Proposal: Colorado - Dallas

  • PLEASE check any bookmark on all devices. IF you see a link pointing to mandatory.com DELETE it Please use this URL https://forums.hfboards.com/

jonlin

Registered User
Nov 11, 2011
6,015
5,783
Colorado get:

Pavelski 50% retained UFA 2022 3,5M
Klingberg 50% retained UFA 2022 2,125M

Dallas get:

Logan O`Connor 0,75M / 1.050M UFA 2025
Tyson Jost 2M RFA 2023
Ryan Murray 2M UFA 2022
1st 2023
3rd 2022

Colorado goes all-in. Dallas wont contend this year and will need cheap contracts going forward. O`Connor and Jost will address that. Murray is in for cap-reasons as an expiring contract. Colorado doesnt have a 1st 2022, so they add the 2023 pick. I suppose Colorado wont give Newhook or Byram for rentals. Any takers?

Colorado lineup:

Landeskog - MacKinnon - Rantanen
Burakovsky - Kadri - Pavelski
Compher - Newhook - Nichuskin
Aube-Kubel - Maltsev - Sherwood

Toews - Makar
Johnson - Klingberg
Johnson - Girard
 

Mersss

Registered User
Jul 12, 2014
4,996
2,188
Pavelski is worth a 1st+
Same for Klingberg
Especially @ 50%
You're not offering 2 x 1st + in value here, Jost and O'Connor don't bring 1st rd pick value to the table.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MNRube and Johno

jonlin

Registered User
Nov 11, 2011
6,015
5,783
Pavelski is worth a 1st+
Same for Klingberg
Especially @ 50%
You're not offering 2 x 1st + in value here, Jost and O'Connor don't bring 1st rd pick value to the table.

They are cheap bottom6 players with upside. Also under control for years. I`m pretty sure O`Connor is worth a 2nd and Jost a 3rd on their own. Dallas is in need of cheap players with upside. I actually think this would benefit Dallas. I was actually gonna propose Newhook, but I doubt Colorado moves him. They will loose Kadri after this season and he is probably their next 2C. Byrams health is a concern and I doubt he is movable either.
 

jonlin

Registered User
Nov 11, 2011
6,015
5,783
The Avalanche don't need Klingberg and can't afford to let O'Connor go.

Thats why O`Connor is listed. I actually think the kid will get even better. The lineup I posted would be very good after the trade though. This is a "all-in" move and usually you have to pay something to try it.
 

Ceremony

blahem
Jun 8, 2012
113,960
16,755
Thats why O`Connor is listed. I actually think the kid will get even better. The lineup I posted would be very good after the trade though. This is a "all-in" move and usually you have to pay something to try it.
As mentioned above, we literally can't afford to let O'Connor and his contract go.

Covid-season. What if Makar and Toews go down? The last 2 seasons teams cant know what they will need in 1 week.
If Makar and Toews suffer separate misfortunes then John Klingberg isn't going to replace them.
 

jonlin

Registered User
Nov 11, 2011
6,015
5,783
As mentioned above, we literally can't afford to let O'Connor and his contract go.

Ok. I suppose O`Connor and Klingberg would be out then. Pavelski would absolutely fill a need. What about this:

Colorado get:

Pavelski 50% retained 3,5M

Dallas get:

Tyson Jost 2M RFA 2023
Murray 2M
1st 2023
 
  • Like
Reactions: AvsGuy

Johno

We deserve it
Oct 30, 2013
5,068
2,886
Late 1st, a crap shoot mid pick (basically a 4th), a cap dump, an energy player who brings nothing compared to the guys we already have in the bottom six and a mildly interesting guy playing well. Perhaps could argue that O’Connor is a late-bloomer, but he isn’t even that young anymore so yeah…

Not a package to move those two for, and definitely not to retain on them as well.
 

jonlin

Registered User
Nov 11, 2011
6,015
5,783
Perhaps could argue that O’Connor is a late-bloomer, but he isn’t even that young anymore so yea

Well yes, but the kid has showed some promise and he is extended for 1M until 2025. Thats very valuable.
 

nightonthesun

Registered User
Sep 8, 2013
1,790
2,037
New Jersey
Colorado doesn't have a good reason to pay what the cost will be for Klingberg. Might have more success lookin at a deal around Pavelski that doesn't include LOC.
 

Johno

We deserve it
Oct 30, 2013
5,068
2,886
Well yes, but the kid has showed some promise and he is extended for 1M until 2025. Thats very valuable.

