Player Discussion: Cole Perfetti 10th OA pick

  • PLEASE check any bookmark on all devices. IF you see a link pointing to mandatory.com DELETE it Please use this URL https://forums.hfboards.com/

Weezeric

Registered User
Jan 27, 2015
4,655
6,989
Exact same career ppg and had a much worse year then Cole last year for those who penalize Cole for his year. Yes Cole will get docked some off of it for his injuries but it is a comp that will put upward pressure on the market.

Mercer’s year last year was comparable to Perfetti’s. It was also the worst year of his ELC years and Perfetti’s best. At least that’s what I’d be arguing as the Jets
 

surixon

Registered User
Jul 12, 2003
50,226
73,192
Winnipeg
Mercer’s year last year was comparable to Perfetti’s. It was also the worst year of his ELC years and Perfetti’s best. At least that’s what I’d be arguing as the Jets

They can try, but Cole can easily use that logic against the other comps like Byfield and Lundell. I was "much better then Byfield last year and was just as good this year prior to being benched". You can argue anything subjectively to make whatever point you want.

Points almost always are what is used to determine value and Cole has the same ppg as Byfield, Pinto, Mercer and Lundell with worse usage then all of them. His team has more then enough comps on his side here. The Jets have limited comps on their side here.
 

Buffdog

Registered User
Feb 13, 2019
7,460
18,106
They can try, but Cole can easily use that logic against the other comps like Byfield and Lundell. I was "much better then Byfield last year and was just as good this year prior to being benched". You can argue anything subjectively to make whatever point you want.

Points almost always are what is used to determine value and Cole has the same ppg as Byfield, Pinto, Mercer and Lundell with worse usage then all of them. His team has more then enough comps on his side here. The Jets have limited comps on their side here.
He wasn't better than anyone before being benched, which is why he was benched
 
  • Like
Reactions: RestlessYoungZero

surixon

Registered User
Jul 12, 2003
50,226
73,192
Winnipeg
He wasn't better than anyone before being benched, which is why he was benched

Thats a load of crap and you know it. He was 4th on the team in scoring when he got demoted. Are you trying to say a poor 10 game stretch negates a very strong first half and warrents a demotion? If so Mercer's 1 goal in his opening 20 games should have had him benched just like Cole. Byfields 1 goal in last 23 games should have had him riding the pine.

I'm sorry but Bones has a very different idea on handling young players and their slumps then most every other org these days. It's fine if you like the old school approach to things, but most other orgs have moved to a different tactic on this.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bigfish

Buffdog

Registered User
Feb 13, 2019
7,460
18,106
Thats a load of crap and you know it. He was 4th on the team in scoring when he got demoted. Are you trying to say a poor 10 game stretch negates a very strong first half and warrents a demotion? If so Mercer's 1 goal in his opening 20 games should have had him benched just like Cole. Byfields 1 goal in last 23 games should have had him riding the pine.

I'm sorry but Bones has a very different idea on handling young players and their slumps then most every other org these days. It's fine if you like the old school approach to things, but most other orgs have moved to a different tactic on this.
That's not true. He went a month of not producing before his icetime was cut

 

Weezeric

Registered User
Jan 27, 2015
4,655
6,989
Thats a load of crap and you know it. He was 4th on the team in scoring when he got demoted. Are you trying to say a poor 10 game stretch negates a very strong first half and warrents a demotion? If so Mercer's 1 goal in his opening 20 games should have had him benched just like Cole. Byfields 1 goal in last 23 games should have had him riding the pine.

I'm sorry but Bones has a very different idea on handling young players and their slumps then most every other org these days. It's fine if you like the old school approach to things, but most other orgs have moved to a different tactic on this.

It’s almost as if Perfetti had two seasons in a row where he got hurt and the Jets didn’t want to push him..

