crowfish
Registered User
- Jun 3, 2011
- 1,064
- 1,393
Always makes zero sense to me when the losing team's player wins the playoff mvp. Each writer should just make 3 votes for each team in a game 7 situation and the winning vote getter from the winning team wins the Smythe.
What part makes no sense? It seems fairly obvious to me that it is possible to be the most valuable player and be on the losing team. There is a bias against voting for someone on the losing side, which ensures they will have to earn it (like McDavid did this year). If Barkov had 35 points or something there is no shot McDavid would have got it.