MNNumbers
Registered User
- Nov 17, 2011
- 7,668
- 2,546
I mean, I assumed he would be post Tempe-fiasco.Question: If there are three local interests in buying the team, that must mean there is some interest in Meruelo in selling.
Does that mean he feel pessimistic about his efforts, including his efforts toward this parcel?
Also, if Bettman intends to make an announcement in the next 2 weeks about the situation, it is going to be about a sale to local interests, because there is no way that he would announce a relocation this early.
The state land parcel in question...from what I heard...had not even been appraised...which would have been a necessary step before making it on the agenda...Question: If there are three local interests in buying the team, that must mean there is some interest in Meruelo in selling.
Does that mean he feels pessimistic about his efforts, including his efforts toward this parcel?
I’m hopeful the Meurello ownership can get their land and start the new rink soon. There is just the feeling that if they don’t get going soon the league will force a sale and move. Although I guess the nhl is in constant communication with the Coyote owners and all are aware of what needs to be done and by which dates.Ignore the noise coming from the PA.
The rest of this though is important.
Honestly?Why are people buying into the whole local ownership bullshit again? Are you really that naive?
Does the nhl want the club playing in an empty steam though?Honestly?
Sale to local ownership
Relocate to SLC
Trust Land Purchase
That’s my 3 for my batting order, or my believability list
I said it 6 years ago on here. The only way the Coyotes can survive and stay in the Valley is if the Phoenix Suns ownership (then Sarver) would buy them and bring them underneath the roof of Footprint
I can buy into Ishiba being an interested party or part of a group. Barkley? Wouldn’t be shocked either.
It’s either this or Utah man
The 2 week timeline, I’ll believe it when it see it. If they’re moving, same deal.
Ishbia is the favorite because Bettman has shown that any option possible that exists to stay in Arizona he will take. The question will be if the offer is just completely insulting and unacceptable. We heard this week about this being a ‘unique situation’ when it comes to strong arming Merulo out of the league, the same applies both ways when it comes to selling for less than the franchise value should be just to stay in the market.
We’ve heard that if they move, they will return as soon as they can. But if that was so certain we wouldn’t be here. This market has had so much trouble, how soon would you get someone willing to pay an expansion fee?
But if they’re going to move, then I would think sooner than later is better. They do not want this hanging over the end of the season and playoffs. The league went to great lengths to hide moving the Thrashers. Utah needs to get staff hired, but it is news they’re going to want to bury, and with all eyes on the NFL, it’s their best chance
On the other hand if they move the message will be emphasized as the NHL is coming Utah and less so about Arizona losing the team. Perhaps a leak could happen on a Friday followed by a denial until the deal is done.I will say, if you're announcing the team is gonna move, you couldn't pick a better time than this week.
NBA trade deadline and Super Bowl. This Friday is the perfect news dump day.
If they are moving, that’s going to be a point of personal humiliation and embarrassment for him as well, he will want as few eyes as possible on himself as well.I will say, if you're announcing the team is gonna move, you couldn't pick a better time than this week.
NBA trade deadline and Super Bowl. This Friday is the perfect news dump day.
Can Meurello still be the owner if the club moves or will the league force him to sell to a new owner in the new city?If they are moving, that’s going to be a point of personal humiliation and embarrassment for him as well, he will want as few eyes as possible on himself as well.
In theory he still could, but how’s he getting a building?Can Meurello still be the owner if the club moves or will the league force him to sell to a new owner in the new city?
Ultimately it is better for the NHL to find a solution in Arizona than it is to move them. They really need to stay there if we want hockey to have any impact in the desert
Hands will be forced! You can count on that.I think the most likely thing is a fourth option: no sale, no move, no arena and the team remains with present ownership in the current arena until further notice . . . which could be a long time away.
I can't imagine that anyone's hand will be forced at this juncture.
Honestly?
Sale to local ownership
Relocate to SLC
Trust Land Purchase
That’s my 3 for my batting order, or my believability list
I said it 6 years ago on here. The only way the Coyotes can survive and stay in the Valley is if the Phoenix Suns ownership (then Sarver) would buy them and bring them underneath the roof of Footprint
I can buy into Ishiba being an interested party or part of a group. Barkley? Wouldn’t be shocked either.
It’s either this or Utah man