bucks_oil
Registered User
- Aug 25, 2005
- 8,731
- 5,117
Well, I see many of these threads for all manner of teams showing terrible missed calls missed again by the league. I dont need to have a vested interest to be puzzled by the inconsistency the league applies the rules of the game.
Yes, in this case, I am a fan of the team in question.
Are you saying, after reviewing the play, that you dont think Geekie interfered? By the rulebook,
Goaltender interference refers to any attacking player who, by means of their stick or body, interferes with or impedes the movements of the goaltender by actual physical contact. While incidental contact with the goaltender may occur, attacking players must make an effort to avoid contact in all circumstances. The onus is always on the attacking player and players who do not make an effort to avoid the goaltender must be penalized.
Goalie here.
That's 99% goalie interference.
1% "he was pushed in"
But very clearly the defenseman pushes Geekie in AFTER he's already interfered with Hellebyuck and pushed him into the net.
I don't understand the arguments for "no goalie interference". By the rulebook he clearly pushed him with his stick. It was not "incidental". He was in the crease (not that it matters if the push is obvious, but you give benefit of the doubt to the forward in terms of who's entitled to the ice when outside). And the defenseman doesn't push Geekie until after Geekie pushes Hellebyuck.
But forget all of that... break it down to first principles. We want the shooter to fairly beat the goalie and we want the goalie to fairly get a chance to stop the shot.
For all that is good and holy in this game, how can anyone say Hellebyuck had a chance to stop that puck and that Hagel simply out-competed him and beat him with a good shot? Clearly Hagel didn't earn that goal the old fashioned way. Geekie also didn't touch the puck (which Hellebyuck even admits would add a grey area), he 100% missed it... bad hand-eye coordination vs Hellebyuck getting a pad on it despite the traffic... why should Geekie be rewarded?
That's all that goalies want... a chance to make a fair play and deny a goal. That's competition. That's what sports are all about.
If my own defender bowls me over, ok, fine... great net drive opponent, you beat us this time.
If an over-exuberant attacker bowls me over or jams me across the line (that's what happened here), it's not fair play. The goalie cannot "outcompete" a push, those pads are MADE to slide without resistance.