Coaching is a serious problem.

BehindTheTimes

Registered User
Jun 24, 2018
7,479
10,328
Why isn’t Newhook centering Armia and Gally? They were pretty good together last year.

The more I see from this team the more I am leaning towards MSL being completely out of his league. Get his an experienced assistant, it doesn’t need to be Julien/Therien/Vigneault. There are tons of good coaches and assistants out there. Get one for Marty.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pomee

1909

Registered User
Jul 6, 2016
21,175
11,730
Why isn’t Newhook centering Armia and Gally? They were pretty good together last year.

The more I see from this team the more I am leaning towards MSL being completely out of his league. Get his an experienced assistant, it doesn’t need to be Julien/Therien/Vigneault. There are tons of good coaches and assistants out there. Get one for Marty.
Right on.

Why do they try to re-invent the wheel every year ?
 

Skip Bayless

The Skip Bayless Show
Aug 28, 2014
21,766
25,444

wwe-triple-h.gif
 

Shred

Registered User
Nov 1, 2005
1,371
879
The real question is: are there any players who became great coaches without any coaching expeirence at lower levels....?

Jacques Lemaire maybe?
Lemaire left Montreal after a >PPG season, 23 points in 16 playoff games during the Dynasty run to become player coach in Switzerland for 2 years. Then coached 1 year in NCAA and 1 year in the Q before becoming assistant coach for the Habs. Apparently he didn’t want the head coach title but Serge Savard forced him to take it.
 

HuGort

Registered User
Jun 15, 2012
21,478
10,520
Nova Scotia
I don't think we know that answer yet because our team has too much youth. This is not all on MSL.



Think about how MSL didn't want us to trade Monahan and now think about how a player like that is missing on our roster? I do think MSL has a huge challenge on his hands but this is not all on him. This rebuilding roster looks good but it's for the future. Rebuilds are painful when you don't hit on star after star. Takes years to grow and get them in their prime. Look at how long it took the Oilers and they have two of the best players in the NHL. How many coaches did they blame along the way?
Some of this is Hughes fault. Too many young D at same time. Keep your best 3, bring in 3 vets to tudor them. Habs gain now and into future. That's old time hockey back in Pollock era. Young players learned from quality veterans. Wasn't so many of these speciality coaches. Only makes sense, three veterans more knowledge than one assistant coach.
 

Catanddogguitarrr

Registered User
Jul 3, 2016
8,251
6,286
Nowhere land
The real question is: are there any players who became great coaches without any coaching expeirence at lower levels....?

Jacques Lemaire maybe?
The fact Lemaire was a 200 feet player and had high IQ on the ice helped him a lot. It's not like he was gifted with tons of skills and relyed only on that. The other part of the job is teaching it. There is a third part of the job he hated, it was having to speak to the medias.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Paddyjack

Tyson

Registered User
Mar 1, 2007
49,526
71,761
Texas
The fact Lemaire was a 200 feet player and had high IQ on the ice helped him a lot. It's not like he was gifted with tons of skills and relyed only on that. The other part of the job is teaching it. There is a third part of the job he hated, it was having to speak to the medias.
An argument can be made that Lemaire and Toe Blake along with maybe Al Albour are the best coaches to ever come from the player ranks.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Catanddogguitarrr

Mrb1p

PRICERSTOPDAPUCK
Dec 10, 2011
91,324
58,407
Citizen of the world
Some of this is Hughes fault. Too many young D at same time. Keep your best 3, bring in 3 vets to tudor them. Habs gain now and into future. That's old time hockey back in Pollock era. Young players learned from quality veterans. Wasn't so many of these speciality coaches. Only makes sense, three veterans more knowledge than one assistant coach.
The same goes for forwards. There's vets but they're all terrible and marginal/losers. No Perry's, no winners, no Markovs, no quality.

Instead of learning from HOFers the kids are stuck learning from Gallagher, Anderson and Matheson. What a failure.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HabsAddict

HabsAddict

Registered User
Feb 27, 2002
7,716
5,758
Visit site
The same goes for forwards. There's vets but they're all terrible and marginal/losers. No Perry's, no winners, no Markovs, no quality.

Instead of learning from HOFers the kids are stuck learning from Gallagher, Anderson and Matheson. What a failure.
That is a huge difference for lower quality players.

Back in the day, Pierre Bouchard, equal to a Tinordi, who had no business being on the Habs super team. But he had (i think) Harper, Laperriere and a few other partners that helped him develop into a useful player.

Who do we have now? At least even a few years back we had Markov or Weber.

Then we have a coach who wants to teach a position he never mastered.

Why wonder why we have defensive problems when it's so OBVIOUS?
 

habbubba

Registered User
Jan 19, 2024
281
251
This team currently is simply terrible, collectively worse than the last season and that was a season when they were tanking, pitiful. Usually teams improve when they have their core players but sure doesn't look it. Is it the coaching? one way to find out is replace the coach, if they still are the same, then it is on the players. Coaches are hired to be fired and easier to get a new coach than turn over the roster.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad