Combined Goalie Discussion thread

zeke

The Dube Abides
Mar 14, 2005
66,937
36,957
Let's try an analogy:

Imagine you write a review for a fancy restaurant, saying what a below average meal you had, how poorly the steak was cooked, did not meet expectations. What do you think the takeaway from someone reading that will be, will they think there's a problem with the chef or the restaurant, or attribute your negative experience to "bad luck", "cooking is voodoo"?

Well, next time someone goes to that restaurant, they'll have to wait and see if the place is any good, won't they?

Does that fancy restaurant finish top 5 in its league?
 

Dekes For Days

Registered User
Sep 24, 2018
21,324
16,013
Let's try an analogy:
Imagine you write a review for a fancy restaurant, saying what a below average meal you had, how poorly the steak was cooked, did not meet expectations. What do you think the takeaway from someone reading that will be, will they think there's a problem with the chef or the restaurant, or attribute your negative experience to "bad luck", "cooking is voodoo"? Well, next time someone goes to that restaurant, they'll have to wait and see if the place is any good, won't they?
That's a pretty horrible analogy that really doesn't work or have anything to do with anything we're talking about. But since you've deflected to this instead of addressing my post, a more accurate version of this analogy would be...

You're having dinner with a friend and he suggests a restaurant. You've been there before and it was quite good, so you go to the restaurant, but the chef is rushed and having a rough day and the experience that time ends up being a bit below average. So you go to your friend and yell at him that he's clueless about restaurants and never trust a restaurant he suggests ever again.
 

IPS

Registered User
Sep 28, 2017
16,483
27,086
Not sure what you're saying "on the contrary" to, since your random, incorrect guess about the future has nothing to do with the partial statement you quoted.
I really don't see the "framing this as a horrible disaster before we even play a game". I see reasonably healthy skepticism regarding goalies that have not had good track records as of recent.

A guess? Yes. A good one? Very much so. Everyone knows you will, you're quite predictable around these parts if you haven't noticed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ACC1224 and hotpaws

Stephen

Moderator
Feb 28, 2002
81,399
59,027
That's a pretty horrible analogy that really doesn't work or have anything to do with anything we're talking about. But since you've deflected to this instead of addressing my post, a more accurate version of this analogy would be...

You're having dinner with a friend and he suggests a restaurant. You've been there before and it was quite good, so you go to the restaurant, but the chef is rushed and having a rough day and the experience that time ends up being a bit below average. So you go to your friend and yell at him that he's clueless about restaurants and never trust a restaurant he suggests ever again.

You have to remember that I’m giving Campbell a more favorable review than you are though, and I’m stating Dubas won his bet by hitching to Campbell who at least gave us some high points and was overall average and not a problem.

Translation. “I thought the meal was fine, the chef is a little overrated but meh, let’s see next time we go to the restaurant.”
 

ToneDog

56 years and counting. #FireTheShanaClan!
Jun 11, 2017
25,529
24,859
Richmond Hill, ON
Let's try an analogy:

Imagine you write a review for a fancy restaurant, saying what a below average meal you had, how poorly the steak was cooked, did not meet expectations. What do you think the takeaway from someone reading that will be, will they think there's a problem with the chef or the restaurant, or attribute your negative experience to "bad luck", "cooking is voodoo"?

Well, next time someone goes to that restaurant, they'll have to wait and see if the place is any good, won't they?

When you are the only restaurant in town and you can sell horse meat for the same price as restaurants in other cities sell fillet mignon, you can hire the neighbourhood wino as your chef, it don't matter. Sadly most of the patrons love their rotten egg breakfasts and crow dinners.
 

Dekes For Days

Registered User
Sep 24, 2018
21,324
16,013
You have to remember that I’m giving Campbell a more favorable review than you are though, and I’m stating Dubas won his bet by hitching to Campbell who at least gave us some high points and was overall average and not a problem.
I haven't given Campbell a bad review. He was overall a good acquisition. You're just for some reason arguing against the basic fact that he was slightly below average last season.
 

Mess

Global Moderator
Feb 27, 2002
87,813
13,481
Leafs Home Board
Jack Campbell Stats 2021-2022

1662993242811.png


In Comparison to NHL league averages in Save % and GA/G

1662993632783.png

1662997177235.png

1662997287812.png

&

1662993736666.png

1662996073585.png


The Leafs team overall finished below average in SV% with .904 (22nd overall) and below average in GA/G at 3.07 (20th overall)


Jack Campbell however saved the Leafs last year because his personal stats SV% of .914 and his GA/G of 2.64 were both well above the league average, otherwise the Leafs would have been even lower still. He pulled the Leafs team stats up by his performance.

Matt Murray's Stats 2021-2022


1662997813517.png

Matt Murray's personal stats slightly below league average but very close to league average.

Ilya Samsonov's Stats 2021-2022

1662998005058.png

Ilya Samsonov personal stats also below league average in both categories.
 

Dekes For Days

Registered User
Sep 24, 2018
21,324
16,013
Jack Campbell however saved the Leafs last year because his personal stats SV% of .914 and his GA/G of 2.64 were both well above the league average
His personal stats were not "well above the league average". You're using SV% because it ignores the significant advantage that Campbell had relative to his competitors as a result of the team's high-end defensive play in front. Campbell's individual performance last season was slightly below average, as seen by his negative GSAx in the regular season and playoffs.
Matt Murray's personal stats slightly below league average but very close to league average.
This is also incorrect. Murray's individual performance last season was above average. Again, you're conveniently ignoring the impact of the horrible defensive play in front of Murray.
 

Leaf Fans

Registered User
Sep 29, 2017
21,088
9,168
Yeah, everyone knows Jack Campbell was a good goalie in Toronto. He had a couple of months when he was virtually unbeatable. He also was very poor at times especially December through February. He didn't get win a round for the Leafs and the team decided not to make a five year commitment. Now, we have gone with a different tandem with Murray, a two time champion and Samsonov a young former first round pick. No one knows if it is the answer, but instead of doing something over and expecting different results. The team decided to go this route. It is a positive development, but obviously there are no gaurentees.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tarmore

justashadowof

Registered User
Aug 15, 2020
4,025
4,230
Who will have a better year this season? Campbell as a starter in Edmonton or the best of Murray/Samsonov?
 

ToneDog

56 years and counting. #FireTheShanaClan!
Jun 11, 2017
25,529
24,859
Richmond Hill, ON
Yeah, everyone knows Jack Campbell was a good goalie in Toronto. He had a couple of months when he was virtually unbeatable. He also was very poor at times especially December through February. He didn't get win a round for the Leafs and the team decided not to make a five year commitment. Now, we have gone with a different tandem with Murray, a two time champion and Samsonov a young former first round pick. No one knows if it is the answer, but instead of doing something over and expecting different results. The team decided to go this route. It is a positive development, but obviously there are no gaurentees.

Jack played above his pay grade and made Dubas look like a genius and not the fool that signed Mrazek for 3x3.8m. The same poster who shits on him now to defend Murray/Samsonov is the same poster that laughed and would not trade Soup for Byram, Newhook and a 1st. LOL.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bomber0104

andora

Registered User
Apr 23, 2002
24,501
7,585
Victoria
Jack played above his pay grade and made Dubas look like a genius and not the fool that signed Mrazek for 3x3.8m. The same poster who shits on him now to defend Murray/Samsonov is the same poster that laughed and would not trade Soup for Byram, Newhook and a 1st. LOL.
What?
Even though the proposal is a joke surely someone wouldnt argue against it
 

Dekes For Days

Registered User
Sep 24, 2018
21,324
16,013
If Jack helps the Oil win the SC, wonder if he tells Dubas and Shanny to kiss his ass?
That would be a weird and unheard of thing for anybody to do, but especially weird for somebody like Campbell, who is not only one of the kindest people in the game, but somebody that has a lot of respect and appreciation for Dubas/Shanny.
The same poster who shits on him now to defend Murray/Samsonov is the same poster that laughed and would not trade Soup for Byram, Newhook and a 1st.
I don't see anybody dumping on Campbell. What poster are you talking about and where did this happen? Sounds made up.
 

ToneDog

56 years and counting. #FireTheShanaClan!
Jun 11, 2017
25,529
24,859
Richmond Hill, ON
That would be a weird and unheard of thing for anybody to do, but especially weird for somebody like Campbell, who is not only one of the kindest people in the game, but somebody that has a lot of respect and appreciation for Dubas/Shanny.

I don't see anybody dumping on Campbell. What poster are you talking about and where did this happen? Sounds made up.

Must be. You know like when video evidence clearly shows one thing and you say it does not. LOL
 

JT AM da real deal

Registered User
Oct 4, 2018
12,354
7,766
Nothing will be known until playoffs start .. Leafs should have enough scoring and defense to get a good lead in standings before XMAS and although I suspect things will be a lot closer this year in da fight they should get in .. then will Murray get us through a round or two???? .. I could care less if he is a 905 save % as long as he wins in playoffs when it counts .. from what I saw in Pittsburgh he was da difference maker and king maker for Pens to win da Cups .. lets hope he can be da man here too
 

Fogelhund

Registered User
Sep 15, 2007
23,320
27,469
Nothing will be known until playoffs start .. Leafs should have enough scoring and defense to get a good lead in standings before XMAS and although I suspect things will be a lot closer this year in da fight they should get in .. then will Murray get us through a round or two???? .. I could care less if he is a 905 save % as long as he wins in playoffs when it counts .. from what I saw in Pittsburgh he was da difference maker and king maker for Pens to win da Cups .. lets hope he can be da man here too

I keep tellin' ya. It's going to be Woll in the playoffs, and it's going to be good. :laugh::naughty: You are buying beers, if this off the wall prediction comes good.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tarmore

29Potvin

Registered User
Jan 27, 2012
1,022
676
London Ontario
If Jack helps the Oil win the SC, wonder if he tells Dubas and Shanny to kiss his ass?
If the Leafs win a round and the Oil miss the playoffs or lose in round one and Jack plays bad do Dubas and Shanny tell everyone to kiss theirs? Naz said what he said because multiple people within the game all said the same about winning with him on the team, and he proved everyone wrong.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Metroid

Ad

Ad

Ad