Proposal: Clarke MacArthur to Toronto

DrTucker

Registered User
Jan 29, 2015
337
4
Halifax
Don't want to give up highly reguarded prospects? Then your 1st this year, and a future second along with MacArthur for Michalek will do
 

Halla

Registered User
Jan 28, 2016
14,727
3,779
Chabot's ceiling is a top 2 d-man. He is showing signs of possibly being a #1.

If you think a prospect of Chabot's caliber would be included in a cap dump like this, you're nuts.

See Crouse, Lawson. He was the cost of moving Bollands 16.5 million remaining. MaCarthur has 18.4 remaining.

yeah you're nuts for thinking that the sens would have to give up a similar prospect for a similar cap dump SMH :shakehead
 

Nac Mac Feegle

wee & free
Jun 10, 2011
35,471
9,875
Ottawa is a budget team that needs its top prospects and kids to remain competitive. Chances are we'll just sit Mac and hope he gets better, and that one of our kids can fill that spot on the roster.
 

varano

Registered User
Jun 27, 2013
5,161
1,917
Ottawa is a budget team that needs its top prospects and kids to remain competitive. Chances are we'll just sit Mac and hope he gets better, and that one of our kids can fill that spot on the roster.
Dude he's done. Hes never going to play again. Next time he gets hit he will have mush for brains. Its not good
 

Briecheeze

Registered User
Mar 31, 2011
620
0
Toronto
To get Clarke MacArthur off your books, you will have to be sending equivalent value with him. So unless you want to get Dustin Brown for your troubles, you should be asking yourself if you think Chabot or Brown are going to put your team $20million in the black.

Of course, if the contract IS insured, then the whole issue is moot, which I think is the best case Ontario for everyone involved.

Actually, this isn't a terrible idea. If the contract isn't insured, the whole problem for the Sens is that they are paying him real money, right?

Send MacArthur to LA for Brown, assuming LA has a LTIR slot open (not sure about that). LA gets out of that contract and can put MacArthur on LTIR, Ottawa gets an actual player for their money. (Similar to Horton for Clarkson)
 

bert

Registered User
Nov 11, 2002
37,576
23,898
Visit site
No interest. Id rather Ottawa be handcuffed then deal with that contract long term

Good I can safely say that the last thing the sens will do is help out the leafs. If ottawa did have to add assets to dumping MacArthur it wouldn't be to the leafs.

It certainly won't be Chabot either.
 

sxvnert

Registered User
Nov 23, 2015
12,807
7,995
Clarke MacArthur's recent concussion appears to be career ending, Ottawa having $4,650,000 count against the internal budget will hamstring any chance they had at contention.

What would it take to convince Toronto to take on the financial burden, and help out a divisional rival?

Leafs have enough of their own burdens to worry about. Adding one with three years left is of no interest to anyone involved.
 

MacerV

Registered User
Jul 10, 2015
1,014
0
Actually, this isn't a terrible idea. If the contract isn't insured, the whole problem for the Sens is that they are paying him real money, right?

Send MacArthur to LA for Brown, assuming LA has a LTIR slot open (not sure about that). LA gets out of that contract and can put MacArthur on LTIR, Ottawa gets an actual player for their money. (Similar to Horton for Clarkson)

Clarke MacArthur 4x$4,650,000
Dustin Brown 6x$5,875,000

It isn't a crazy idea but 6 mill is a lot of money to put into a forward not getting you much. Although the real world dollars goes down starting this year. I would imagine they hope he recovers rather than trade for Brown.
 

SpezDispenser

Registered User
Aug 15, 2007
27,529
7,118
We won't be giving up Brown or Chabot lol.

Seriously though, what would it take to get Michalek back - with Toronto retaining a fair chunk of it.
 

edguy

Registered User
Feb 5, 2014
8,962
1,521
Charlottetown, PEI
Clarke MacArthur 4x$4,650,000
Dustin Brown 6x$5,875,000

It isn't a crazy idea but 6 mill is a lot of money to put into a forward not getting you much. Although the real world dollars goes down starting this year. I would imagine they hope he recovers rather than trade for Brown.

Yeah the Kings would need to retain to make Eugene do it. But even then 6 years as opposed to 4.

Would rather AMac or Matt Moulson anyday i think..
 

russ4king

Registered User
Sep 10, 2002
1,629
29
Welland
Visit site
We won't be giving up Brown or Chabot lol.

Seriously though, what would it take to get Michalek back - with Toronto retaining a fair chunk of it.

Actually I see a fit here. If Mac's contract is insured...they will want a top 6 on a short term deal. Michalek is in the last yr of his deal at 4m.

Michalek for a 3rd in 2018

No salary retention.
 

SpezDispenser

Registered User
Aug 15, 2007
27,529
7,118
Actually I see a fit here. If Mac's contract is insured...they will want a top 6 on a short term deal. Michalek is in the last yr of his deal at 4m.

Michalek for a 3rd in 2018

No salary retention.

A 3rd with no salary retention? I think Ottawa would pass.
 

Brock Radunske

안양종합운동장 빙상장
Aug 8, 2012
16,787
4,701
We won't be giving up Brown or Chabot lol.

Seriously though, what would it take to get Michalek back - with Toronto retaining a fair chunk of it.

Based on deadline prices a player like MM would bring back a 2nd if he's retained (25-50%)
Take it or leave it.
 

TheNewEra

Registered User
Jul 10, 2013
8,226
3,633
A 3rd with no salary retention? I think Ottawa would pass.

toronto gets more if they retain salary

either a 2nd for michalek+something small

or

michalek for a 3rd+something


cant expect toronto to retain salary and get a minimal return
 

Clamshells

¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Aug 11, 2009
2,494
1,317
Clarke MacArthur 4x$4,650,000
Dustin Brown 6x$5,875,000

It isn't a crazy idea but 6 mill is a lot of money to put into a forward not getting you much. Although the real world dollars goes down starting this year. I would imagine they hope he recovers rather than trade for Brown.

Dustin Brown for MacArthur actually makes a ton of sense, if LA was willing to retain the difference in money between Brown and Mac's contracts. (13.75m over 6 years = 2.29m/yr)

LA pays the same money (32.5m) but only takes the retention cap hit (Mac on LTIR)
Ottawa pays the same money (18.75m) but only a cap hit of 3.58m .(5.875 - Retention)

LA wins with the cap space. Ottawa saves money each year for the rest of Mac's contract (only paying 1.71 to Brown in the last two years), and get a player who can step on the ice.
 

TML1967

Registered User
Jul 20, 2010
2,983
625
Actually, this isn't a terrible idea. If the contract isn't insured, the whole problem for the Sens is that they are paying him real money, right?

Send MacArthur to LA for Brown, assuming LA has a LTIR slot open (not sure about that). LA gets out of that contract and can put MacArthur on LTIR, Ottawa gets an actual player for their money. (Similar to Horton for Clarkson)

This is the kind of deal I was referring to a few pages ago. If the Sens need to pay either way, might as well get someone who can play!

Having Brown play 3rd/4th line minutes saves you (cash wise) the cost of finding another 3/4th line W (2ish million?) So you save 2 million in real cash, which is big for the Sens/any hard money cap team.

Dont think its worth much more than the 1 for 1, but could see LA retaining a bit of salary. At 1.2 retained, Brown gets paid the same as Mac. Cap wise, LA still has 4.65 million to spend on a replacement 3W, who should be a decent bit better than Brown. Could be a win-win.
Clarke MacArthur 4x$4,650,000
Dustin Brown 6x$5,875,000
 

Maurice of Orange

13:21 🏒🏒
Feb 5, 2016
10,772
7,318
Leafs will start the season with 3 players on LTIR (Horton, Robidas and Lupul) why would Toronto want to add another LTIR contract to the ones they already have.
 

FreeBird

Registered User
Dec 18, 2005
7,782
190
Clarke MacArthur's recent concussion appears to be career ending, Ottawa having $4,650,000 count against the internal budget will hamstring any chance they had at contention.

What would it take to convince Toronto to take on the financial burden, and help out a divisional rival?

If MacArthur was the Sens only hope to be in contention. :help: :help: :help:
 

russ4king

Registered User
Sep 10, 2002
1,629
29
Welland
Visit site
toronto gets more if they retain salary

either a 2nd for michalek+something small

or

michalek for a 3rd+something


cant expect toronto to retain salary and get a minimal return

I thought of that originally...but Ottawa doesnt have a 2nd for the next 2 drafts.

So nothing there to sweeten the pot for retention. Also why I moved the 3rd to 2018 as well.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad