what is this in reference?
Nick Woods turned Sky Harbor inside out.... flipped their own data against them.
Still not a defining moment in this saga.
I smell lawsuits incoming.
lol sky harbor is gonna have a hard time convincing a judge to throw it out when they did nothing about the other projects that happened near the airport.
Never underestimate the courts in Arizona.
Sky Harbor has hinted they want to bring bigger planes in (aka the Airbus 380). Which means extending the north runways to handle them. Meruelo's project would put a huge damper to that.
so the judge is gonna ignore the other residental projects that were built near the airport that sky harbor isn't making a peep out at the time and throw out this project?
Nick Woods turned Sky Harbor inside out.... flipped their own data against them.
Sky Harbor has hinted they want to bring bigger planes in (aka the Airbus 380). Which means extending the north runways to handle them. Meruelo's project would put a huge damper to that.
Still not a defining moment in this saga.
I smell lawsuits incoming.
We crossed over into the absurd when Sky Harbor posted their economic impact "analysis" - now they've gone to plaid.
Airbus A380: End of a multibillion-dollar dream – DW – 12/16/2021
The last Airbus A380 has been delivered, bringing the program to an end. Once seen as the future of travel, the world's biggest aircraft turned into a flop. But for the plane-maker, it was still worth the effort.www.dw.com
What got me was Woods pointed out Sky Harbor has been trying to impose contour maps that they came up with that FAA never approved. The last approved one being 1999.
To be fair, you can see how this plays out. Sky Harbor simply wants an accommodation to all this. Woods, unfortunately, showed his hand when he said that they tried to make accommodations and the only thing that wasn't accommodate was a legal issue that they couldn't resolve.
That the two are airing their laundry in front of the Council is pretty immature, IMO, from both sides.
I still think the Bond issue will be a huge problem for Meruelo. Only because Real Estate companies go "bankrupt" and change owners all the time. It's one of the more volatile industries in terms of financial backing. There would have to be so many legal things to keep the backing in place, that would literally tie-up Meruelo's investments, just to make good on the backing for the Bonds. While it looks good on paper, to try and convince someone of your financial "stability", I would think that there would be any number of scenarios where that backing could easily fall through and submarine the whole project. Full marks to the ownership group, though, for at least trying. Just feels like the whole thing rides on Meruelo being able to be trusted at his word. And that doesn't carry much weight, one would think, in Arizona.
Perhaps we should consider that the parties would enter into some form of amended/successor agreement long before judges or courts determine the outcome of this hypothetical?
The bonding part has changed, as has the GPLET part they’re asking for.To be fair, you can see how this plays out. Sky Harbor simply wants an accommodation to all this. Woods, unfortunately, showed his hand when he said that they tried to make accommodations and the only thing that wasn't accommodate was a legal issue that they couldn't resolve.
That the two are airing their laundry in front of the Council is pretty immature, IMO, from both sides.
I still think the Bond issue will be a huge problem for Meruelo. Only because Real Estate companies go "bankrupt" and change owners all the time. It's one of the more volatile industries in terms of financial backing. There would have to be so many legal things to keep the backing in place, that would literally tie-up Meruelo's investments, just to make good on the backing for the Bonds. While it looks good on paper, to try and convince someone of your financial "stability", I would think that there would be any number of scenarios where that backing could easily fall through and submarine the whole project. Full marks to the ownership group, though, for at least trying. Just feels like the whole thing rides on Meruelo being able to be trusted at his word. And that doesn't carry much weight, one would think, in Arizona.
The bonding part has changed, as has the GPLET part they’re asking for.
Meruelo will put more up front but there’s a backend to it and I didn’t get much data on that but would imagine we will if it goes forward because it should be public then.
There were 90 requests for comments. Three minutes each but quite a few haven’t shown up when called.so any idea how soon they'll vote on to continue or not?
Sky Harbor.... making the hard case for having residential units in the project.
Claims it's not about the arena.... but it is.
Craig Morgan wrote in his article that I linked this morning at least two city council members in Phoenix would like to woo the Coyotes there.
See, I have zero problem with PHX and Tempe bickering and fighting over the Coyotes if they're arguing over WHO GETS THEM because both want them.
Fight over who can get a shovel in the ground the fastest and make the Coyotes the best deal.
There were 90 requests for comments. Three minutes each but quite a few haven’t shown up when called.
One problem where in phx they are gonna play at? The NBA suns don't want them.