Absolutely! I love watching hockey, not pie charts and bar graphs.
I’m going by what I have read in the leaf board, and what a bunch of fans have told us, who took the time to come over to our board and tell us about the players we were getting.
Mostly I have suggested waiting to see how they do on our team, it’s what I’ll be doing, and I’m suggesting it as an option to others.
I know it’s a minority type of post as of yesterday and today, but that’s ok, it’s nice to have a little variety, no?
The main culprit here is 50 minutes with Ron Hainsey. Their CA/60 is 89 and their CF/60 is only 48, giving them a CF% of 35. That’s enough minutes to add up to three games together, and that’s just flat out terrible. It’s that chunk of time that moves the needle on Zaitsev and makes him look worse than his usual partner does overall.
We're still waiting to see if that Burrows trade will pan out.At what point do people get to say I told you so. 2 years? 5 years? 10 years?
We traded a 3rd rounder so they would pay the bonuses for us. Where do you think that mandate came from ?
Maybe you'll enjoy reading this Leafs fan's take on Zaitsev
Nikita Zaitsev has the worst stats of the Leafs top four
Good stuff in here:
I even argued with you about that one at the time. I was wrong and I was able to admit it, not sure why some just continue to double down with excuses after each bad move.We're still waiting to see if that Burrows trade will pan out.
Actually where did the 3rd rounder for the bonus come from?
We're still waiting to see if that Burrows trade will pan out.
There are numerous instances where PD said one thing then Euge another (stone trade, EK, “the interview”, etc). Guess which direction the team took? Was it PD making decisions or following a mandate, you tell us as the other 99% feel he was following ordersTo you?
Heatley was traded on June 30th (the day prior to his bonus being paid, not a coincidence), prior to his Bonus, but he nixed the deal. Sens tried to get rid of him before his bonus was paid, but it fell apart because he wouldn't accept it.The budget? Sure, but I doubt EM is in the room telling PD to trade pick for bonuses. PD knows what he’s allowed to spend, and he has to ice a team within those constraints.
In fairness to PD I think most teams wait until bonuses are paid before trading... we also got dinged with this with Heater way back when...
I don’t think that’s just an Ottawa thing...
That's some pretty interesting fiction you've made here. I was signing Brady's praise a lot the past year. Didn't take me long either. Would you like to tell me now how great Pierre's move to acquire Matt Duchene was?You had an extremely hard time dealing with being so far off the mark in regards to Brady,
Hey, congrats! Today is the day we're finally not paying Burrows to not play hockey!True, I guess we’re still waiting for that star prospect to make the NHL with his third team...
The budget? Sure, but I doubt EM is in the room telling PD to trade pick for bonuses. PD knows what he’s allowed to spend, and he has to ice a team within those constraints.
In fairness to PD I think most teams wait until bonuses are paid before trading... we also got dinged with this with Heater way back when...
I don’t think that’s just an Ottawa thing...
I even argued with you about that one at the time. I was wrong and I was able to admit it, not sure why some just continue to double down with excuses after each bad move.
Lol, here goes...
Burrows was good for us down the stretch and played an important role in getting us into the playoffs that year.
His two year didn’t prevent us from doing anything, and he definitely wasn’t to blame for the broken dressing room, or the sub par play by virtually the entire roster.
The prospect we traded has not shown to be an NHL player yet, and had already been traded again.
In actually retrospect, we haven’t been shown to have given up anything of substance for AB helping us make the playoffs that year. Remember, he was scoring at a 0.5ppg pace down the stretch and was first star in three games alone.
Another example of Sens mythmaking.... turns out it isn’t actually an example of a terrible trade....
Actually where did the 3rd rounder for the bonus come from?
There are numerous instances where PD said one thing then Euge another (stone trade, EK, “the interview”, etc). Guess which direction the team took? Was it PD making decisions or following a mandate, you tell us as the other 99% feel he was following orders
Lol, here goes...
Burrows was good for us down the stretch and played an important role in getting us into the playoffs that year.
His two year didn’t prevent us from doing anything, and he definitely wasn’t to blame for the broken dressing room, or the sub par play by virtually the entire roster.
The prospect we traded has not shown to be an NHL player yet, and had already been traded again.
In actually retrospect, we haven’t been shown to have given up anything of substance for AB helping us make the playoffs that year. Remember, he was scoring at a 0.5ppg pace down the stretch and was first star in three games alone.
Another example of Sens mythmaking.... turns out it isn’t actually an example of a terrible trade....
Hey, congrats! Today is the day we're finally not paying Burrows to not play hockey!
Someone told me long ago that we need to wait and see how things will pan out. Guess you disagree on that one though.
Heatley was traded on June 30th (the day prior to his bonus being paid, not a coincidence), prior to his Bonus, but he nixed the deal. Sens tried to get rid of him before his bonus was paid, but it fell apart because he wouldn't accept it.
He then got traded 2.5 months later in September, because that' s when the next deal made. Had nothing to do with bonuses. In fact, we sued Heatley for his signing bonus
The Sens have had 2 deals arranged days/weeks prior to them being announced, as they paid draft picks to have the other teams wait until they had paid their bonuses prior to the trade. This is an Ottawa thing, it doesn't happen anywhere else.
I understand why it's happening, doesn't take it any less ridiculous, but it's part of being a Melnyk owned team, but it's not something that happens in the league outside of Ottawa
What other teams have made deals in advance (2 days for Zaitsev, prior to the draft for Zibanejad) but held up in an agreement to give a draft pick in order for other teams to pay signing bonuses? None that I can think of, though I'd love to be proven wrongWhat’s Dahlen up to these days?
Of course it does.
Lol, here goes...
Burrows was good for us down the stretch and played an important role in getting us into the playoffs that year.
His two year didn’t prevent us from doing anything, and he definitely wasn’t to blame for the broken dressing room, or the sub par play by virtually the entire roster.
The prospect we traded has not shown to be an NHL player yet, and had already been traded again.
In actually retrospect, we haven’t been shown to have given up anything of substance for AB helping us make the playoffs that year. Remember, he was scoring at a 0.5ppg pace down the stretch and was first star in three games alone.
Another example of Sens mythmaking.... turns out it isn’t actually an example of a terrible trade....
Hamsters on a wheel .......Running around and around going nowhereAll I want to see is a clear trade win from Pierre Dorion when trading with the intent of improving the NHL team.
Every single trade of that nature he makes leaves you scratching your head a little, wondering how you should feel about the trade.
The reality is we'll never win deals like this while being concerned about every dollar in/out. Everytime it seems we're in a position to win a trade, we have to make the real dollars work, and we end up surrendering our leverage.
It's ****ing tiring man. We're trying to play moneyball but we have an owner and GM who dont have the first clue how to do it.