Byfield had 9 points over those 23 games. Perfetti went two months, 23 games with only 2 assists.
 

surixon

Registered User
Jul 12, 2003
50,226
73,192
Winnipeg
That's not true. He went a month of not producing before his icetime was cut


Did you count the games? I was one off it was 11 and not 10 games of not producing. Still my point still stands that an 11 game sample where the puck doesn't go in shouldn't be given more consideration then a 40 game sample where he scores incredibly well. You are giving far too much weight to a sample size of 1/5 the total body of work. All players have poor stretches. We've seen our Vezina caliber goalie go ice cold for stretches such as last year's playoffs. It happens to even the best. My point was not that he didn't have a cold stretch, he did, but other young players do as well such has Byfield and Mercer and their coaches handled their slumps differently.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bigfish

surixon

Registered User
Jul 12, 2003
50,226
73,192
Winnipeg
It’s almost as if Perfetti had two seasons in a row where he got hurt and the Jets didn’t want to push him..

Byfield had 9 points over those 23 games. Perfetti went two months, 23 games with only 2 assists.

Sure but Byfield was also strapped to the hip of Kopitar on the top line that entire time. Much easier to bounce assists off the ass of the teams best players with 17 or so minutes of ice time then it is to bounce assists off of fourth liners in 8 to 10 minutes of ice time.

Im sure Cole would have bounced some more assists off Scheifele and KC's ass too during his slump if they had elected to use a similar method to try to get him going.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bigfish

Buffdog

Registered User
Feb 13, 2019
7,460
18,106
Did you count the games? I was one off it was 11 and not 10 games of not producing. Still my point still stands that an 11 game sample where the puck doesn't go in shouldn't be given more consideration then a 40 game sample where he scores incredibly well. You are giving far too much weight to a sample size of 1/5 the total body of work. All players have poor stretches. We've seen our Vezina caliber goalie go ice cold for stretches such as last year's playoffs. It happens to even the best. My point was not that he didn't have a cold stretch, he did, but other young players do as well such has Byfield and Mercer and their coaches handled their slumps differently.
That's a matter of opinion. Recency bias plays a role, as does context. Cole is a young player with a history of starting strong then being injured and/or production tailing off

And his cold snap included 2 assists over 14 games before his icetime was cut... in which his GF% was 17%

In short, he deserved to be demoted. Once he was, he did nothing over the next 8 games to warrant a promotion back up the line up (one assist and GF% of 33%)

If those were Iafallo or Kupari's numbers, you wouldn't be arguing the point
 

DRW204

Registered User
Dec 26, 2010
22,854
28,083
Did you count the games? I was one off it was 11 and not 10 games of not producing. Still my point still stands that an 11 game sample where the puck doesn't go in shouldn't be given more consideration then a 40 game sample where he scores incredibly well. You are giving far too much weight to a sample size of 1/5 the total body of work. All players have poor stretches. We've seen our Vezina caliber goalie go ice cold for stretches such as last year's playoffs. It happens to even the best. My point was not that he didn't have a cold stretch, he did, but other young players do as well such has Byfield and Mercer and their coaches handled their slumps differently.
OK so using same logic, Perfetti had a V hot November and the rest of his year was pretty pedestrian, while playing a majority of it in the top 6 still

How often do you balance the weight of his hot November vs rest of year?
 

Buffdog

Registered User
Feb 13, 2019
7,460
18,106
OK so using same logic, Perfetti had a V hot November and the rest of his year was pretty pedestrian, while playing a majority of it in the top 6 still

How often do you balance the weight of his hot November vs rest of year?
Exactly. Kinda like the poster who was arguing that Schief is still a top C based on his stats from 2019

The difference is that schief's decline would be tough to reverse just based on the physiology of aging, but Cole has all the physical tools to turn a cold snap around... but, as a young player, does he have the mental tools? That's the unknown that led to Bones demoting him (IMO). There was no guarantee that Cole was going to re-find his mojo regardless of how much time was gifted to him in the top 6
 

surixon

Registered User
Jul 12, 2003
50,226
73,192
Winnipeg
That's a matter of opinion. Recency bias plays a role, as does context. Cole is a young player with a history of starting strong then being injured and/or production tailing off

