No, but it doesn't look good.no one's afraid of +/-
You are preaching to the converted. I love the kid and he has a TON of upside.
The Blackhawks left the kid out to dry. They gave him Corey Perry to play with. Nothing else. Now, I love Corey Perry but Perry's an old SLOW players, well past his prime. What did the Blackhawks expect Bedard to do? Unless Bedard was Superman, he was not carrying this AHL team to victory.
Trade for Sid and put Bedard on his wing, then watch Bedard explode.
Why do you say that?If Bedard wants to play with Sid, he is going to have to demand a trade to the penguins
Link?Rumour has it, Bedard wants out of Chicago (already) so...
Unless they get better soon, first chance Bedard gets, he bolts.
Yikes! There has been plenty of stuff floating around...Link?
Well I mean if hockeyfeed has this it must be true lolYikes! There has been plenty of stuff floating around...
![]()
Connor Bedard’s frustration reaches new level and lands him in massive trade rumours!
Insiders had to address the chatter in Chicago before it got out of hand. Full story below:www.hockeyfeed.com
WE all see what we want to see. If you feel it is inaccurate.... cool.Well I mean if hockeyfeed has this it must be true lol
Sid doesn't want to play in Pittsburgh when there is nothing to play for.
Buddy you’re all over the place in this thread. Thinking your seeing what you want to see.WE all see what we want to see. If you feel it is inaccurate.... cool.
That's why I said we - "WE all see what we want to see".Thinking your seeing what you want to see.
Guess what, put Carlsson or Fantilli in the same position and it wouldn't be better
Why would my post make you aggressive?Thank you for that insight, Mr. Mind of Crosby.
So, he would instead demand a trade (no one's moving him without notice) to a rotten cesspool of an organization with plenty of shady history to "mentor" some busting prospect?
Right on, daddyo!
I agree. NO ONE excels on that team.Guess what, put Carlsson or Fantilli in the same position and it wouldn't be better
Good post but you are wrong about about "From his draft class. he has 64 more points (!) than the second-highest producing player drafted (Zach Benson), in about the same number of games."Far too early to assume Bedard isn't going to be a superstar. He's still a teenager.
-- He has 121 points in 145 games (68 points / 82 GP), all as a teen, while playing for the 2nd-worst club the past two seasons combined. He's producing points at the same rate that Patrick Kane did his first two seasons, and Kane was older. He's also already producing at the same rate as Nikita Kucherov in his second and third seasons, and Kucherov was two years older.
-- Despite missing games, Bedard has scored 32 more points than any other Black Hawk the past two seasons.
-- From his draft class. he has 64 more points (!) than the second-highest producing player drafted (Zach Benson), in about the same number of games.
-- The minus 84 doesn't look good (though teammates like Kurashev and Reichel are worse, per-minutes played), but who cares about plus/minus for young offensive players developing on crap teams? To wit:
> Mario Lemieux -- minus 41 first two seasons
> Joe Sakic -- minus 76 first two seasons
> Erik Karlsson -- minus 35 first two seasons
Everyone chill. After he starts shaving and has non-AHL teammates, we can start to evaluate him.
You're right of course.Good post but you are wrong about about "From his draft class. he has 64 more points (!) than the second-highest producing player drafted (Zach Benson), in about the same number of games."
Fantilli is 46 behind - as of tonight - in 20 less games. Leo Carlson too : 51 less points.
Well, he’s the only one getting Bedard minutes and Bedard treatment, he would have been scratched many times had he played under Torts regardless of the draft positionYou're right of course.
46 points is still a lot!