Headcrush19
Registered User
- Jul 2, 2021
- 105
- 81
Didn't he indicate he didn't think he was returning in his exit meeting with Armstrong.I bet he's willing to waive with Tocchet gone.He could waive.
Didn't he indicate he didn't think he was returning in his exit meeting with Armstrong.I bet he's willing to waive with Tocchet gone.He could waive.
I was referring to Kessel being able to control where, which diminishes his trade return...He could waive.
34yo, last season, not in long term plans, no Tocchet feeding him ideal minutes, cut ties from the past and make it GMBA's team.So why are we wanting to move a top producer for peanuts?
How about Kuemper for Francouz and Graves?My apologies if this proposal is completely out to lunch, but if Garland is actually going to be moved would you guys consider the following trade:
To Col:
Kuemper (50%)
Crouse
Garland
To Az:
2021 Col first
2022 Col third
J. Barron
Kaut
Jost
Graves
Ranta
Compher
The way I see it:
Garland = 2021 first+Barron
Keumper 50%=Kaut+Ranta+Compher
Crouse=Jost+Graves+2022 third
How about Kuemper for Francouz and Graves?
I personally have no interest in moving the other two.I’d do that at 50% retained, but I would still like the Avs to acquire the other two players haha.
So why not wait until the TDL? Let the Magic new relationship maker get the most out of Phil and get a better return?34yo, last season, not in long term plans, no Tocchet feeding him ideal minutes, cut ties from the past and make it GMBA's team.
Expecting a return of a 2nd and a reclamation prospect.
So why not wait until the TDL? Let the Magic new relationship maker get the most out of Phil and get a better return?
Or the coach has to spend way too much time catering to the ego of Kessel instead of developing the young players.Becuase the flip side is Phil dogs it hoping to get traded sooner, or gets injured and we get Jack shit for him.
Or the coach has to spend way too much time catering to the ego of Kessel instead of developing the young players.
Do the numbers bear out that Kessel is a defensive liability or is this an eye test. What is his GAR? And does that take into account goals against?
+2.1 GAR 5v5 offense
-4.3 GAR 5v5 defense
-2.2 GAR overall
He's a net negative 5v5. Okay PP player. Pens dumped him after he slipped to being a wash 5v5. Has been worse in AZ.
Garland for comparison:
+5.3 offense
-0.1 defense
+7.8 GAR overall (despite playing against tougher competition)
Maybe I don't understand the numbers but it appears your numbers for Garland's overall GAR are off.
...or a deal with Seattle at the expansion draft.I don’t expect any moves to be made until after the expansion draft, but I do think we can get a pretty good piece for Kessel after the ED draft