His underlying numbers last year are a bit better than Gurianov’s and this year Jost’s numbers are worse than Gurianov’s. And if you now add into the mix the quality of their respective teams, Jost should be blowing Gurianov out of the water for me to even consider him having some magical upside left.
 

jonlin

Registered User
Nov 11, 2011
6,015
5,783
His underlying numbers last year are a bit better than Gurianov’s and this year Jost’s numbers are worse than Gurianov’s. And if you now add into the mix the quality of their respective teams, Jost should be blowing Gurianov out of the water for me to even consider him having some magical upside left.[/QUOTE

Theres a small difference who they play with:

NumTime%PlayersGFGA+/-SFSASF%CFCACF%
147:249.0NICOLAS AUBE-KUBEL - TYSON JOST - ALEX NEWHOOK13-2191555.9363948.0
236:096.9DARREN HELM - TYSON JOST13-2153132.6255630.9
329:025.5DARREN HELM - TYSON JOST - LOGAN O'CONNOR101161257.1231757.5
425:554.9TYSON JOST - LOGAN O'CONNOR - ALEX NEWHOOK00051623.8132633.3
525:014.8VALERI NICHUSHKIN - TYSON JOST17-662718.264811.1
624:264.6TYSON JOST - LOGAN O'CONNOR03-342414.364611.5
723:184.4DARREN HELM - JAYSON MEGNA - TYSON JOST02-252119.2133228.9
815:262.9VALERI NICHUSHKIN - TYSON JOST - ALEX NEWHOOK1014833.314960.9
915:242.9J.T. COMPHER - TYSON JOST02-241620.053213.5
1012:312.4TYSON JOST - KIEFER SHERWOOD - MIKHAIL MALTSEV0003730.081338.1
1111:462.2J.T. COMPHER - TYSON JOST - MARTIN KAUT1015362.59756.3
1211:442.2TYSON JOST - LOGAN O'CONNOR - MIKHAIL MALTSEV0001233.36554.5
1310:482.1NICOLAS AUBE-KUBEL - TYSON JOST - LOGAN O'CONNOR0005935.771433.3
149:451.9TYSON JOST - LOGAN O'CONNOR - SAMPO RANTA01-16650.07943.8
158:551.7DARREN HELM - NICOLAS AUBE-KUBEL - TYSON JOST10111284.619386.4
168:371.6NAZEM KADRI - TYSON JOST - LOGAN O'CONNOR01-17463.6101147.6
177:471.5TYSON JOST - MIKHAIL MALTSEV12-112475.014863.6
187:451.5NATHAN MACKINNON - MIKKO RANTANEN - TYSON JOST02-22625.04930.8
197:211.4TYSON JOST - SAMPO RANTA - ALEX NEWHOOK0003350.06650.0
206:491.3J.T. COMPHER - TYSON JOST - LOGAN O'CONNOR01-1060.01811.1
216:071.2NICOLAS AUBE-KUBEL - J.T. COMPHER - TYSON JOST0002433.32820.0
225:431.1DARREN HELM - TYSON JOST - MARTIN KAUT0003260.04450.0
235:311.0NAZEM KADRI - J.T. COMPHER - TYSON JOST01-1030.02528.6
245:111.0J.T. COMPHER - TYSON JOST - ALEX NEWHOOK0005362.581044.4
255:091.0JAYSON MEGNA - TYSON JOST - LOGAN O'CONNOR1014180.07463.6
264:520.9TYSON JOST - KIEFER SHERWOOD - ALEX NEWHOOK00020100.03175.0
274:500.9DARREN HELM - TYSON JOST - ALEX NEWHOOK00030100.08188.9
284:260.8DARREN HELM - ANDRE BURAKOVSKY - TYSON JOST0001233.33537.5
294:160.8JAYSON MEGNA - NICOLAS AUBE-KUBEL - TYSON JOST000020.0040.0
303:550.7TYSON JOST - MARTIN KAUT - SAMPO RANTA0001233.31614.3
[TBODY] [/TBODY]
[TBODY] [/TBODY]


