridiculous, and if you were actually surprised, you have been living in a Naive bubble.

IMO The PA's opinions on rhe situation have not changed since day one in Mullett, yet everyone (Including a source in the article Legends shared) was acting surprised about Walsh's statements.

Right now it's all about the land bid process, and if there's another interested party - from that perspective the unions trying to source a second bid is tough to hear from The Coyotes perspective.

I'm assuming an out-bid is very possible, considering they had to ramp down their request from 200 to 100 acres.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bleedblue94
TheLegend

TheLegend

"Just say it 3 times..."
Aug 30, 2009
38,168
31,306
Buzzing BoH
Tom ServoMST3K said:
I find the idea that anyone with the NHL or with the Coyotes was surprised by walsh's comments ridiculous, and if you were actually surprised, you have been living in a Naive bubble.

IMO The PA's opinions on rhe situation have not changed since day one in Mullett, yet everyone (Including a source in the article Legends shared) was acting surprised about Walsh's statements.

Right now it's all about the land bid process, and if there's another interested party - from that perspective the unions trying to source a second bid is tough to hear from The Coyotes perspective.

I'm assuming an out-bid is very possible, considering they had to ramp down their request from 200 to 100 acres.
Click to expand...

According to the article…. the included infrastructure cost estimated put the 200 acre parcel to $230 million. Even without any requirement for remediation that’s pretty hefty.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Stumbledore and Tom ServoMST3K
KevFu

KevFu

Registered User
May 22, 2009
9,391
3,590
Phoenix from Rochester via New Orleans
dj4aces said:
While this is a true statement, there are more moving parts in this situation than anyone -- outside the league's head office and its 32 governors -- could possibly know. It's likely that both of you are correct.
Click to expand...

Oh totally! I'm absolutely not saying "You fools! The Coyotes will NEVER end up in Salt Lake!" I think it's totally possible they do end up in Salt Lake. I'm merely dismissive of a super-secret espionage operation underway to make it happen, because that is really devoid of logic.

I think everyone is in the "There's options and we'll see how it plays out..." mode.


Yukon Joe said:
I just wanted to comment on this one point. Not that long ago, the NHL left a 6 million people market in order to go to a 800k market. Sometimes that's just what happens.

I agree that everything being equal the league would rather be in Phoenix than SLC. But sometimes everything isn't equal.

That being said - am I predicting the Coyotes will move to SLC? Oh HELLS NO! I have no idea. I'm just sitting in the back munching on popcorn...
Click to expand...

#1 - that last part is where I recommend everyone be.

#2 - I spent way too long trying to do math on Hartford before realizing you were talking about the Thrashers. The NHL left the Atlanta market because the owner was selling and no one was crazy enough to accept the lease terms of being ASG's tenant.

If AM was as willing to sell as ASG was, the hockey media wouldn't be making up NHL Black Ops, they'd just be ticking off the league by leaking reports of a sale before the NHL wanted them to.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Stumbledore, GreenHornet, dj4aces and 3 others
bleedblue94

bleedblue94

Registered User
Jun 8, 2004
9,199
9,654
Tom ServoMST3K said:
I find the idea that anyone with the NHL or with the Coyotes was surprised by walsh's comments ridiculous, and if you were actually surprised, you have been living in a Naive bubble.

IMO The PA's opinions on rhe situation have not changed since day one in Mullett, yet everyone (Including a source in the article Legends shared) was acting surprised about Walsh's statements.

Right now it's all about the land bid process, and if there's another interested party - from that perspective the unions trying to source a second bid is tough to hear from The Coyotes perspective.

I'm assuming an out-bid is very possible, considering they had to ramp down their request from 200 to 100 acres.
Click to expand...
To think that bettman and walsh dont have the same goal here is insane, they BOTH want the franchise in an nhl arena. one guy works for the owners and one works for the players. this is good cop bad cop but both have the same end goal. and both will want a team in arz at some point even if the yotes move in the short term. bettman cant publically attack one of his bosses, but he can sit back and watch walsh do it with an internal smile. bettman is a lawyer, he is calculated, he knows walsh is going to advocate for the players and in turn put heat on the ownership publicly (bettman cant do it publicly and is in a no win if he does), so he sits back and lets walsh do that and then behind the scenes the nhl does its work on this as well to put its pressure on the situtaion. it isnt rocket science if you understand how lawyers operate and the structure of these jobs...
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mike Louis, Tom ServoMST3K, Coyotedroppings and 3 others
dj4aces

dj4aces

An Intricate Piece of Infinity
Dec 17, 2007
6,520
1,608
Duluth, GA
KevFu said:
Oh totally! I'm absolutely not saying "You fools! The Coyotes will NEVER end up in Salt Lake!" I think it's totally possible they do end up in Salt Lake. I'm merely dismissive of a super-secret espionage operation underway to make it happen, because that is really devoid of logic.

