Omark
Tesla stock
Gongrats!! Couldn't be more happy that Bedard gets to be in a big market in a huge beautiful city. This is jackpot for the Hawks, for Bedard and for the game of hockey.
You snorted asbestos?Don't try this shit....learned the hard way, thrice....
If he falls then yes it’s a no brainerNow that the Hawks have Bedard, IF Michkov falls, do you package picks and go get him?
I think you do if he did.
You snorted asbestos?
(Takes off hat and bows)
Now that the Hawks have Bedard, IF Michkov falls, do you package picks and go get him?
I think you do if he did.
You snorted asbestos?
(Takes off hat and bows)
If he falls as low as 19, yes, it's a no-brainer. Russia issues or not.
I just posted in another thread that I had the pleasure of watching Kane in his one season in London, and Bedard, at the same age, is more dominant. In my opinion, Bedard has a higher ceiling than #88.Patty Kane is his floor.
why burn a year to just send him back, that would be idioticKD has stuck to his plan and for the most part has gone very well. my 2 cents are we draft bedard sign him and let him play 10 games to burn his first year and send him back to JR's. Just does not make sense for him to play with the Big club for 80 games with our roster. KD has said he is looking for only Short term deals and if we help with bad contracts I don't see them more then 2 years. He said its a piece to the puzzel but its just one piece. i do not see him changing. I will say after next year maybe we do a few larger contracts that are long term if the players age and curve match. I was thinking we were not going to be players in the UFA market until 25-26 but I think this could move it up a year. I still think we could move out a few rosters players and add a few bad contracts and slightly over pay on 1 years deals. IMO.
He destroyed the WHL already, nothing left to prove there.KD has stuck to his plan and for the most part has gone very well. my 2 cents are we draft bedard sign him and let him play 10 games to burn his first year and send him back to JR's. Just does not make sense for him to play with the Big club for 80 games with our roster. KD has said he is looking for only Short term deals and if we help with bad contracts I don't see them more then 2 years. He said its a piece to the puzzel but its just one piece. i do not see him changing. I will say after next year maybe we do a few larger contracts that are long term if the players age and curve match. I was thinking we were not going to be players in the UFA market until 25-26 but I think this could move it up a year. I still think we could move out a few rosters players and add a few bad contracts and slightly over pay on 1 years deals. IMO.
KD has stuck to his plan and for the most part has gone very well. my 2 cents are we draft bedard sign him and let him play 10 games to burn his first year and send him back to JR's. Just does not make sense for him to play with the Big club for 80 games with our roster. KD has said he is looking for only Short term deals and if we help with bad contracts I don't see them more then 2 years. He said its a piece to the puzzel but its just one piece. i do not see him changing. I will say after next year maybe we do a few larger contracts that are long term if the players age and curve match. I was thinking we were not going to be players in the UFA market until 25-26 but I think this could move it up a year. I still think we could move out a few rosters players and add a few bad contracts and slightly over pay on 1 years deals. IMO.
KD has stuck to his plan and for the most part has gone very well. my 2 cents are we draft bedard sign him and let him play 10 games to burn his first year and send him back to JR's. Just does not make sense for him to play with the Big club for 80 games with our roster. KD has said he is looking for only Short term deals and if we help with bad contracts I don't see them more then 2 years. He said its a piece to the puzzel but its just one piece. i do not see him changing. I will say after next year maybe we do a few larger contracts that are long term if the players age and curve match. I was thinking we were not going to be players in the UFA market until 25-26 but I think this could move it up a year. I still think we could move out a few rosters players and add a few bad contracts and slightly over pay on 1 years deals. IMO.
why burn a year to just send him back, that would be idiot
he did it with reichel. he has his reasons. gives him a chance to do a full training camp and 10 NHL games but shelters him for a roster that is the worst in the league. we are not going to have 1 top 6 player on the roster IMO. DOMI is a 3rd lines. Rechiel could be but next year probably not there yet. dickenson. johnson, boris, raddsyh? 3-4 liners. I agree he has nothing to prove but getting stronger is something he needs. he is still 17. I agree if our roster was a little deeper it would make sense. you burn the year as a show of good faith from the team to him and his manager.why burn a year to just send him back, that would be idiotic
Reichel is not Bedard.he did it with reichel. he has his reasons. gives him a chance to do a full training camp and 10 NHL games but shelters him for a roster that is the worst in the league. we are not going to have 1 top 6 player on the roster IMO. DOMI is a 3rd lines. Rechiel could be but next year probably not there yet. dickenson. johnson, boris, raddsyh? 3-4 liners. I agree he has nothing to prove but getting stronger is something he needs. he is still 17. I agree if our roster was a little deeper it would make sense. you burn the year as a show of good faith from the team to him and his manager.
edmonton had: how does any of the below reflect our roster. they were in year 3-4 of there rebuild. we are really year 1 or maybe 2 next year.I bet @kmwtrucks would say that if we were drafting McDavid too. Send his ass back to junior lol.
edmonton had: how does any of the below reflect our roster. they were in year 3-4 of there rebuild. we are really year 1 or maybe 2 next year.
Hall 24
draistal 20
eberle 25
ryan nugent hopkins 22
I agree my point was KD burnt a year for what you all thought was no reason and he had his reasons. KD thinks differently then GMS from a few years ago. we are going to be worse next year then we were this year! we lost our 2nd best D, our best bottom 6 lafferty, our best center at least the 1 st half of the year and our best wing. Putting Bedard out there with a AHL team in the NHL does not make alot of sense.Reichel is not Bedard.
What makes no sense is him playing juniors again.I agree my point was KD burnt a year for what you all thought was no reason and he had his reasons. KD thinks differently then GMS from a few years ago. we are going to be worse next year then we were this year! we lost our 2nd best D, our best bottom 6 lafferty, our best center at least the 1 st half of the year and our best wing. Putting Bedard out there with a AHL team in the NHL does not make alot of sense.
It makes a lot of sense. He is way too good for the CHL, and won't learn a damn thing there next year.I agree my point was KD burnt a year for what you all thought was no reason and he had his reasons. KD thinks differently then GMS from a few years ago. we are going to be worse next year then we were this year! we lost our 2nd best D, our best bottom 6 lafferty, our best center at least the 1 st half of the year and our best wing. Putting Bedard out there with a AHL team in the NHL does not make alot of sense.
You realize the Hawks still need to get to the cap floor, Reichel is probably up full time next season, and they can sign another top six guy on a short deal to play with him?