Deas
Registered User
- Feb 3, 2017
- 472
- 326
About Mario comparison: Screw adjusted stats and look at how their p/g season by season fared compared to their peers. Mario has production wise been significantly more dominant.And why not exactly?
Gretzky is out of reach I think we can all agree.
Mario
Orr
Howe
Which two can he absolutely "not touch?"
Orr: Probably the second highest peak ever but 650 games played is a HUGE indictment on a career. If Bobby's peak is a 10/10 and McDavid's is 9/10 but McDavid plays literally twice as many games, he can't be considered better? I don't get that.
Mario: Mario also severely limited by injuries and missed time. Honestly, comparing offensive peaks, Mario and Connor are like neck and neck with a slight edge to Mario. When you look at era adjusted stats ( I know, I know, they aren't perfect, ok but it's better than comparing raw totals to the 1980's) they are actually very similar. Mario has 6 scorings titles, McDavid with 5 at only 27. Safe bet he ties and likely surpasses him there. Both 3 Harts, again, McDavid only 27.
Howe: I respect an OG of the game but I rate him way less than most of HF. I have him 4th in the big 4 (soon 5th in the big 5). 6 scoring titles in 25 seasons in a purely Canadian league. Never competed against a Russian, Swede, Fin, Czech, German, Slovak, or even American (there were a handful in the league I think in the 50's but no stars. Top 50 in scoring was all Canadian). McDavid peak >> Howe
Longevity is a trait too of course and if McDavid piles up more Art Rosses albeit with less dominant margins that’s a heavy factor of course. But no, so far offensive peak is not just a slight advantage to Mario if you look at how they did vs their peers.