And his cold snap included 2 assists over 14 games before his icetime was cut... in which his GF% was 17%

In short, he deserved to be demoted. Once he was, he did nothing over the next 8 games to warrant a promotion back up the line up (one assist and GF% of 33%)

If those were Iafallo or Kupari's numbers, you wouldn't be arguing the point

Funny you bring up Iafallo, he got a promotion to the top 6 after a stretch of games on the fourth where he produced 2 points in 20 games. By that logic Cole should have earned one with 2 points in 12.

We aren't gong to see eye to eye on this, but the notion that a skilled player can play their way up from the fourth line the way this org has run their fourth line should have been put to bed ages ago. Not one skilled player has shown well on our fourth. Not Ehlers when he was there, not KC when he was put there as a rookie and not Cole last year.

When Bones put him back in the top 6 he had 6 points in his final 5 games. Perhaps a different method would have served the player and the org better.
 

Buffdog

Registered User
Feb 13, 2019
7,460
18,106
Funny you bring up Iafallo, he got a promotion to the top 6 after a stretch of games on the fourth where he produced 2 points in 20 games. By that logic Cole should have earned one with 2 points in 12.

We aren't gong to see eye to eye on this, but the notion that a skilled player can play their way up from the fourth line the way this org has run their fourth line should have been put to bed ages ago. Not one skilled player has shown well on our fourth. Not Ehlers when he was there, not KC when he was put there as a rookie and not Cole last year.

When Bones put him back in the top 6 he had 6 points in his final 5 games. Perhaps a different method would have served the player and the org better.
So his method worked lol

In terms of Cole vs Iafallo, I understand what you're saying... but I think it's a matter of roles and expectations

When Iafallo is put in the top 6, his role is not to produce points like Cole's. He's a grinder and puck hound. If he does his job correctly, it looks different that Cole doing his

Also, with Iafallo, Bones knew exactly what he's going to get from him.. aka consistency

Now... if Iafallo stops performing HIS role consistently, he should be demoted also. But that's not based on point production, as I mentionned
 
Last edited:

surixon

Registered User
Jul 12, 2003
50,226
73,192
Winnipeg
So his method worked lol

In terms of Cole vs Iafallo, I understand what you're saying... but I think it's a matter of roles and expectations

When Iafallo is put in the top 6, his role is not to produce points like Cole's. He's a grinder and puck hound. If he does his job correctly, it looks different that Cole doing his

Also, with Iafallo, Bones knew exactly what he's gojg to get from him.. aka consistency

Now... if iafallo stops performing HIS role consistently, he should be demoted also. But that's not based on point production, as I mentionned

I personally would have sat Cole for one or two games and put him right back in the top 6 to see if a mental reset would have gotten him back on track.

Playing him in a role he's not suited for on the fourth imo prolonged the slump as he lost more confidence.

The point is could they have snapped his slump earlier and then not needed to go out and waste assets on a non factor vet in Toffoli.

Also the plan wasn't to put Cole back in the top 6. Our coach was forced into it due to a 6 game lossing streak where his trusted vets shit the bed.
 

Buffdog

Registered User
Feb 13, 2019
7,460
18,106
I personally would have sat Cole for one or two games and put him right back in the top 6 to see if a mental reset would have gotten him back on track.

Playing him in a role he's not suited for on the fourth imo prolonged the slump as he lost more confidence.

The point is could they have snapped his slump earlier and then not needed to go out and waste assets on a non factor vet in Toffoli.

Also the plan wasn't to put Cole back in the top 6. Our coach was forced into it due to a 6 game lossing streak where his trusted vets shit the bed.
Those are all reasonable viewpoints
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad