I’d say Brind’Amour and St. Louis had fairly equal careers. Where Marty was twice the top offensive player in the league, Rod was twice the best defensive player in the league.NeitherTocchet nor Brindamour were superstars.
Right on.Why isn’t Newhook centering Armia and Gally? They were pretty good together last year.
The more I see from this team the more I am leaning towards MSL being completely out of his league. Get his an experienced assistant, it doesn’t need to be Julien/Therien/Vigneault. There are tons of good coaches and assistants out there. Get one for Marty.
Except our NHL team has no system or concepts haha. It’s a long season folks, lots of time for Marty to figure it out.Yes it makes sense that both teams have the same systems and concepts. It should make the transition easier.
I dunno, to show how smart they are?Right on.
Why do they try to re-invent the wheel every year ?
Agreed but they were a rare breed of former players who are somewhat successful coaches.NeitherTocchet nor Brindamour were superstars.
You think Laine will explain to MSL how to coach?I think once Laine is back things will get better.
The real question is: are there any players who became great coaches without any coaching expeirence at lower levels....?Are there any former superstar players who became great coaches?
Lemaire left Montreal after a >PPG season, 23 points in 16 playoff games during the Dynasty run to become player coach in Switzerland for 2 years. Then coached 1 year in NCAA and 1 year in the Q before becoming assistant coach for the Habs. Apparently he didn’t want the head coach title but Serge Savard forced him to take it.The real question is: are there any players who became great coaches without any coaching expeirence at lower levels....?
Jacques Lemaire maybe?
Some of this is Hughes fault. Too many young D at same time. Keep your best 3, bring in 3 vets to tudor them. Habs gain now and into future. That's old time hockey back in Pollock era. Young players learned from quality veterans. Wasn't so many of these speciality coaches. Only makes sense, three veterans more knowledge than one assistant coach.I don't think we know that answer yet because our team has too much youth. This is not all on MSL.
Think about how MSL didn't want us to trade Monahan and now think about how a player like that is missing on our roster? I do think MSL has a huge challenge on his hands but this is not all on him. This rebuilding roster looks good but it's for the future. Rebuilds are painful when you don't hit on star after star. Takes years to grow and get them in their prime. Look at how long it took the Oilers and they have two of the best players in the NHL. How many coaches did they blame along the way?
The fact Lemaire was a 200 feet player and had high IQ on the ice helped him a lot. It's not like he was gifted with tons of skills and relyed only on that. The other part of the job is teaching it. There is a third part of the job he hated, it was having to speak to the medias.The real question is: are there any players who became great coaches without any coaching expeirence at lower levels....?
Jacques Lemaire maybe?
An argument can be made that Lemaire and Toe Blake along with maybe Al Albour are the best coaches to ever come from the player ranks.The fact Lemaire was a 200 feet player and had high IQ on the ice helped him a lot. It's not like he was gifted with tons of skills and relyed only on that. The other part of the job is teaching it. There is a third part of the job he hated, it was having to speak to the medias.
The same goes for forwards. There's vets but they're all terrible and marginal/losers. No Perry's, no winners, no Markovs, no quality.Some of this is Hughes fault. Too many young D at same time. Keep your best 3, bring in 3 vets to tudor them. Habs gain now and into future. That's old time hockey back in Pollock era. Young players learned from quality veterans. Wasn't so many of these speciality coaches. Only makes sense, three veterans more knowledge than one assistant coach.