DuckDuckGetz
Registered User
- Nov 20, 2017
- 2,742
- 4,445
I think Cutter will be more involved at the pro level, but even if he was just a passenger goalscorer, this team would easily have 7-8 more wins with a passenger goalscorer.
I’m not expecting him to be a line driver, nor am I convinced he’ll be a top 6 winger in the NHL.That’s the thing. I think fans are expecting a line driver he is not that. He is a two way physical player who can snipe , which is very needed in the Ducks Top 6.
We already have 4 line drivers in our Top 6. Need guys to shoot.
Last night he impressed. Yeah not all his shifts were perfect but if 17 shot attempts with 9 of them on goal doesn’t impress then I’m a lost of words.
He is also tied in the league with goals scored.
Ehhh Luc Robitaile made a living in front of the net... we need a natural goal scorer.. a sniper.. If he can become that.. than you use him to his strengths..I’m not expecting him to be a line driver, nor am I convinced he’ll be a top 6 winger in the NHL.
The least of my worries is him shooting too much.
I’m more concerned about his lack of hockey IQ, not moving his feet, not finding open spaces on the ice, bad passing, struggling to read the play in all three zones, among other issues.
I love that he has a great shot, but I’m afraid he’s lacking many other attributes that would make him a good hockey player at the NHL level.
Are these concerns shared by anyone else? Some of this stuff (not moving his feet, bad passing) is kind of covered in the "passenger" label. But while I don't think he's been praised for his hockey IQ or his ability to read plays, it also hasn't been called out by anyone else that I've seen. And he's been praised for his defense. And his ability to get to scoring areas.I’m more concerned about his lack of hockey IQ, not moving his feet, not finding open spaces on the ice, bad passing, struggling to read the play in all three zones, among other issues.
I’m not expecting him to be a line driver, nor am I convinced he’ll be a top 6 winger in the NHL.
The least of my worries is him shooting too much.
I’m more concerned about his lack of hockey IQ, not moving his feet, not finding open spaces on the ice, bad passing, struggling to read the play in all three zones, among other issues.
I love that he has a great shot, but I’m afraid he’s lacking many other attributes that would make him a good hockey player at the NHL level.
Sprong was the missing piece after all!I think Cutter will be more involved at the pro level, but even if he was just a passenger goalscorer, this team would easily have 7-8 more wins with a passenger goalscorer.
Doesn’t Johnston have 3 more years left on his deal?Regarding where he fits in the lineup next season, I think he starts out on the wing. Long-term though, it would be nice to have him in the middle if he's up to it. Carlsson and Cutter as a 1-2 gives us nice size at center. I imagine it would be a long process to get him acclimated to playing in the middle in the show though.
For now, I'm guessing next year looks like this:
Zegras - Carlsson - Terry
Cutter - McTavish - Killorn
Vatrano - Lundestrom - Stroke
No idea what the 4th line will look like. Jones, Groulx, and Leason are all RFA's with arbitration rights and Carrick and Johnston are UFA. The only one more likely to return than not is McGinn and that's because we're stuck with his contract for another year (unless he gets bought out, which I doubt).
Also, Lundestrom isn't guaranteed to stick either. If he gets non-tendered, I think Stroke slots in the middle and one of Nesterenko or Perreault fills in the right side.
+1000 for me, I’m very excited!It’s weird, because I see him and I’m very excited about his skill set and what he’ll bring to our offensive core.
This. I have a feeling people saw the trade and expected a top line line driver. That's just not his game, and thats okay.
Here are a few posts I found in his prospect thread:Are these concerns shared by anyone else? Some of this stuff (not moving his feet, bad passing) is kind of covered in the "passenger" label. But while I don't think he's been praised for his hockey IQ or his ability to read plays, it also hasn't been called out by anyone else that I've seen. And he's been praised for his defense. And his ability to get to scoring areas.
I haven't watched full games of his, so I can't opine knowledgeably, but I'm curious if anyone else sees these things as areas of concern.
Maybe what would help me is if there's a comp - a high drafted player who scored a lot of goals at a major NCAA hockey program and then went on to struggle in the NHL because of a lack of hockey sense. Is that a model we've seen before that should give us pause?
Yeah, I overlooked that. 2 more years after this season.Doesn’t Johnston have 3 more years left on his deal?
He adds a secondary assist off a faceoff win on the PP.Early 1+1.
Exceeded last seasons points while playing in 6 less games (18%) so far.
Also 23 goals in 26 games is decent
Not expecting more than 35 points out of him next year. Quite frankly I’d be shocked by more than 40. Happy to be shocked thoughHe’s going to be a welcomed addition to the top 6 next year