Mike Jones
Registered User
Yeah but what's the point of having an anchor tenant that demands all the money but doesn't want to pay any rent?From what I remember with Seattle's old key arena situation. The preference is generally for one big anchor tenant and the rest be concerts and events which means the arena is used nearly everyday and maximizes revenue. Two anchor tenants becomes more problematic with bookings but can still work if the owners are either the same ones or supportive of each other rather than competing against.
I think they can make smaller profits without an anchor tenant still but the aim is to try and have the arena used everyday.
I imagine the Flames could also hold the city hostage as they are the only pro sports team from a big league there. No mayor or council wants to be the ones to lose the city's pride and joy.
NHL teams are nothing more than greedy freeloaders who want everything for nothing.