Injury Report: Community Injury Thread

vikingGoalie

Registered User
Oct 31, 2010
2,949
1,376
the baffling part with this team is that we always play better when at least one star player is injured. The tenacity, structure and just over all effort goes up a lot. We played our best hockey of last season when Crosby was out. We are doing it now with Malkin out.

I don't get it. Are players just standing around more waiting for the stars to do the work? Or are the stars refusing to play the way Sullivan is coaching when they are all present?
 

FunkySeeFunkyDo

Registered User
Aug 3, 2014
4,794
4,337
Keep Geno on LTIR until the playoffs and load up at the TDL
I don’t know—we’re going to lose one of Zucker/Blue/McCann to Seattle. If we get any good forward with term then we only get to choose to protect one out of the three above not two.
 

tom_servo

Registered User
Sep 27, 2002
17,211
6,112
Pittsburgh
the baffling part with this team is that we always play better when at least one star player is injured. The tenacity, structure and just over all effort goes up a lot. We played our best hockey of last season when Crosby was out. We are doing it now with Malkin out.

I don't get it. Are players just standing around more waiting for the stars to do the work? Or are the stars refusing to play the way Sullivan is coaching when they are all present?

Refusing to play is very strong. I would say they get a longer leash to do their thing for better or worse. The hungrier guys are more willing to follow team strategy to a T.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ugene Malkin

HandshakeLine

A real jerk thing
Nov 9, 2005
49,393
34,044
Praha, CZ
I don’t know—we’re going to lose one of Zucker/Blue/McCann to Seattle. If we get any good forward with term then we only get to choose to protect one out of the three above not two.

That's not a given, to be honest. You can't protect both Jarry and CDS, for example. In the end, we're going to lose somebody, it's best not to make moves just based on that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ncm7772

FunkySeeFunkyDo

Registered User
Aug 3, 2014
4,794
4,337
That's not a given, to be honest. You can't protect both Jarry and CDS, for example. In the end, we're going to lose somebody, it's best not to make moves just based on that.
Yeah as I think about it you and @DrDangles are right. We are going to lose someone. If we get a new good forward, we aren’t going to lose two players, so don’t let that influence your decisions.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HandshakeLine

Peat

Registered User
Jun 14, 2016
30,622
26,110
I think we can overdo the best hockey with injuries stuff sometimes. This team historically plays its best hockey in the lead up to the playoffs - that's starting now. The current injury crisis is savage but the injuries started early this season and we didn't respond then.

Last season it was glaring, but I think that was a lot to do with it being a very prolonged period of injuries to stars leading to a lot of guys playing playoff intensity for too long, and then not quite right Sid comes back and isn't quite right but everyone follows his example anyway.

I mean, there's definitely something to the idea this team is best playing with a degree of simplicity and desperation and the best spark to that is injuring an important guy... but I don't think it's the whole story.
 

bambamcam4ever

107 and counting
Feb 16, 2012
15,084
7,159
the baffling part with this team is that we always play better when at least one star player is injured. The tenacity, structure and just over all effort goes up a lot. We played our best hockey of last season when Crosby was out. We are doing it now with Malkin out.

I don't get it. Are players just standing around more waiting for the stars to do the work? Or are the stars refusing to play the way Sullivan is coaching when they are all present?
I think there is just more focus and urgency when players are out injured. They know there's less margin for error.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HandshakeLine

CrosbyMalkin

Registered User
Aug 7, 2005
6,700
1,722
I don’t know—we’re going to lose one of Zucker/Blue/McCann to Seattle. If we get any good forward with term then we only get to choose to protect one out of the three above not two.

What's the difference? You going to lose one good player anyways. So if you can't protect them all it doesn't matter if you add more forwards to the mix. So as of now you would have to leave either Blueger or McCann unprotected. If that is a hard choice then it is no big deal if you add another top 6 and have them both exposed. You still only lose one of them.

I usually hate trading for rentals but of course adding a Hall doesn't effect expansion protection. I still rather add someone good with term and expose both Blueger and McCann. If I was the GM I would do another Kapanen type trade and use Poulin and our 2nd as bait. Another top 6 makes us one of the top contenders if we aren't already.

Guentzel-Crosby-Rust
Top 6-Malkin-Kapanen
Zucker-McCann-Rodriguez
ZAR-Blueger-Tanev

That group would be as deep as any team. The Blueger line is already one of the best 3rd lines in the game and adding another strong 3rd line instead of icing Lafferty-Jankowski-Sceviour makes this team much stronger.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HandshakeLine

Sidney the Kidney

One last time
Jun 29, 2009
56,843
49,442
the baffling part with this team is that we always play better when at least one star player is injured. The tenacity, structure and just over all effort goes up a lot. We played our best hockey of last season when Crosby was out. We are doing it now with Malkin out.

I don't get it. Are players just standing around more waiting for the stars to do the work? Or are the stars refusing to play the way Sullivan is coaching when they are all present?

It's almost like there's a deferral thing going on when everyone is healthy. If Sid and Geno are both playing, both guys go 80% and assume the other guy will do some heavy lifting, and the rest of the team goes 80% because they think Sid and Geno will carry them. But when one of them is out, the other realizes he's gotta go 100% to carry the load, and the rest of the team realizes they can't just rely on two stars to carry them.
 

CrosbyMalkin

Registered User
Aug 7, 2005
6,700
1,722
It's almost like there's a deferral thing going on when everyone is healthy. If Sid and Geno are both playing, both guys go 80% and assume the other guy will do some heavy lifting, and the rest of the team goes 80% because they think Sid and Geno will carry them. But when one of them is out, the other realizes he's gotta go 100% to carry the load, and the rest of the team realizes they can't just rely on two stars to carry them.

I don't think that is the case this year. The team has been fighting a clawing all season even with Crosby and Malkin both playing. When we had 5 of our top 6 defensman out we still found ways to win and had a ton of comeback victories. This team as a ton of heart that I haven't seen since the 2016 and 2017 teams. If healthy they are going to be a very tough out. The way they play against the Islanders and Caps shows me they finally learned how to beat the system that knocked them out of the playoffs the past 3 seasons.
 

Fogel

Analytics please
May 10, 2010
1,822
344
PA
Zucker/Tanev off, Jarry on, Malkin LTIR, Blueger/Jarry full practice

PLAYERTYPE OF INJURYDURATIONSTATUSUPDATED
Mark FriedmanUBI 3/4day to daySkated optional skate 3/293/29/21
Evgeni MalkinLBI 3/16week to weekPlaced on LTIR retro 3/163/30/21
Teddy BluegerUBI 3/16day to dayFull practice 4/24/2/21
Kasperi KapanenLBI 3/24week to week"Proceeding with rehab off ice"3/29/21
Tristan JarryUBI 3/29day to dayMissed 4/1 game, practiced in full 4/2 4/2/21
[TBODY]


[/TBODY]
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ugene Malkin

wheelz87

LGP
Jun 28, 2011
9,502
3,033
Pittsburgh
Interesting— Bluegar full practice. I hope that Gaudreau isn’t just keeping his seat warm between ZAR and Turbo. Bluegar back, Jank better be the odd the man out.

It’s definitely encouraging that Gaudreau has basically been getting double the amount of ice time as Jank. I have to actually see it happen.. but I’ll be surprised if Jank is playing tomorrow assuming Blue returns. (I guess you could move somebody to wing and scratch AA/Laff.. but hopefully common sense prevails here)
 

CrosbyMalkin

Registered User
Aug 7, 2005
6,700
1,722
It’s definitely encouraging that Gaudreau has basically been getting double the amount of ice time as Jank. I have to actually see it happen.. but I’ll be surprised if Jank is playing tomorrow assuming Blue returns. (I guess you could move somebody to wing and scratch AA/Laff.. but hopefully common sense prevails here)


Does anyone know the lines at practice today? Who did Blueger practice with today for his linemates?
 

Sidney the Kidney

One last time
Jun 29, 2009
56,843
49,442
Interesting— Bluegar full practice. I hope that Gaudreau isn’t just keeping his seat warm between ZAR and Turbo. Bluegar back, Jank better be the odd the man out.

That would piss me off so much. It's pretty clear which of the two (hint: Gaudreau) has actually been playing well.
 

Tender Rip

Wears long pants
Feb 12, 2007
18,067
5,352
Shanghai, China
That would piss me off so much. It's pretty clear which of the two (hint: Gaudreau) has actually been playing well.

Sully played Gaudreau +18 and +17 minutes respectively in the last two. Can’t think it would be Gaudreau.
More worried it could be Angello if anything.

Would be real nice to see Laff Gaudreau Angello, actually.

Now there’s a sentence I never thought I’d get to write! :DD
 

Sidney the Kidney

One last time
Jun 29, 2009
56,843
49,442
Sully played Gaudreau +18 and +17 minutes respectively in the last two. Can’t think it would be Gaudreau.
More worried it could be Angello if anything.

Would be real nice to see Laff Gaudreau Angello, actually.

Now there’s a sentence I never thought I’d get to write! :DD

Yeah, Gaudreau probably stole Angello's job, not Jankowski's even though it should be the latter.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Shady Machine

Sidney the Kidney

One last time
Jun 29, 2009
56,843
49,442
I’m just hoping Sully does right on it. After all, if Janks isn’t playing C, I doubt even Sully digs the void he creates around him.

I don't even know why he's in even at center. It's not like he's even a faceoff ace that you dress to win key draws. Dude's currently at 44.7% in the dot.
 

Tender Rip

Wears long pants
Feb 12, 2007
18,067
5,352
Shanghai, China
Well, he is good positionally.
For as bland and uninspiring as he is, he has been a minus player once in his past 19 games. He has taken two penalties all season. Sure he gets outshot a ton, but it’s usually from areas that don’t hurt much.

I mean, he obviously does not win you hockey games, but all coaches have a special affinity for guys who don’t lose them for you either. He doesn’t turn over pucks in dangerous areas and he steals quite a few in the neutral zone.

I would even appreciate having Jankowski on the team as an extra if he just had a little bit of a pulse to go with his positional play. This is a 6.4, 212 pounds guy who does not score, does not hit and rarely shows any intensity. He’s very hard to like or appreciate as a fan.
 
  • Like
Reactions: EpiPen and Peat

wej20

Registered User
Aug 14, 2008
28,110
2,118
UK
Well, he is good positionally.
For as bland and uninspiring as he is, he has been a minus player once in his past 19 games. He has taken two penalties all season. Sure he gets outshot a ton, but it’s usually from areas that don’t hurt much.

I mean, he obviously does not win you hockey games, but all coaches have a special affinity for guys who don’t lose them for you either. He doesn’t turn over pucks in dangerous areas and he steals quite a few in the neutral zone.

I would even appreciate having Jankowski on the team as an extra if he just had a little bit of a pulse to go with his positional play. This is a 6.4, 212 pounds guy who does not score, does not hit and rarely shows any intensity. He’s very hard to like or appreciate as a fan.

I'm never not surprised to find out that Jankowski is 6'4 200+.
 

FunkySeeFunkyDo

Registered User
Aug 3, 2014
4,794
4,337
You thought everyone was getting healthy? Get outta here! This is the f’ing Penguins! We don’t do healthy.
 

Big Friggin Dummy

Registered User
Feb 22, 2019
26,263
25,582
Bummer about Tanev. Good news is that he won't be shy about playing exactly the same way when he gets back.
 

metalan2

Registered User
May 30, 2008
10,030
3,346
What's the difference? You going to lose one good player anyways. So if you can't protect them all it doesn't matter if you add more forwards to the mix. So as of now you would have to leave either Blueger or McCann unprotected. If that is a hard choice then it is no big deal if you add another top 6 and have them both exposed. You still only lose one of them.

I usually hate trading for rentals but of course adding a Hall doesn't effect expansion protection. I still rather add someone good with term and expose both Blueger and McCann. If I was the GM I would do another Kapanen type trade and use Poulin and our 2nd as bait. Another top 6 makes us one of the top contenders if we aren't already.

Guentzel-Crosby-Rust
Top 6-Malkin-Kapanen
Zucker-McCann-Rodriguez
ZAR-Blueger-Tanev

That group would be as deep as any team. The Blueger line is already one of the best 3rd lines in the game and adding another strong 3rd line instead of icing Lafferty-Jankowski-Sceviour makes this team much stronger.
Zucker - Blue-Mccann

Zar- Gaudreau-Tanev
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad