Would only add that, while they spoke positively about his production, don't think either mentioned his strong overall play. Only note it because I think it's the obvious pundit equation, young + small + playmaker = production and not much more at this point.
I think the argument is that Perfetti is in fact bringing more, and playing pretty much like a coach's dream of a young player on an increasingly strong line, and he's doing all that at 10 minutes or so per game while 55 + 81 are getting caved in with heavy minutes, despite 55's strong play.
Cole's a smart kid, and the team are winning. Plenty of time to iron things out and not default into still tha more conservative playstyle and line minutes share we've seen so often with this team when the going gets tougher.
Agreed, I'd question if they have even watched him play. Seems like they were just looking at the boxscore and game sheets when making their arguments.
I get that many young skilled players need to work on their d game before they can be trusted late in games. Especially for teams with playoff aspirations but this doesn't apply with this player. It also doesn't apply to Snerg who's getting similar treatment in terms of ice time.
I think this org just has a seniority/hierarchy issue where experience trumps actual on ice results. This has happened for years here. Saw it with JoMo and Trouba not getting pp time early in their careers. Saw it with sticking Ehlers on the 4th with Thor. Saw it with Scheifele needing Little to go down with a massive injury to get 1st line/1st unit pp time.
Seems to me the org is almost afraid to upset the veteran Apple cart by playing young players ahead based on merit.