No Fun Shogun
34-38-61-10-13-15
Man... that would be a kick in the teeth to lose the team and not even have a chance to say goodbye like the Thrashers.
Doesn't have to be a massive conspiracy theory that the owner bought the team to land this Tempe deal and he doesn't want to go though with it anymore given we're on the cusp of a global recession that looks to be getting more nasty by each month.Yeah, seriously. Was that laziness or hubris?
The whole thing is bizarre.
I feel like either this is some massive conspiracy from the top down, bottom up (involving the NHL, the various cities, various ownerships, shady outside unions, etc.) or it's just not a great hockey market.
I'm really sorry to say, but as someone who is not a massive conspiracy theorist, my bet is on one of the two things above and I imagine it can be figured out fairly easily.
Arizona has changed a lot recently, but at it's core it basically is one of the birthplaces of the modern anti-tax moment. Any kind of public funding deal for a sports team, especially one that doesn't have as broad of an appeal of the other three of the big four, had to have been an inherent longshot, right?
And I recognize that there was an apparent misinformation campaign, but that's a given for basically any election going forward. Ownership can't push this deal, barely spend money campaigning for it (unless I'm mistaken), and be surprised at striking out.
I feel bad for Yotes fans. They are solid and have had to put up with a lot. But the lesson is that there just aren't enough of them to expect a team-friendly set of referenda to pass in a public vote.
Meruelo might be ok with moving the team there and not selling, the NHL may have already had meetings with KC and Salt Lake City, they have all their bases covered in the event something like this happened, the NHL is not unprepared for these situations as they might seem to people, just like they already had Winnipeg in their back pocket in case Atlanta did not work either.It's not going to be Kansas City, unless very recently a group expressed interest in moving a team there. If it's not Texas, Quebec can put in an offer. There is no way they keep the team in a 4,600 seat arena long term.
Meruelo might be ok with moving the team there and not selling, the NHL may have already had meetings with KC and Salt Lake City, they have all their bases covered in the event something like this happened, the NHL is not unprepared for these situations as they might seem to people, just like they already had Winnipeg in their back pocket in case Atlanta did not work either.
I just said the NHL has a backup plan for moving the team if needed.The Coyotes ownership may not have a Plan "B", but Bettman always has a Plan "B"... you just don't find out what it is until it happens.
I’m wondering if maybe the league just told Bettman that he’s on his own here and if it’s an indication how much support he had, which would be very atypical that not be showing a strong front. Seravalli was also the one saying that the Coyotes were not presenting as a core element of this. It was like, all the stuff in this and oh yeah, the Coyotes are in here too, which makes sense as a strategy if the team and specifically the owner were that unpopular.Yeah, seriously. Was that laziness or hubris?
The whole thing is bizarre.
I feel like either this is some massive conspiracy from the top down, bottom up (involving the NHL, the various cities, various ownerships, shady outside unions, etc.) or it's just not a great hockey market.
I'm really sorry to say, but as someone who is not a massive conspiracy theorist, my bet is on one of the two things above and I imagine it can be figured out fairly easily.
It’ll be a cold day in hell when that happens.The other option of course is the team folds if they can't be moved, which is maybe starting to look like a possibility.
I’d imagine having a prominent role for the Coyotes and their owner in the bid would play right into the “no subsidy for billionaires” crowd.I’m wondering if maybe the league just told Bettman that he’s on his own here and if it’s an indication how much support he had, which would be very atypical that not be showing a strong front. Seravalli was also the one saying that the Coyotes were not presenting as a core element of this. It was like, all the stuff in this and oh yeah, the Coyotes are in here too, which makes sense as a strategy if the team and specifically the owner were that unpopular.
It's not without irony that the least gimmicky plan in a long list of batcrap insanity is going to be the one straw that break the camel back.Sad development for Coyote fans. Mucho respect for putting up with all the relocation talk for almost 15 years. Based on Muerello and NHL statements I don’t see the Yotes sticking around. Houston is my bet.
im almost nostalgic for the Glendale era: $50M from the council to the team, $15M arena management fees, parking garages being bought back by the city. A lot of entertaining history to be sure.
Agreed... they will prop it up with losses before folding. That would hurt franchise values in a major way.It’ll be a cold day in hell when that happens.
It's just reality. Pittsburgh got bailed out multiple times.So sure you are sport…whatever
Doesn't have to be a massive conspiracy theory that the owner bought the team to land this Tempe deal and he doesn't want to go though with it anymore given we're on the cusp of a global recession that looks to be getting more nasty by each month.
This is after the same guy spent just shy of $1B on back-to-back casino and hockey team purchases right before a global pandemic shut down society for 2 years.
It's just business probably, know when to hold and when to fold.
We'll find out what plan b everyone has. If the Coyotes have a good one, they'll get time to explore that. If not, we'll find out if the league has a plan b it can execute right now. If they need a year to figure that out, the Coyotes will stay for another year.
Eventually, the voters are going to ask why such potentially prime real estate is sitting vacant.If they drop 100 million on rehabing the site out of their own reserves to rehabilitate the site, or if they approve a similar project a few years from now, as I've seen a bunch of times with referendums like this.