NumTime%PlayersGFGA+/-SFSASF%CFCACF%
1143:0630.0JAMIE BENN - TYLER SEGUIN - DENIS GURIANOV16971156265.019910166.3
268:1814.3JAMIE BENN - MICHAEL RAFFL - DENIS GURIANOV110302851.7555649.5
327:225.7RADEK FAKSA - MICHAEL RAFFL - DENIS GURIANOV000121741.4252352.1
425:215.3ALEXANDER RADULOV - JAMIE BENN - DENIS GURIANOV101141253.8262551.0
521:154.5RADEK FAKSA - DENIS GURIANOV - JOEL KIVIRANTA0006842.9111837.9
620:574.4TYLER SEGUIN - TANNER KERO - DENIS GURIANOV01-18850.0191752.8
712:262.6LUKE GLENDENING - DENIS GURIANOV - JOEL KIVIRANTA0005838.5121544.4
810:322.2JOE PAVELSKI - DENIS GURIANOV - ROOPE HINTZ0004544.4111052.4
98:441.8DENIS GURIANOV - ROOPE HINTZ - JASON ROBERTSON1016650.0131056.5
108:191.7TYLER SEGUIN - DENIS GURIANOV - JASON ROBERTSON0004544.412666.7
117:571.7LUKE GLENDENING - TANNER KERO - DENIS GURIANOV00030100.07558.3
127:461.6JAMIE BENN - DENIS GURIANOV - JACOB PETERSON0001233.34544.4
136:531.4TYLER SEGUIN - DENIS GURIANOV - JOEL KIVIRANTA0003350.05838.5
146:051.3JAMIE BENN - TANNER KERO - DENIS GURIANOV0003350.07653.8
156:001.3TYLER SEGUIN - DENIS GURIANOV - ROOPE HINTZ0001325.04357.1
165:011.1ALEXANDER RADULOV - TYLER SEGUIN - DENIS GURIANOV0001325.02918.2
174:411.0RADEK FAKSA - DENIS GURIANOV - JACOB PETERSON000050.01712.5
184:100.9DENIS GURIANOV - ROOPE HINTZ - JACOB PETERSON0002166.75362.5
194:000.8TYLER SEGUIN - DENIS GURIANOV - JACOB PETERSON1102250.02250.0
203:550.8MICHAEL RAFFL - DENIS GURIANOV - ROOPE HINTZ0001233.35362.5
213:320.7TYLER SEGUIN - MICHAEL RAFFL - DENIS GURIANOV0002340.04450.0
223:170.7JAMIE BENN - RADEK FAKSA - DENIS GURIANOV01-11614.33730.0
233:030.6DENIS GURIANOV - JACOB PETERSON - RILEY DAMIANI0001150.04266.7
242:550.6LUKE GLENDENING - DENIS GURIANOV - JACOB PETERSON0001614.32722.2
252:540.6JAMIE BENN - DENIS GURIANOV - JASON ROBERTSON00010100.05271.4
262:490.6TYLER SEGUIN - RADEK FAKSA - DENIS GURIANOV1012250.02528.6
272:400.6JAMIE BENN - DENIS GURIANOV000030.01420.0
282:250.5MICHAEL RAFFL - LUKE GLENDENING - DENIS GURIANOV00030100.050100.0
292:230.5RADEK FAKSA - DENIS GURIANOV - RILEY TUFTE0002250.04357.1
302:190.5RADEK FAKSA - LUKE GLENDENING - DENIS GURIANOV0001150.02166.7
[TBODY] [/TBODY]
[TBODY] [/TBODY]
 

Cousin Eddie

You Serious Clark?
Nov 3, 2006
40,189
37,426
Colorado doesn’t need Klingberg.

Pavelski for Jost + 1st + some type of conditional pick
 

glenbuis

Registered User
Sep 17, 2012
4,761
896
Pavelski is worth a 1st+
Same for Klingberg
Especially @ 50%
You're not offering 2 x 1st + in value here, Jost and O'Connor don't bring 1st rd pick value to the table.
i agree 100% . colorado not giving up much at all here but getting a lot for sure . way off value wise
 

jonlin

Registered User
Nov 11, 2011
6,015
5,783
i agree 100% . colorado not giving up much at all here but getting a lot for sure . way off value wise

Are you serious? O`Connor could be a really good catch. Atleast Avs-fans dont want to part with him...
 

Mersss

Registered User
Jul 12, 2014
4,996
2,188
Are you serious? O`Connor could be a really good catch. Atleast Avs-fans dont want to part with him...
Yah cause he's a good cheap bottom 6er and they need him

But yoy're not trading top top6 pieces that wouls brinf back 1sts + for a late 1st, a botton 6er who's not that young anymore and a bust
 

jonlin

Registered User
Nov 11, 2011
6,015
5,783
Yah cause he's a good cheap bottom 6er and they need him

But yoy're not trading top top6 pieces that wouls brinf back 1sts + for a late 1st, a botton 6er who's not that young anymore and a bust

Lets agree to disagree. I believe O`Connor has Top6 potential and Jost is a serviceable bottom6 player.
 

AveryStar4Eva

Registered User
Aug 28, 2014
7,453
5,782
I think Dallas could do better splitting them up in trades. O’Connor and Jost are nice players, but I’m hoping that Dallas is inching towards a rebuild and a couple 1st round picks would be more helpful
 

AvsGuy

Hired the wrong DJ again
Sep 13, 2002
10,594
2,738
Regina, SK
I'd absolutely do Jost, Murray and a 1st for Pavelski, and I like Jost, he just badly needs a change of scenery
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad