nowhereman
Registered User
Wow, so this is an actual opinion? I think I burnt off a few brain cells reading this post.I have Ovechkin ranked quite a bit higher than Crosby, I am not so sure Ovechkin is the greatest goalscorer of all time(he is certainly not the best) but atleast an argument could be made based on career(absolutely not for peak).
Brett Hull is underrated but doesn't really match up(although it's certainly closer than most admit), I wouldn't hesitate to say that he might have had Ovechkin beat in terms of goalscoring at his absolute best, but here the "when it's close career decides" clearly applies since it's like 10-15 years vs a handful, also Brett was a worse player than Ovi in pretty much any department except goalscoring at their bests. Crosby vs Brett Hull? Not so sure id rank Crosby above but it's really apples to oranges.
In my world a player can't "compile" above someone with clearly more dominant peak/prime but if two players are somewhat even in terms of peak longveity will decide the outcome, ideally a player have both if they wan't to be in top 10 of all time but Orr-tier excellence can't be trumped by a longer career(Bourque), Crosby lacks the peak to even begin to enter the discussion. There are like 10 Canadian centers with similiar peak, heck there are arguably 4 centers currently in the league that match Crosby for peak.
Last edited: