- Oct 13, 2018
- 4,368
- 5,145
Toews - Makar is the best pair in the NHL.
Cool, and? Does that disprove what I said?
Toews - Makar is the best pair in the NHL.
Yea and no. He said Tanev and Miro was the best pair in the west. You said Hughes - Hronek was better. That’s true. But that pair still isn’t better than the Avs top pair.Cool, and? Does that disprove what I said?
I think they want leadership mixed with their youth.Ottawa should be rebuilding not trading for a rental lol
Yea and no. He said Tanev and Miro was the best pair in the west. You said Hughes - Hronek was better. That’s true. But that pair still isn’t better than the Avs.
I'd be happy as a Canucks fan to trade for him as we seem to be in an unexpected sweet spot and talking a shot would be awesome.In the past 3 years since joining the Flames this is where he's ranked among all regular defensemen in the league:
#1, 2, and 3 is defensive WAR
#1, 15, and 5 in xdefensive WAR
#1, 19, and 91 in 5v5 GA/60
#3, 15, and 4 in 5v5 SA/60
#2, 27, and 5 in 5v5 FA/60
#4, 23, and 7 in 5v5 CA/60
#2, 15, and 3 in 5v5 xGA/60
Unlike a lot of the players that ranked above him too he played those minutes almost primarily against elite competition. Over the past 3 years has hands down been the best defensive defenseman in the entire league
Not this year they aren't. Quinn and Hronek are 1-2 in +- and have dominated 5on5.Toews - Makar is the best pair in the NHL.
Leafs could definitely use him but rumour has it Conroy or higher up allegedly have zero interest in trading with Brad.I'd be happy as a Canucks fan to trade for him as we seem to be in an unexpected sweet spot and talking a shot would be awesome.
That being said the Leafs should be all in on Tanev.
If Ottawa acquires tanev my head would explode for multiple reasons
I’d be ok with a 2nd and a prospect. If we retain maybe another 4th round pick as we’ll.Friedman saying Tampa, Canucks, Leafs, Jets potentially interested.
What is everyone's best offer?
A 2nd + another piece was mentioned by the insiders in the aftermath of the Lindholm trade.
I’m curious what Jets fans would think about Tanev 50% for MTL 2nd round and Lundmark?Love to get him on the Jets
I said it about Lindholm and Zadorov that if JR sets his sights on a player, his aggressiveness and the respect he has around the league 9 times out of 10 he gets his man.Friedman saying Tampa, Canucks, Leafs, Jets potentially interested.
What is everyone's best offer?
A 2nd + another piece was mentioned by the insiders in the aftermath of the Lindholm trade.
This is really good value. But Marner is kind of opposite of what we need to do. Cowan for Tanev and a 2nd.Marner for tanev + hanifin
Zadorov can play both sides and has been predominantly used on the left in Vancouver. You take Ian Cole out:I said it about Lindholm and Zadorov that if JR sets his sights on a player, his aggressiveness and the respect he has around the league 9 times out of 10 he gets his man.
It's so secret Tanev prefers Vancouver (not sure if that matters or if he has a NTC) if the ask is a 2nd and a prospect I wonder if a 2026 1st gets it done? Maybe throw in something else to get retention?
That being said who the hell loses their starting job? Zadorov, Myers?
I would feel bad especially for Myers, guy has been playing the best hockey of his career, been the whipping boy during the dark times only to lose his job through no fault of his own
Mariner ain’t coming to Calgary. We don’t really need/want him.Marner for tanev + hanifin
I’m curious what Jets fans would think about Tanev 50% for MTL 2nd round and Lundmark?
Mariner ain’t coming to Calgary. We don’t really need/want him.
Why Lundmark? Genuinely curious what you see in him. He's probably available on waivers in October after cuts. I'd be more interested in Julien or Lambert. A guy who could potentially play C in the future.I’d be ok with a 2nd and a prospect. If we retain maybe another 4th round pick as we’ll.
I’m curious what Jets fans would think about Tanev 50% for MTL 2nd round and Lundmark?
I think he’d be more of the type of prospect Wpg would be willing to part with. I don’t see them trading one of their top prospects for Tanev. I’d much prefer Lambert, Julien or Barlow. But it’s very rare to see prospects like that get traded for rentals. Lundmark was a guy I wanted the Flames to draft and I’m more familiar with him than a lot of the other prospects. He’s a 2nd rounder RH D man so he has qualities that make him valuable.Why Lundmark? Genuinely curious what you see in him. He's probably available on waivers in October after cuts. I'd be more interested in Julien or Lambert. A guy who could potentially play C in the future.