DisgruntledHawkFan
Blackhawk Down
You can't just terminate a contract. I'm assuming they're not buying Perry out.Where did you see that it was mutual?
You can't just terminate a contract. I'm assuming they're not buying Perry out.Where did you see that it was mutual?
its a black eye on the org to go through this type of shit again and ultimate its on davidson and hockey ops/coaching staff for players they bring in, foligno clearly good, but davidson was also interested in lucic iirc so...ya know, its his deal and he reports to danny, now danny has his team dealing with brand issues once again and his new franchise player is being entangled in it...
If Perry isn't fighting this there's a reason.It's not mutual though, right? His contract is being terminated bc he breached conduct. It's a team-initiated termination, not a mutually agreed upon buyout.
You can't just terminate a contract. I'm assuming they're not buying Perry out.
Sure you can.You can't just terminate a contract. I'm assuming they're not buying Perry out.
If Perry isn't fighting this there's a reason.
Poorly worded but that's entirely my point.Yeah and the reason would be that he would have to confront whatever it is the Blackhawks found out that lead them to terminating his contract. Right now he doesn't have to divulge anything and clearly the team isn't going to.
Milan Lucic says Maple Leafs, Blackhawks expressed interest in signing him
Milan Lucic said Tuesday that the rival Toronto Maple Leafs and the rebuilding Chicago Blackhawks also expressed interest in the bruising depth winger when he hit free agency this summer. Luke Fox has more.www.sportsnet.ca
My point is that you need cause and whatever Perry did is bad enough for him not to fight it.Sure you can.
Bingo.Bud I don't get what your issue is. You can only sign players based on the information you have. You can't predict the future and you can't ensure everyone conducts themselves in the way you want/hope.
Perry was a good signing at the time. Lucic, for similar reasons, would have been a good signing. If someone steps out of line, you deal with it and move on because that's all you can do.
If you keep saying it, it might be truethey just forced two legends out the door and then turned around and said they needed vet leadership and signed a guy they had to terminate before the new year...he did something that made davidson look like he was about to cry, its not a good look for davidson no matter how you put it
They didn’t force two legends out the door, come on.they just forced two legends out the door and then turned around and said they needed vet leadership and signed a guy they had to terminate before the new year...he did something that made davidson look like he was about to cry, its not a good look for davidson no matter how you put it
no contract negotiations with two players that expected to play here forever? what exactly is that..they didn't need to go the foligno (not bad), perry and potentially lucic route (luckily didn't sign)They didn’t force two legends out the door, come on.
Yeah, unfortunately in a hyper reactionary world where people are chronically online it doesn’t look great for Davidson. That’s more an indictment on modern society rather than anything he has control over.
no contract negotiations with two players that expected to play here forever? what exactly is that..they didn't need to go the foligno (not bad), perry and potentially lucic route (luckily didn't sign)
Toews and Kane should have been allowed to retire Blackhawks if that's what they wanted. That's a very legitimate gripe fans have.One might never play again, and the other just had fairly serious hip surgery. I don't understand the issue people have with how the Hawks handled Toews/Kane.
He can fight it after it has went through, like Mike Richard's did. Doesn't have to be mutual leading up to the termination though.My point is that you need cause and whatever Perry did is bad enough for him not to fight it.
Would this team be in a better place going forward signing Toews (who probably won’t play again) and Kane for an additional 3-4 years? I am not entirely convinced.no contract negotiations with two players that expected to play here forever? what exactly is that..they didn't need to go the foligno (not bad), perry and potentially lucic route (luckily didn't sign)
Nobody is saying he isn't fighting it. It's a waiting game. That's why, according to his agent, he's taking "time away". Lawyers for Hawks have prolly gone through the case and said this is the action to take here. Now the ball is in Perry's court and it's a wait-and-see game.My point is that you need cause and whatever Perry did is bad enough for him not to fight it.