Tommigun
Registered User
- Jan 5, 2018
- 4,822
- 4,960
I feel like Duchene is going to cost an arm and a leg to get.
It’s Ottawa so they’d probably do Petan for Duchene+1st.
I feel like Duchene is going to cost an arm and a leg to get.
Yes they have able to collect wins even the game hasn't been so pretty. That's sign of good team.what would you suggest? they have had trouble scoring the past few games, but they have still been winning since the beg of Dec (3rd most wins in the NHL). I don't know if Maurice would make large changes.
I agree with the over reaction but there are things that need to be sorted out - much of which is being discussed.
I hope it's a slump but it feels like it might be more than that - Especially considering this is impacting across our top 6.
Players have off games / stretches - but all of your best at the same time?
We could so easily be 0-7 for this last stretch. It sucks, big time. Time to shake up all the F lines? Too soon? They are not skating, not playing with any enthusiasm. They need a good swift kick in the ass.
Perreault has been underutilized this season imo. I think his 5v5 prowess would help Laine on that 2nd line with Little. Has Perreault-Little-Laine been a thing?Yes they have able to collect wins even the game hasn't been so pretty. That's sign of good team.
I think Pomo is forced to make small change if Ehlers is out. So either MattyP or Roslo to 2nd line would be nice. It changes that line dynamic little bit. I don't think or dream that Chef and Wheels be separated.
I think one of the reasons that Laine works better with players like Lowry and Chef is that they are excellent at keeping posession of the puck and more seldom lose it on dump-ins, which is not a strength of Little. Laine and Little just don't fit well together. They both would probably play better away from each other. Connor - Little - Wheeler could be a real solid line, and Perreault - Chef - Laine makes a whole lotta sense skillwise too.True, but it does seem like the last stint he had in the bottom 6 with Lowry and co got his game going and he went on that run in November where he was moving his feet and using his body.
Your analogy doesn't fit at all in Maurice's case. In hockey terms Maurice is more like a 25 year senior manager who you brought in when your company was at its lowest low. He then in turn helped build up the company as you hired several young skilled employees and asked him to successfully incorporate them into the business which he did even with some risk to himself. Then after several years your company reach just short of the pinnacle of ultimate success in your business. But after that started to sag and you were unsure why? Would you see this person as a cancer? Or would you go to them for ideas for what is starting to go wrong and how could you fix it so you could make another run at the ultimate success for your business?
I think so too. I think they have been together for couple periods but nothing more. I remember watching one game (not remember witch one) and saw them together. I was happy to see something changing, but that lasted only one period.Perreault has been underutilized this season imo. I think his 5v5 prowess would help Laine on that 2nd line with Little. Has Perreault-Little-Laine been a thing?
If you have ever been stuck on a line with a player that you just don't click with, you know how it starts to affect your play. I don't think either of them are too excited about being welded to each other by Maurice for 1 1/2 season.Maybe Laine has figured out a long time ago that he has no chemistry with Little and that in his head he feels that every shift is kind of a waste anyways, so his effort is less because he feels defeated?
It would be pretty sweet if they could raise each others game.Looks like we are practicing with Laine on the LW and Rosie on the RW.
Laine - Little - Rosie
See how that one goes but it should give us a glimpse into how much chemistry Laine and Rosie could have if any.
It would be pretty sweet if they could raise each others game.
Getting to pay your players less because they are not as good as expected is not a positive. It is just a result of the negative.
Yeah and that was so last month, the Jets record means squat, team needs a new coach and a rebuild!
Your analogy doesn't fit at all in Maurice's case. In hockey terms Maurice is more like a 25 year senior manager who you brought in when your company was at its lowest low. He then in turn helped build up the company as you hired several young skilled employees and asked him to successfully incorporate them into the business which he did even with some risk to himself. Then after several years your company reach just short of the pinnacle of ultimate success in your business. But after that started to sag and you were unsure why? Would you see this person as a cancer? Or would you go to them for ideas for what is starting to go wrong and how could you fix it so you could make another run at the ultimate success for your business?
Sanitation Engineer?
I feel like Duchene is going to cost an arm and a leg to get.
Who needs to be taken out for Perreault to get a ****ing shot at top 6 minutes...
Looks like we are practicing with Laine on the LW and Rosie on the RW.
Laine - Little - Rosie
See how that one goes but it should give us a glimpse into how much chemistry Laine and Rosie could have if any.
The comments from a few Jets players were pretty telling last night. "They're a fast team, they move the puck quickly from their back end and play fast",
"They support each other really well, lots of short quick passes, they play with speed".
Isn't that how we're supposed to be playing?
Looks like we are practicing with Laine on the LW and Rosie on the RW.
Laine - Little - Rosie
See how that one goes but it should give us a glimpse into how much chemistry Laine and Rosie could have if any.