I think everyone is in the "There's options and we'll see how it plays out..." mode.
Click to expand...

I'm not sure there's an "espionage operation" or anything. What I am sure of is the league trying to cover all its bases. Unlike the Thrashers, this situation isn't a last minute sort of operation. If I had to guess, the league has probably been forming two plans -- one for Arizona, one for Potential Relocation Market -- since the moment the Tempe vote results came in.

So, no... no black ops stuff going on. Just a multi-billion dollar business trying to ensure the long-term survival of an asset.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GreenHornet
Yukon Joe

Yukon Joe

Registered User
Aug 3, 2011
6,780
4,807
YWG -> YXY -> YEG
KevFu said:
Oh totally! I'm absolutely not saying "You fools! The Coyotes will NEVER end up in Salt Lake!" I think it's totally possible they do end up in Salt Lake. I'm merely dismissive of a super-secret espionage operation underway to make it happen, because that is really devoid of logic.

I think everyone is in the "There's options and we'll see how it plays out..." mode.




#1 - that last part is where I recommend everyone be.

#2 - I spent way too long trying to do math on Hartford before realizing you were talking about the Thrashers. The NHL left the Atlanta market because the owner was selling and no one was crazy enough to accept the lease terms of being ASG's tenant.

If AM was as willing to sell as ASG was, the hockey media wouldn't be making up NHL Black Ops, they'd just be ticking off the league by leaking reports of a sale before the NHL wanted them to.
Click to expand...
The situation in Atlanta was of course completely different then the one in Arizona. Atlanta had an ownership group that didn't want to own an NHL team (and didn't want one in their building). I just brought it up to point out that market size isn't everything.

Arizona on the other hand has an ownership group that would very much like to own a team, but doesn't have a building. The question though is how long does the NHL let the situation go before it tries to force a relocation and sale.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dj4aces and GreenHornet
TheGreenTBer

TheGreenTBer

the only language I speak is FAILURE
Apr 30, 2021
9,944
12,174
goalie41 said:
You also have to look at the strong push from the players union that believes playing at Mullet Arena is a complete joke. I say Utah or Houston Coyotes by June 1st.
Click to expand...
Houston is out of the picture until the NHL can convince Tilman Fertitta to overpay for a team.

It's Arizona or SLC and we will know that answer within months IMO.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rob
Rob

Rob

Registered User
Feb 27, 2002
9,163
1,584
New Brunswick
Visit site
Worker Power, a social welfare labor organization, spent more than $480,000 to defeat the Tempe propositions, according to campaign contribution data reviewed by FOS. (About half those funds came from UA Local 469, which represents pipefitters, plumbers, and welders.) And there’s been some spillover to the new project, where local unions are pushing for 100% union labor to construct whatever is built on the open land. The Coyotes countered with a promise to use 25% union labor.
Click to expand...

Yeah, there's going to be a big fight with the local union.
 
TheLegend

TheLegend

"Just say it 3 times..."
Aug 30, 2009
38,168
31,306
Buzzing BoH
Rob said:
Yeah, there's going to be a big fight with the local union.
Click to expand...

Depends.

Arizona is a “right to work” state. Unions don’t have the strength here (yet) that they do in other parts of the US. So they’re left to giving financial backing to things like public referendums (aka TED)

BTW the semiconductor factory referred to in the article is not 100% union.
 
GKJ

GKJ

Global Moderator
Feb 27, 2002
192,252
43,074
I’m not an expert in labor unions, but where the hell they get $480k from?
 
MeHateHe

MeHateHe

Registered User
Dec 24, 2006
2,706
3,109
GKJ said:
I’m not an expert in labor unions, but where the hell they get $480k from?
Click to expand...
Worker Power doesn't seem to be so much of a union as a PAC. They're affiliated with the AFL-CIO but they take in donations, in addition to the money they no doubt get from the federation and the unions they are a part of. It looks to be an offshoot of UNITE HERE - a union which mostly represents workers in the hotel sector.

www.workerpower.com

ABOUT | Worker Power

www.workerpower.com www.workerpower.com

UNITE HERE is a large union in terms of members, although their members tend to not be paid particularly well. I'm not sure if PACs are required to publish their financials, but it wouldn't surprise me if most of their funding comes in from donations.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TheLegend and GKJ
LT

LT

Global Moderator
Jul 23, 2010
42,418
14,120
KevFu said:
Spoken like an owner who's arena just turned 20 years old!
Click to expand...

And it would still be the 9th youngest arena in the league, not counting Mullett.

It would also be the 10th largest by capacity.

It's almost like it's an actual NHL caliber arena.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Stumbledore
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Latest posts

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad

Top Bottom
X