CXLIX - FINAL thoughts on the Arizona Coyotes

Voight

#winning
Feb 8, 2012
42,018
18,554
Mulberry Street
I mean, yes and no. It's over, the Coyotes are finally dead after being strung around for over a decade. The franchise didn't just relocate it has been technically disbanded, and is the first franchise to go properly defunct in some 50-odd years. This saga will be talked about until the end of time because the way it unfolded was genuinely a fascinating disasterpiece of incompetence. To that end, this is a bait and switch because I don't think the conversation should end about this non-existent team, and the prospect of a new expansion franchise. On the other, Coyotes relocation talk is finally over.

I wouldn't call them properly defunct, it's more of a Cleveland Browns type of thing for now.
 

Boris Zubov

No relation to Sergei, Joe
May 6, 2016
18,904
26,185
Back on the east coast
Matthews, McDavid, or Eichel would've put the team on the map in AZ. With ownership that couldn't afford to pay for them and support pieces, it likely would've still flailed true.

What I am confident of though and folks don't have to agree with me and I don't care but if Bill Foley (or a similar type) had owned the Coyotes, and setup an arena in Phoenix the way he (and others) did in Vegas and if he ran the team in Phoenix the way he did in Vegas. I am confident the Coyotes would've been successful. It was a good enough market that competent ownership would've had success.
So here's a what-if conundrum....What if Foley owned the team & they started in Glendale? Is the team viable & profitable?
 

TheLegend

"Just say it 3 times..."
Aug 30, 2009
38,532
31,673
Buzzing BoH
So here's a what-if conundrum....What if Foley owned the team & they started in Glendale? Is the team viable & profitable?

Rumor was Foley might have looked into Arizona and moved them to Vegas but preferred to build from the ground up.


Glendale doesn’t work unless you own Westgate and the Coyotes. And neither were in great shape at the time. Bob Parsons ended up getting Westgate dirt cheap but wasn’t interested in being a pro franchise owner.
 

Boris Zubov

No relation to Sergei, Joe
May 6, 2016
18,904
26,185
Back on the east coast
Rumor was Foley might have looked into Arizona and moved them to Vegas but preferred to build from the ground up.


Glendale doesn’t work unless you own Westgate and the Coyotes. And neither were in great shape at the time. Bob Parsons ended up getting Westgate dirt cheap but wasn’t interested in being a pro franchise owner.
I was around for the Foley rumor that had him taking the Yotes to Vegas. Always felt bogus & from what I recall it was never attributed to any legit sources.

You're moving the goalposts a little, but If you believe Glendale doesn't work unless Westgate is also owned by the same individual, then hockey returning to the area is not happening anytime soon, if ever, unless Ishbia bids for an expansion franchise & either renovates Footprint yet again or builds a new arena. My point is, if a team cannot stand on their own without an entertainment district, they really have no business being in the market.

Add in the fact that the combined costs for a franchise & a new entertainment district are going to approach $5B by the time this rolls around, the prospects for a new team are pretty bleak, IMO.
 

TheLegend

"Just say it 3 times..."
Aug 30, 2009
38,532
31,673
Buzzing BoH
I was around for the Foley rumor that had him taking the Yotes to Vegas. Always felt bogus & from what I recall it was never attributed to any legit sources.

You're moving the goalposts a little, but If you believe Glendale doesn't work unless Westgate is also owned by the same individual, then hockey returning to the area is not happening anytime soon, if ever, unless Ishbia bids for an expansion franchise & either renovates Footprint yet again or builds a new arena. My point is, if a team cannot stand on their own without an entertainment district, they really have no business being in the market.

Add in the fact that the combined costs for a franchise & a new entertainment district are going to approach $5B by the time this rolls around, the prospects for a new team are pretty bleak, IMO.


Agreed...

But it's not just Glendale.... it's anywhere. It's getting harder and harder for pro sports teams to make it on just an arena alone. Especially in the smaller markets.

Ishiba isn't a guarantee either. He's got full control of Footprint, but spending another $1.2 billion for an NHL franchise isn't going to bring enough return to quantify it. There has been talk about Phoenix creating a large sports entertainment district downtown and Ishiba could be part of it but it's only talk.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sgt Schultz

voyageur

Hockey fanatic
Jul 10, 2011
10,345
9,551
Agreed...

But it's not just Glendale.... it's anywhere. It's getting harder and harder for pro sports teams to make it on just an arena alone. Especially in the smaller markets.

Ishiba isn't a guarantee either. He's got full control of Footprint, but spending another $1.2 billion for an NHL franchise isn't going to bring enough return to quantify it. There has been talk about Phoenix creating a large sports entertainment district downtown and Ishiba could be part of it but it's only talk.
I don't know why people think an expansion franchise is worth $1.2 billion. Just because the league sold an existing franchise for $1.2 billion doesn't mean an expansion team is worth that. Maybe the number is only $800 million, an increase from the last expansion team at $650 million, which was $500 million when Vegas was admitted. That's a number more in line with the bottom of the league valuations. Which is where you start, and the market and success dictates the growth. I can see a realistic possibility of both Atlanta and Arizona awarded franchises in the next couple of years, and Gary Bettman retiring, having only screwed over the markets of Quebec and Hartford, in his tenure, which were unwanted markets when they were accepted to the NHL. Quebec may not have the votes to get in, and Hartford isn't even on the radar anymore.
 

TheLegend

"Just say it 3 times..."
Aug 30, 2009
38,532
31,673
Buzzing BoH
I don't know why people think an expansion franchise is worth $1.2 billion. Just because the league sold an existing franchise for $1.2 billion doesn't mean an expansion team is worth that. Maybe the number is only $800 million, an increase from the last expansion team at $650 million, which was $500 million when Vegas was admitted. That's a number more in line with the bottom of the league valuations. Which is where you start, and the market and success dictates the growth. I can see a realistic possibility of both Atlanta and Arizona awarded franchises in the next couple of years, and Gary Bettman retiring, having only screwed over the markets of Quebec and Hartford, in his tenure, which were unwanted markets when they were accepted to the NHL. Quebec may not have the votes to get in, and Hartford isn't even on the radar anymore.

My reasoning here....

It's $1.2 billion because that's what the NHL wanted for the next expansion.

Utah was originally to be an expansion location. Ryan Smith had first contacted the league nearly two years prior about it and was progressing on a track with Salt Lake City's bid for the Winter Olympics. But when Alex Meruelo ran into all the problems he created they facilitated the sale of teh Coyotes using the expansion price as a base point.

And for all intensive purposes.... Utah was a NEW team. Remember that Meruelo at that point still had control of any Arizona franchise for the next five years, and it was going to cost him at minimum $1 billion to reactivate it.

That....... and you also had Atlanta who was actually ahead of SLC in the process at that point and they needed to keep that expansion price up.

Now that Meruelo is out of the picture anyone could bring a franchise back to Arizona. But it'll start at the $1.2 billion.... possibly more by the time it comes around.
 

Headshot77

Bad Photoshopper
Feb 15, 2015
4,034
2,063
Pittsburgh
I don't know why people think an expansion franchise is worth $1.2 billion. Just because the league sold an existing franchise for $1.2 billion doesn't mean an expansion team is worth that. Maybe the number is only $800 million, an increase from the last expansion team at $650 million, which was $500 million when Vegas was admitted. That's a number more in line with the bottom of the league valuations. Which is where you start, and the market and success dictates the growth. I can see a realistic possibility of both Atlanta and Arizona awarded franchises in the next couple of years, and Gary Bettman retiring, having only screwed over the markets of Quebec and Hartford, in his tenure, which were unwanted markets when they were accepted to the NHL. Quebec may not have the votes to get in, and Hartford isn't even on the radar anymore.
Wait until you see that the next expansion will be $2b per franchise
 

voyageur

Hockey fanatic
Jul 10, 2011
10,345
9,551
My reasoning here....

It's $1.2 billion because that's what the NHL wanted for the next expansion.

Utah was originally to be an expansion location. Ryan Smith had first contacted the league nearly two years prior about it and was progressing on a track with Salt Lake City's bid for the Winter Olympics. But when Alex Meruelo ran into all the problems he created they facilitated the sale of teh Coyotes using the expansion price as a base point.

And for all intensive purposes.... Utah was a NEW team. Remember that Meruelo at that point still had control of any Arizona franchise for the next five years, and it was going to cost him at minimum $1 billion to reactivate it.

That....... and you also had Atlanta who was actually ahead of SLC in the process at that point and they needed to keep that expansion price up.

Now that Meruelo is out of the picture anyone could bring a franchise back to Arizona. But it'll start at the $1.2 billion.... possibly more by the time it comes around.
I don't believe you can consider Utah a new team, in that Smith bought an organization that already had a front office in place, and a prospect pool. Realistically that is something that an expansion franchise has to build, when you look at Seattle, it's taken awhile. Prospects are a means to immediate improvement, which will be a task for any future expansion team. For both Vegas and Seattle they were more attractive markets than a lot of NHL markets so they have had no trouble with getting players to sign there, Vegas using the trade route and free agency, Seattle mostly free agency. Not sure Ariona or Atlanta will have the allure those two markets do, in getting off the ground, so I would remain conservative.

But maybe you are right, using Sportico's numbers every franchise is worth $1 billion, I suspect the Forbes numbers come in lower,
 

TheLegend

"Just say it 3 times..."
Aug 30, 2009
38,532
31,673
Buzzing BoH
I don't believe you can consider Utah a new team, in that Smith bought an organization that already had a front office in place, and a prospect pool. Realistically that is something that an expansion franchise has to build, when you look at Seattle, it's taken awhile. Prospects are a means to immediate improvement, which will be a task for any future expansion team. For both Vegas and Seattle they were more attractive markets than a lot of NHL markets so they have had no trouble with getting players to sign there, Vegas using the trade route and free agency, Seattle mostly free agency. Not sure Ariona or Atlanta will have the allure those two markets do, in getting off the ground, so I would remain conservative.

But maybe you are right, using Sportico's numbers every franchise is worth $1 billion, I suspect the Forbes numbers come in lower,
Smith only got the hockey ops department, coaching staff and player contracts in the deal.

He actually used his people from the Utah Jazz to initiate the move and spent the next 4-5 months hiring a front office for the hockey club. A few came from Arizona but they were all new hires from his perspective.
 

DustyDangler

Registered User
Dec 20, 2023
1,297
2,122
So here's a what-if conundrum....What if Foley owned the team & they started in Glendale? Is the team viable & profitable?
No. Whether it is Ottawa, or the Rays or the Coyotes, I think it is clear the struggle teams face when they do not have an arena centrally located to their fan base. I do not think a smart owner such as Foley would've ever rolled with Glendale. It was a lack of good options kind of move (and an enrichment of a certain someone's real estate agenda) and a better to be in Glendale than Portland kind of thing.

AWA, should've been multi-purpose (20/20 hindsight) and the NHL should not have allowed Winnipeg 1.0 to leave a market with an arena problem to go to another market with an arena problem. The NHL has more recently shown a lot more care regarding expansion and relocation and I doubt we will see the Jets to Phoenix scenario again.

Ultimately, imho, the NHL can work in the desert with the essential ingredients of strong ownership, a centrally located arena, and a competitive on ice product, things the Coyotes never had.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad