He'll sign Jason Robertson type contract. Doubt he locks up long term like Suzuki did
He'll get way more money if he re-locks up in 4 years.Lol what. Most good young players like him who likes where they are get lock up long term.
Gorton just said yesterday he’ll be here a long time.
That dude really got paid to write like 8 paragraphs about nothing
The best deal for BOTH sides is 6 years. Habs get a guaranteed long term commitment and Caufield gets to cash in as a UFA when he's 27. So he's pretty much guaranteed 2 big contracts and Habs are guaranteed two good contracts age wiseHe'll get way more money if he re-locks up in 4 years.
The best deal for BOTH sides is 6 years. Habs get a guaranteed long term commitment and Caufield gets to cash in as a UFA when he's 27. So he's pretty much guaranteed 2 big contracts and Habs are guaranteed two good contracts age wise
He'll get way more money if he re-locks up in 4 years.
I agree that the contract you proposed would be ideal. But that's why I prefaced my comment by saying both sides. It's a total compromise contract that pays him only for his RFA years and gives the Habs long term commitment while giving Caufield another chance to cash in at a relatively young age for ufas. Also I'd prefer Habs give Caufield a 7-8 year contract at 27 rather than at 29Get him locked up for 8 years like Suzuki. He's on pace for 80 pts and 40 goals. Basically something like what Norris put up last year if you prorate his 66 games.
8 years at $8M. I think both sides would be happy with that. Hopefully Caufield and his agent don't get greedy.
hottest line of the NHL right now and you compare them to" Malkin/Sid that don't work too well" ???Cole needs the puck on his stick and Dach is taking away too much puck possession away from him.
The same reason why Malkin/Sid dont work too well together. Im unsure but has Caufield produced at a lower rate at ES ever since Dach has been moved to his line?
Cole needs the puck on his stick and Dach is taking away too much puck possession away from him.
The same reason why Malkin/Sid dont work too well together. Im unsure but has Caufield produced at a lower rate at ES ever since Dach has been moved to his line?
I agree that the contract you proposed would be ideal. But that's why I prefaced my comment by saying both sides. It's a total compromise contract that pays him only for his RFA years and gives the Habs long term commitment while giving Caufield another chance to cash in at a relatively young age for ufas. Also I'd prefer Habs give Caufield a 7-8 year contract at 27 rather than at 29
Ian Lapperière still has doubts about Caufield
I completely agree with all of your points and yet still think 6 years is a fair compromise for both sides. Whether you resign him at 27 or 29, dude is gonna want a lot. The difference might be 1-1.5 AAV which is digestible if it means 2 younger years of the player in each year of the contract. I look at it like id rather pay Caufield a lot between 22-34/35 than until 37.I want players that want to fit cap structure and the team goals. I think Caufield is one of them. There are not many teams like the Habs with MSL that would have turned around Caufield's game. He's got lots of talent and he should be paid and he will be paid. The question here is does he want $100M in his career or $150M.
I want a core locked up like the Bruins and Lightning. 4 years for Caufield is a bad idea for the team. It's good for the player but not the team IMO.
6 years? Better but they can get the 8 year term done. 8x8 is fair to both sides if it's signed today. If he scores 40 goals and 90 pts, then maybe $9M is a better number. However, agents are going to get greedy and push players for max deals with a growing cap. Back to the $100M vs $150M narrative
Hockey is a team game. This is not the NBA. If you want to win in the NHL, you need a 23 man roster and got to have cap room to have good bottom half of the line-up players as well. Or you turn into the Leafs and Oilers very quickly
2 shots in 7 games on the powerplay. I know he's focused on hard but somethings got to give somewhere. 4 in 18 for the team over this period.
Downright horrible. They basically can't score on a 4 v 4 because they take away Caufield.
2 shots in 7 games on the powerplay. I know he's focused on hard but somethings got to give somewhere. 4 in 18 for the team over this period.
Downright horrible. They basically can't score on a 4 v 4 because they take away Caufield.
Yes, and he also had a great chance the game prior, but still, my point is somethings got to give from the other 4 guys. This is pass it to Weber all over again.Did you watch the game last night?
Cole had two chances where he was given a feed for a wide open net and he missed the net both times. It should have been 2 pp goals, or at least 2 pp shots. But on the stat column, it was neither.