GDT: Columbus @ Nashville | 8 PM EST

GoJackets1

Someday.
Sponsor
Aug 21, 2008
7,064
3,767
Montana
Fine loss. Oh well. I am confused as to why Severson would be on the ice there instead of Provorov. When I saw he was out there I thought “that’s game”. That turned out to be correct. Haha

On the bright side, that was Fantilli’s best game of the season by far, and obviously it’s not even close. It’s nice to be reminded what he’s capable of, because he was pretty awful in a few games and it had me mildly concerned.
 

Napoli

Registered User
Oct 4, 2023
1,073
1,172
Hopefully Evason understands Severson is a trainwreck after this game. He's a giveaway and mistake prone defender and can't be trusted.
 

stevo61

Registered User
Jul 5, 2011
11,626
13,116
Canada
Fine loss. Oh well. I am confused as to why Severson would be on the ice there instead of Provorov. When I saw he was out there I thought “that’s game”. That turned out to be correct. Haha

On the bright side, that was Fantilli’s best game of the season by far, and obviously it’s not even close. It’s nice to be reminded what he’s capable of, because he was pretty awful in a few games and it had me mildly concerned.
I think its easy to forget how long it was since Fantilli was in game action and his linemates due to injuries aren't the most ideal. Hopefully when Voronkov gets back we get to see him with Fantilli and Chinakhov.
 

GoJackets1

Someday.
Sponsor
Aug 21, 2008
7,064
3,767
Montana
I think its easy to forget how long it was since Fantilli was in game action and his linemates due to injuries aren't the most ideal. Hopefully when Voronkov gets back we get to see him with Fantilli and Chinakhov.
Agreed. However, Fantilli was struggling independently as well. He’s had a very difficult time handling and carrying the puck to start the year. Weird that on a night where the puck was pretty bouncy that that issue totally disappeared for him. Hopefully it’s a sign that he’s hitting his groove.

Also, final goal notwithstanding, he is so much better defensively this season. I’m guessing that was a point of emphasis for his offseason, and I’m sure that the Evason system plays a role there as well, but it’s nice to see nonetheless.
 

Cujorulesdtown9

More Blue Pants
Sep 9, 2007
732
71
Michigan
Each time im like "Severson might be ok" he has a game like tonight, and I look at his contract and cry, just a little bit.

If not for Tarasov that game was a blowout.
There was effort, but a ton of bad decisions on the ice.
 

majormajor

Registered User
Jun 23, 2018
26,619
32,661
Hopefully Evason understands Severson is a trainwreck after this game. He's a giveaway and mistake prone defender and can't be trusted.

I think we're overreacting to a bad game by a player. He is a player who makes very visible mistakes and sometimes very costly mistakes, but if he was that bad overall you'd see it in the numbers. We'd be getting killed with him out there, and overall that's not the case. We're outscoring opponents 10-7 so far with Severson on the ice. His defensive record in his last three years in New Jersey was good. Last year in Columbus it was not, but I expect him to fit well under Evason.
 

CBJWerenski8

Rest in Peace Johnny
Jun 13, 2009
43,541
26,528
it was one bad game (from Severson). He’s been pretty good this year.

I wish Evason would have sent out Provorov after Z, Severson was fighting it all game and I’m a fan of playing the hot hand, but those 3 are the D I would play in OT so I can’t get too upset at the order.

We were also supremely out talented up front in OT. It didn’t favor us to go to OT, so be it.

Tarasov played well for the most part but there’s two goals he needs to have. Ended up being the difference. However in saying that he also had a few big time saves, so I’m not upset about it. They evened out.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Seedtype

majormajor

Registered User
Jun 23, 2018
26,619
32,661
Tarasov played well for the most part but there’s two goals he needs to have. Ended up being the difference. However in saying that he also had a few big time saves, so I’m not upset about it. They evened out.

I think his saves still outweighed those goals. This could have been 5 or 6 goal game by Nashville, scoring chance after scoring chance.
 

GoJackets1

Someday.
Sponsor
Aug 21, 2008
7,064
3,767
Montana
I think Tarasov played great. Only goal he should’ve saved was the five hole one IMO. The Carrier goal was literally one of the most perfectly placed point shots I’ve ever seen. Holy smokes.

If I were Evason, I’d wonder if Werenski and Provorov could handle half of OT each. Z is such a horse I’m sure it’d be no problem for him. That said, I can’t wait to get Mateychuk up here as I’d play him in OT in a heartbeat.
 
  • Like
Reactions: majormajor

majormajor

Registered User
Jun 23, 2018
26,619
32,661
I think Tarasov played great. Only goal he should’ve saved was the five hole one IMO. The Carrier goal was literally one of the most perfectly placed point shots I’ve ever seen. Holy smokes.

If I were Evason, I’d wonder if Werenski and Provorov could handle half of OT each. Z is such a horse I’m sure it’d be no problem for him. That said, I can’t wait to get Mateychuk up here as I’d play him in OT in a heartbeat.

I'm with you on the Mateychuk part. And of course Werenski could play every other shift.

But there's no reason to think Severson is incapable of playing 3v3. He's been on for 6 goals for and 4 against over the last 5 years at 3v3. Not bad. He got better results last year than Werenski or Provorov. You can scroll through the player stats here.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GoJackets1

GoJackets1

Someday.
Sponsor
Aug 21, 2008
7,064
3,767
Montana
I'm with you on the Mateychuk part. And of course Werenski could play every other shift.

But there's no reason to think Severson is incapable of playing 3v3. He's been on for 6 goals for and 4 against over the last 5 years at 3v3. Not bad. He got better results last year than Werenski or Provorov. You can scroll through the player stats here.
That’s interesting and somewhat surprising to know. I’m not as low on him as others around here. But he’s definitely susceptible to bad games and last night was one of them. And it was noticeable before OT. So I wish that factored into lineup decisions, but it’s the first OT of the year so I can imagine that’s just how it was set up in practice.
 

thebus88

19/20 Columbus Blue Jackets: "It Is What It Is"
Sep 27, 2017
5,207
2,828
Michigan
Depth? We have minimal depth until some guys prove something. We also need 20+ minute guys who can be out there in all situations

Provorov is playing good, primarily with Werenski, which should be noted. But, is he really a guy who should “be out there in all situations”? We’ve seen plenty of not great hockey played by Provorov with the CBJ.

And who else is covering Severson’s bum ass?

Severson is just as good of a player as Provorov and is as good or a better option on both the PP, PK, and playing top pair with Werenski.

Christiansen is growing into an impactful LD, and Provorov is literally being tasked/given the role that Mateychuk literally should have as we speak. MATEYCHUK IS BETTER THAN PROVOROV.

I don’t think a smaller playmaking middle of the lineup winger (Macceli) should really be the target, nor would I just want the team to acquire a late 1st to just draft another guy, but, a 1st rounder/2 2nd rounders could go a long way in a package to acquire a TRUE top pairing/top line forward, if people don’t have the confidence in the players we have moving forward.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad